Evaluating gendered fault lines: Nigeria’s COVID-19 stimulus through a feminist political economy and OECD-DAC lens

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Chukwuemeka Onyebuchi Onyimadu , Oluwaseun Blessing Adetutu
{"title":"Evaluating gendered fault lines: Nigeria’s COVID-19 stimulus through a feminist political economy and OECD-DAC lens","authors":"Chukwuemeka Onyebuchi Onyimadu ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Blessing Adetutu","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the gender responsiveness of Nigeria’s COVID-19 fiscal stimulus, the Economic Sustainability Plan (ESP), through a feminist political economy lens, using the UN Women–ILO gender assessment toolkit. By analyzing macroeconomic data, sector trends, and policies, it assesses whether the ESP effectively addressed the pandemic's uneven socio-economic impacts on women, particularly in the informal sector. The results show that although the ESP included interventions for vulnerable groups and women-led businesses, it lacked a comprehensive strategy for gender mainstreaming and failed to address underlying inequalities in care work, labour participation, and access to health and social services. The paper calls for policy reforms that prioritize women’s economic independence and social protection systems. Beyond its policy relevance, this study contributes to evaluation research by demonstrating how macroeconomic stimulus programs can be assessed using OECD-DAC evaluation criteria and a feminist political economy perspective. This demonstrates how gender-sensitive evaluation frameworks can yield valuable insights for national policy design and inform approach shows how gender-sensitive evaluation frameworks can produce insights for national policy design and the international evaluation community. The study adds to the discussion on gender-responsive recovery in Africa by providing evidence-based recommendations for future fiscal policy responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the gender responsiveness of Nigeria’s COVID-19 fiscal stimulus, the Economic Sustainability Plan (ESP), through a feminist political economy lens, using the UN Women–ILO gender assessment toolkit. By analyzing macroeconomic data, sector trends, and policies, it assesses whether the ESP effectively addressed the pandemic's uneven socio-economic impacts on women, particularly in the informal sector. The results show that although the ESP included interventions for vulnerable groups and women-led businesses, it lacked a comprehensive strategy for gender mainstreaming and failed to address underlying inequalities in care work, labour participation, and access to health and social services. The paper calls for policy reforms that prioritize women’s economic independence and social protection systems. Beyond its policy relevance, this study contributes to evaluation research by demonstrating how macroeconomic stimulus programs can be assessed using OECD-DAC evaluation criteria and a feminist political economy perspective. This demonstrates how gender-sensitive evaluation frameworks can yield valuable insights for national policy design and inform approach shows how gender-sensitive evaluation frameworks can produce insights for national policy design and the international evaluation community. The study adds to the discussion on gender-responsive recovery in Africa by providing evidence-based recommendations for future fiscal policy responses.
评估性别断层线:从女权主义政治经济学和经合组织-发展援助委员会的视角看尼日利亚的COVID-19刺激措施
本文利用联合国妇女署-国际劳工组织性别评估工具包,从女权主义政治经济学的角度考察了尼日利亚2019冠状病毒病财政刺激方案——经济可持续发展计划(ESP)的性别响应能力。通过分析宏观经济数据、部门趋势和政策,本报告评估特别方案是否有效地解决了这一流行病对妇女,特别是在非正规部门对妇女造成的不平衡的社会经济影响。结果表明,虽然特别服务包括针对弱势群体和妇女领导的企业的干预措施,但它缺乏将性别问题纳入主流的全面战略,未能解决护理工作、劳动参与以及获得保健和社会服务方面的根本不平等问题。该报告呼吁进行政策改革,优先考虑妇女的经济独立和社会保护制度。除了其政策相关性之外,本研究还通过展示如何使用OECD-DAC评估标准和女权主义政治经济学观点来评估宏观经济刺激计划,从而有助于评估研究。这表明对性别问题敏感的评价框架如何能够为国家政策设计提供有价值的见解,并表明对性别问题敏感的评价框架如何能够为国家政策设计和国际评价界提供见解。该研究为未来的财政政策对策提供了基于证据的建议,从而增加了关于非洲促进性别平等的复苏的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信