Trends and structural decomposition of intergenerational mobility in Chinese education: Analysis based on birth cohorts

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Junyan Dong, Ying Li, Hanjie Zhang
{"title":"Trends and structural decomposition of intergenerational mobility in Chinese education: Analysis based on birth cohorts","authors":"Junyan Dong,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Hanjie Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper empirically investigates the trend and structure of intergenerational mobility in education in China using six rounds of survey data from CGSS 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2021, which are carefully analyzed by birth year clusters. The results of the study show that: (1) in terms of relative mobility, intergenerational mobility of education in China has increased as a whole, with the sub-birth year cohorts showing a continuous increase in the 1950s cohort, a decrease in the 1960s, and then a continued increase in the 1980s; (2) the influence of parents on their offspring has found that mothers' education levels are more likely to promote intergenerational mobility of education relative to their fathers'; (3) in terms of absolute mobility, The problem of \"depreciation of education\" still exists, and after the Mosteller standardization method is used to eliminate the effect of educational inflation, it is found that the rate of inertia is the highest in the 1951–1955 interval, and then the rate of inertia decreases, and the intergenerational mobility of education increases; (4) heterogeneity analyses show that changes in mobility for men and women are not significantly different and have been steadily changing in the same trend, and that both urban and rural areas, as well as the East, Center, and West, show large differences in intergenerational mobility in the 1950s, with the gaps diminishing over time. The above results show that intergenerational mobility in education in China has not tended to stagnate or regress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the trend and structure of intergenerational mobility in education in China using six rounds of survey data from CGSS 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2021, which are carefully analyzed by birth year clusters. The results of the study show that: (1) in terms of relative mobility, intergenerational mobility of education in China has increased as a whole, with the sub-birth year cohorts showing a continuous increase in the 1950s cohort, a decrease in the 1960s, and then a continued increase in the 1980s; (2) the influence of parents on their offspring has found that mothers' education levels are more likely to promote intergenerational mobility of education relative to their fathers'; (3) in terms of absolute mobility, The problem of "depreciation of education" still exists, and after the Mosteller standardization method is used to eliminate the effect of educational inflation, it is found that the rate of inertia is the highest in the 1951–1955 interval, and then the rate of inertia decreases, and the intergenerational mobility of education increases; (4) heterogeneity analyses show that changes in mobility for men and women are not significantly different and have been steadily changing in the same trend, and that both urban and rural areas, as well as the East, Center, and West, show large differences in intergenerational mobility in the 1950s, with the gaps diminishing over time. The above results show that intergenerational mobility in education in China has not tended to stagnate or regress.
中国教育代际流动趋势与结构分解:基于出生队列的分析
本文利用2012年、2013年、2015年、2017年、2018年和2021年CGSS的6轮调查数据,对中国教育代际流动的趋势和结构进行了实证研究,并对这些数据进行了出生年份集群分析。研究结果表明:(1)在相对流动性方面,中国教育代际流动性整体呈上升趋势,各次出生年份队列呈现出50年代连续上升、60年代下降、80年代持续上升的趋势;(2)父母对子女的影响发现,相对于父亲,母亲的受教育水平更有可能促进教育的代际流动;(3)在绝对流动性方面,“教育贬值”问题依然存在,采用Mosteller标准化方法消除教育通货膨胀的影响后发现,1951-1955年间惯性率最高,之后惯性率下降,教育代际流动性增大;(4)异质性分析表明,20世纪50年代,中国男女劳动力流动性变化不存在显著差异,且呈稳定变化趋势,城乡、东部、中部和西部的代际流动性差异较大,且随着时间的推移差距逐渐缩小。上述结果表明,中国教育代际流动并没有出现停滞或倒退的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信