Keeping the flow: A case series on snorkel/chimney stenting during transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Magnus To , Shonit Nandakumar , Timothy Davis Ho , Harjeet Singh , Waqqas Mirza , Syed Iftikhar , Javad Savoj , Nikhil Ghatnekar , Patrick Hu
{"title":"Keeping the flow: A case series on snorkel/chimney stenting during transcatheter aortic valve replacement","authors":"Magnus To ,&nbsp;Shonit Nandakumar ,&nbsp;Timothy Davis Ho ,&nbsp;Harjeet Singh ,&nbsp;Waqqas Mirza ,&nbsp;Syed Iftikhar ,&nbsp;Javad Savoj ,&nbsp;Nikhil Ghatnekar ,&nbsp;Patrick Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.crmic.2025.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary artery occlusion is a rare but potentially fatal complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly in patients with high-risk anatomical features such as low coronary takeoff or shallow sinuses of Valsalva. Snorkel/chimney stenting has emerged as a feasible bailout or planned strategy to maintain coronary perfusion in these cases.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This case series describes the procedural approach, technical challenges, and clinical outcomes of three patients who underwent snorkel stenting of the coronary arteries following TAVR as well as one patient with concerns for coronary obstruction before TAVR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four high-risk patients underwent TAVR with planned or emergent snorkel stenting to prevent or manage coronary obstruction. Outcomes were assessed based on procedural success, coronary patency, and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Snorkel stenting was technically successful in three cases, preserving immediate coronary perfusion, while a fourth case had preparations for snorkel stenting but was not needed as the TAVR bioprosthesis did not occlude the coronary artery. Three patients survived for approximately 1–2 years post-intervention before succumbing to non-cardiac or unrelated complications and expired. Challenges included optimal stent positioning to minimize leaflet interaction and the potential for thrombotic complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case series highlights both the feasibility and limitations of snorkel stenting as a coronary protection strategy post-TAVR. While short-term technical success was achieved, long-term survival remained limited in this high-risk population. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection, procedural strategies, and long-term management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100217,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Interesting Cases","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Interesting Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950275625000486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coronary artery occlusion is a rare but potentially fatal complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly in patients with high-risk anatomical features such as low coronary takeoff or shallow sinuses of Valsalva. Snorkel/chimney stenting has emerged as a feasible bailout or planned strategy to maintain coronary perfusion in these cases.

Objective

This case series describes the procedural approach, technical challenges, and clinical outcomes of three patients who underwent snorkel stenting of the coronary arteries following TAVR as well as one patient with concerns for coronary obstruction before TAVR.

Methods

Four high-risk patients underwent TAVR with planned or emergent snorkel stenting to prevent or manage coronary obstruction. Outcomes were assessed based on procedural success, coronary patency, and survival.

Results

Snorkel stenting was technically successful in three cases, preserving immediate coronary perfusion, while a fourth case had preparations for snorkel stenting but was not needed as the TAVR bioprosthesis did not occlude the coronary artery. Three patients survived for approximately 1–2 years post-intervention before succumbing to non-cardiac or unrelated complications and expired. Challenges included optimal stent positioning to minimize leaflet interaction and the potential for thrombotic complications.

Conclusion

This case series highlights both the feasibility and limitations of snorkel stenting as a coronary protection strategy post-TAVR. While short-term technical success was achieved, long-term survival remained limited in this high-risk population. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection, procedural strategies, and long-term management.
保持血流:经导管主动脉瓣置换术中通气管/烟囱支架植入的病例系列
背景冠状动脉闭塞是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后罕见但可能致命的并发症,特别是对于具有高风险解剖特征的患者,如低冠状动脉起飞或Valsalva浅窦。在这些病例中,通气管/烟囱支架置入术已成为维持冠状动脉灌注的可行救助或计划策略。目的:本病例系列描述了三例TAVR术后行冠状动脉通气管支架置入术的患者的手术方法、技术挑战和临床结果,以及一例TAVR术前担心冠状动脉阻塞的患者。方法4例高危患者行TAVR联合计划或紧急通气管支架置入术预防或处理冠状动脉阻塞。结果评估基于手术成功、冠状动脉通畅和生存。结果3例通气管支架置入术在技术上取得了成功,保留了冠状动脉的即时灌注,4例通气管支架置入术的准备工作,但由于TAVR生物假体没有阻塞冠状动脉,因此不需要通气管支架。3例患者在干预后存活了大约1-2年,然后死于非心脏或无关的并发症。挑战包括最佳支架定位,以尽量减少小叶相互作用和潜在的血栓并发症。结论本病例系列强调了通气管支架置入术作为tavr后冠状动脉保护策略的可行性和局限性。虽然在短期技术上取得了成功,但在这一高危人群中,长期生存率仍然有限。需要进一步的研究来优化患者选择、手术策略和长期管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信