What affects pedestrian street crossing decisions in day and night scenarios? A case study in Charlottesville, Virginia

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Afrida Raida , Arman Hosseini , Carreen de Cárdenas , Andrew Mondschein , Arsalan Heydarian , T. Donna Chen
{"title":"What affects pedestrian street crossing decisions in day and night scenarios? A case study in Charlottesville, Virginia","authors":"Afrida Raida ,&nbsp;Arman Hosseini ,&nbsp;Carreen de Cárdenas ,&nbsp;Andrew Mondschein ,&nbsp;Arsalan Heydarian ,&nbsp;T. Donna Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pedestrian crashes and fatalities are increasing, particularly in urban areas and at nighttime. Although previous studies have examined pedestrian crossing behavior, most have not considered pedestrians’ safety perceptions and behavioral variables that may affect crossing decisions at different times of the day. This paper uses a combination of perceived safety, gaze variability, and sociodemographic data to analyze how crossing decisions differ in day and night scenarios. 63 participants walked along an urban street in Charlottesville, Virginia in the United States, where they could choose to cross anywhere along a four city-block corridor. Eye-tracking glasses were worn by participants to obtain gaze data, and surveys before and after the experiment collected sociodemographic and perceived safety data. Results show pedestrians’ perceived safety and lighting conditions may influence their decisions to cross at certain intersections, as do their walking habits, preferred travel mode, and sociodemographic characteristics. Pedestrians’ gaze variability immediately prior to crossing was higher at night compared to daytime, and increased at locations where pedestrians indicated feeling unsafe or uncomfortable. Due to increased perceptions of safety risk and discomfort at night (which is often related to insufficient lighting), pedestrians’ crossing decisions are more varied, as perception of risk is influenced by individual characteristics like age and gender. This study contributes to the existing knowledge on pedestrian crossing behavior by focusing on user-centric perceived safety and gaze data. Planning agencies can use these findings to identify necessary changes in infrastructure to encourage safer and more consistent crossing behaviors from pedestrians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedestrian crashes and fatalities are increasing, particularly in urban areas and at nighttime. Although previous studies have examined pedestrian crossing behavior, most have not considered pedestrians’ safety perceptions and behavioral variables that may affect crossing decisions at different times of the day. This paper uses a combination of perceived safety, gaze variability, and sociodemographic data to analyze how crossing decisions differ in day and night scenarios. 63 participants walked along an urban street in Charlottesville, Virginia in the United States, where they could choose to cross anywhere along a four city-block corridor. Eye-tracking glasses were worn by participants to obtain gaze data, and surveys before and after the experiment collected sociodemographic and perceived safety data. Results show pedestrians’ perceived safety and lighting conditions may influence their decisions to cross at certain intersections, as do their walking habits, preferred travel mode, and sociodemographic characteristics. Pedestrians’ gaze variability immediately prior to crossing was higher at night compared to daytime, and increased at locations where pedestrians indicated feeling unsafe or uncomfortable. Due to increased perceptions of safety risk and discomfort at night (which is often related to insufficient lighting), pedestrians’ crossing decisions are more varied, as perception of risk is influenced by individual characteristics like age and gender. This study contributes to the existing knowledge on pedestrian crossing behavior by focusing on user-centric perceived safety and gaze data. Planning agencies can use these findings to identify necessary changes in infrastructure to encourage safer and more consistent crossing behaviors from pedestrians.
在白天和夜间情况下,是什么影响了行人过马路的决定?弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔的一个案例研究
行人撞车事故和死亡人数正在增加,尤其是在城市地区和夜间。虽然以前的研究已经调查了行人过马路的行为,但大多数研究都没有考虑到行人的安全感知和行为变量,这些变量可能会影响一天中不同时间的过马路决策。本文结合感知安全性、注视可变性和社会人口统计数据来分析白天和夜间交叉决策的差异。63名参与者走在美国弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔的一条城市街道上,他们可以选择穿过四个街区走廊的任何地方。参与者佩戴眼球追踪眼镜以获取注视数据,实验前后的调查收集了社会人口学和感知安全数据。结果表明,行人感知到的安全和照明条件可能会影响他们在某些十字路口的决定,他们的步行习惯、首选出行方式和社会人口特征也会影响他们的决定。与白天相比,行人在过马路前的凝视变异性在夜间更高,在行人表示不安全或不舒服的地方,这种变异性会增加。由于对夜间安全风险和不适的感知增加(通常与照明不足有关),行人的过马路决定更加多样化,因为对风险的感知受到年龄和性别等个人特征的影响。本研究通过关注以用户为中心的感知安全性和凝视数据,对现有的行人过马路行为知识做出了贡献。规划机构可以利用这些发现来确定基础设施的必要改变,以鼓励行人更安全、更一致的过马路行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信