{"title":"Implementing statewide literacy and special education training in the U.S.: A mixed-methods evaluation","authors":"Deborah K. Reed, Anna S. Gibbs, Julie K. Owens","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address gaps in the field’s knowledge about implementing educator preparation program (EPP) reforms at scale, this mixed methods study gathered data from one U.S. state’s instructors to understand their perceptions of and experiences complying with new legislation and implementing state-provided training modules for future K-5 literacy and special education teachers and leaders. Across the state’s 40 EPPs, 188 survey responses and 24 focus group participants’ comments were gathered. Instructors generally agreed with the policy goals and appreciated the evidence base of the module content. However, they recommended improving student engagement and providing more implementation guidance and tools. Overall, the data suggested there was a lack of systematic implementation planning that potentially hampered reform efforts. Lessons learned about implementing policies at scale are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500179X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To address gaps in the field’s knowledge about implementing educator preparation program (EPP) reforms at scale, this mixed methods study gathered data from one U.S. state’s instructors to understand their perceptions of and experiences complying with new legislation and implementing state-provided training modules for future K-5 literacy and special education teachers and leaders. Across the state’s 40 EPPs, 188 survey responses and 24 focus group participants’ comments were gathered. Instructors generally agreed with the policy goals and appreciated the evidence base of the module content. However, they recommended improving student engagement and providing more implementation guidance and tools. Overall, the data suggested there was a lack of systematic implementation planning that potentially hampered reform efforts. Lessons learned about implementing policies at scale are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.