Project Safe Guard–Trauma (PSG-T): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of lethal means safety counseling to promote secure firearm storage among individuals with PTSD

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ian H. Stanley , Julia Finn , Kathleen M. Flarity , Mengli Xiao , Rachel L. Johnson , Jaclyn C. Kearns , Natalie L. Wilver , Steven J. Berkowitz , Michael D. Anestis , Marian E. Betz , Joseph A. Simonetti
{"title":"Project Safe Guard–Trauma (PSG-T): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of lethal means safety counseling to promote secure firearm storage among individuals with PTSD","authors":"Ian H. Stanley ,&nbsp;Julia Finn ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Flarity ,&nbsp;Mengli Xiao ,&nbsp;Rachel L. Johnson ,&nbsp;Jaclyn C. Kearns ,&nbsp;Natalie L. Wilver ,&nbsp;Steven J. Berkowitz ,&nbsp;Michael D. Anestis ,&nbsp;Marian E. Betz ,&nbsp;Joseph A. Simonetti","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Firearm injury is the most common suicide method. When firearms are stored in a non-secure manner (e.g., unlocked, loaded), risk for suicide may be elevated. Accordingly, clinical, public health, and firearm industry stakeholders recommend efforts to promote secure firearm storage, such as lethal means safety counseling (LMSC). One LMSC intervention, Project Safe Guard (PSG), has demonstrated efficacy in prompting use of firearm locking devices in a sample of military service members; however, subsequent analyses show that PSG has diminished efficacy for individuals with elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD, characterized in part by hypervigilance to threat, is associated with elevated suicide risk as well as a greater likelihood of storing firearms using less secure methods. In response, our group developed an adaptation of PSG, termed Project Safe Guard-Trauma (PSG-T). This paper describes the design, methodology, and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing PSG-T to PSG among adults who screen positive for PTSD related to a victimization trauma (e.g., physical assault, sexual assault, combat) and who do not currently store all their personally owned firearms in a secure manner. PSG and PSG-T will be delivered by licensed clinical psychologists. Assessments will occur at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of PSG-T in prompting greater beliefs and practices regarding secure storage of personal firearms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425001231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firearm injury is the most common suicide method. When firearms are stored in a non-secure manner (e.g., unlocked, loaded), risk for suicide may be elevated. Accordingly, clinical, public health, and firearm industry stakeholders recommend efforts to promote secure firearm storage, such as lethal means safety counseling (LMSC). One LMSC intervention, Project Safe Guard (PSG), has demonstrated efficacy in prompting use of firearm locking devices in a sample of military service members; however, subsequent analyses show that PSG has diminished efficacy for individuals with elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD, characterized in part by hypervigilance to threat, is associated with elevated suicide risk as well as a greater likelihood of storing firearms using less secure methods. In response, our group developed an adaptation of PSG, termed Project Safe Guard-Trauma (PSG-T). This paper describes the design, methodology, and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing PSG-T to PSG among adults who screen positive for PTSD related to a victimization trauma (e.g., physical assault, sexual assault, combat) and who do not currently store all their personally owned firearms in a secure manner. PSG and PSG-T will be delivered by licensed clinical psychologists. Assessments will occur at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of PSG-T in prompting greater beliefs and practices regarding secure storage of personal firearms.
项目安全保护-创伤(PSG-T):一项随机对照试验的方案,致命手段安全咨询,以促进创伤后应激障碍患者的安全枪支储存
枪械伤害是最常见的自杀方式。当枪支以不安全的方式储存时(如未上锁、未上膛),自杀的风险可能会增加。因此,临床、公共卫生和枪支行业利益相关者建议努力促进安全枪支储存,例如致命手段安全咨询(LMSC)。一项LMSC干预,项目安全保护(PSG),已经证明了在军事服务成员样本中促使使用枪支锁定装置的有效性;然而,随后的分析表明,PSG对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状升高的个体的疗效降低。创伤后应激障碍的部分特征是对威胁的高度警惕,与自杀风险增加以及使用不太安全的方法储存枪支的可能性增加有关。作为回应,我们的小组开发了PSG的改编,称为项目安全保护-创伤(PSG- t)。本文描述了一项随机对照试验的设计、方法和方案,比较PSG- t和PSG在与受害创伤(例如,身体攻击、性侵犯、战斗)相关的创伤后应激障碍筛查呈阳性的成年人中,以及目前没有以安全的方式储存所有个人拥有的枪支。PSG和PSG- t将由持牌临床心理学家提供。评估将在干预前、干预后以及1个月、3个月和6个月的随访中进行。主要目标是确定PSG-T在促进更多关于个人枪支安全储存的信念和做法方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信