An enhanced QUALIFLEX decision-making framework incorporating power-form scoring mechanisms within a circular intuitionistic fuzzy paradigm

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ting-Yu Chen
{"title":"An enhanced QUALIFLEX decision-making framework incorporating power-form scoring mechanisms within a circular intuitionistic fuzzy paradigm","authors":"Ting-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces an enhanced QUALItative FLEXible (QUALIFLEX) decision-making framework that integrates power-form scoring mechanisms within a Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy (CIF) paradigm. A principal innovation of this study is the formulation of parameter-driven, natural exponential-based power-form CIF scoring mechanisms that extend beyond the limitations of conventional linear aggregation models. By capturing non-linearity and interdependencies among CIF parameters, this approach enhances the reliability and robustness of decision evaluations. Additionally, this study formulates a permutation-based ranking mechanism tailored to CIF properties, reinforcing theoretical consistency while improving computational efficiency. The proposed framework integrates CIF membership, non-membership, and circular radius components into the QUALIFLEX methodology, thereby facilitating a finer-grained appraisal of alternatives under conditions of uncertainty. Furthermore, this research advances QUALIFLEX by incorporating CIF principles, refining preference modeling to enable a more comprehensive assessment of alternatives. To establish a preferential ranking, concordance–discordance metrics are applied to each dyadic comparison within the predefined preorder structure, followed by an evaluation of the overall metric across all permutations. The most suitable ranking is subsequently derived by identifying the permutation that maximizes the concordance–discordance measurement, ensuring a logically sound and robust decision outcome. Additionally, this study formulates a structured algorithmic procedure for the CIF-based QUALIFLEX methodology, ensuring systematic implementation from problem definition to optimal ranking derivation. Beyond its theoretical contributions, the present investigation probes the practical utility of CIF-QUALIFLEX within evolving decision-making arenas, particularly in assessing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Clinical Decision Support System (AI-CDSS) providers. By incorporating power-form CIF scoring mechanisms into real-world scenarios, this research fosters a more resilient and adaptable QUALIFLEX-oriented decision analysis framework. Overall, this study advances CIF-based decision analytics by introducing a novel CIF-QUALIFLEX methodology that improves computational modeling, enhances ranking accuracy, and strengthens decision-making under complex uncertainty. The integration of power-form scoring mechanisms establishes a robust foundation for future developments in permutation-driven decision analysis, with significant implications for both theoretical research and practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 103815"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625007086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces an enhanced QUALItative FLEXible (QUALIFLEX) decision-making framework that integrates power-form scoring mechanisms within a Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy (CIF) paradigm. A principal innovation of this study is the formulation of parameter-driven, natural exponential-based power-form CIF scoring mechanisms that extend beyond the limitations of conventional linear aggregation models. By capturing non-linearity and interdependencies among CIF parameters, this approach enhances the reliability and robustness of decision evaluations. Additionally, this study formulates a permutation-based ranking mechanism tailored to CIF properties, reinforcing theoretical consistency while improving computational efficiency. The proposed framework integrates CIF membership, non-membership, and circular radius components into the QUALIFLEX methodology, thereby facilitating a finer-grained appraisal of alternatives under conditions of uncertainty. Furthermore, this research advances QUALIFLEX by incorporating CIF principles, refining preference modeling to enable a more comprehensive assessment of alternatives. To establish a preferential ranking, concordance–discordance metrics are applied to each dyadic comparison within the predefined preorder structure, followed by an evaluation of the overall metric across all permutations. The most suitable ranking is subsequently derived by identifying the permutation that maximizes the concordance–discordance measurement, ensuring a logically sound and robust decision outcome. Additionally, this study formulates a structured algorithmic procedure for the CIF-based QUALIFLEX methodology, ensuring systematic implementation from problem definition to optimal ranking derivation. Beyond its theoretical contributions, the present investigation probes the practical utility of CIF-QUALIFLEX within evolving decision-making arenas, particularly in assessing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Clinical Decision Support System (AI-CDSS) providers. By incorporating power-form CIF scoring mechanisms into real-world scenarios, this research fosters a more resilient and adaptable QUALIFLEX-oriented decision analysis framework. Overall, this study advances CIF-based decision analytics by introducing a novel CIF-QUALIFLEX methodology that improves computational modeling, enhances ranking accuracy, and strengthens decision-making under complex uncertainty. The integration of power-form scoring mechanisms establishes a robust foundation for future developments in permutation-driven decision analysis, with significant implications for both theoretical research and practical applications.
一个增强的QUALIFLEX决策框架,在循环直觉模糊范式中结合权力形式评分机制
本研究引入了一个增强的定性灵活(QUALIFLEX)决策框架,该框架在循环直觉模糊(CIF)范式中集成了权力形式评分机制。本研究的一个主要创新是提出了参数驱动的、基于自然指数的幂型CIF评分机制,该机制超越了传统线性聚合模型的局限性。通过捕获CIF参数之间的非线性和相互依赖性,该方法提高了决策评估的可靠性和鲁棒性。此外,本研究还针对CIF属性构建了基于排列的排序机制,在增强理论一致性的同时提高了计算效率。提议的框架将CIF成员、非成员和圆半径组件集成到QUALIFLEX方法中,从而促进了在不确定条件下对备选方案的细粒度评估。此外,本研究通过结合CIF原则推进了QUALIFLEX,改进了偏好建模,从而能够更全面地评估备选方案。为了建立优先排序,将一致性-不一致性度量应用于预定义的预购结构中的每个二元比较,然后对所有排列的总体度量进行评估。随后,通过确定最大化一致性-不一致性度量的排列,确保逻辑合理且稳健的决策结果,得出最合适的排序。此外,本研究为基于cif的QUALIFLEX方法制定了结构化算法程序,确保从问题定义到最优排名推导的系统实施。除了理论贡献之外,本研究还探讨了CIF-QUALIFLEX在不断发展的决策领域的实际用途,特别是在评估人工智能(AI)驱动的临床决策支持系统(AI- cdss)提供商方面。通过将功率形式的CIF评分机制整合到现实场景中,本研究培养了一个更具弹性和适应性的面向qualiflex的决策分析框架。总的来说,本研究通过引入一种新的CIF-QUALIFLEX方法来推进基于cif的决策分析,该方法改进了计算建模,提高了排序准确性,并加强了复杂不确定性下的决策。权力形式评分机制的集成为排列驱动决策分析的未来发展奠定了坚实的基础,对理论研究和实际应用都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信