Younggeun Yoo , Junghee Park , Seonghun Kang , Jong-Sub Lee
{"title":"Depth-dependent small-strain stiffness in embankment layers: Comprehensive field and laboratory studies","authors":"Younggeun Yoo , Junghee Park , Seonghun Kang , Jong-Sub Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The evaluation of embankment layers plays a critical role in geotechnical engineering, prompting efforts towards geological investigation techniques. This study evaluates the relative density using three distinct methods: field density test, dynamic cone penetration test, and shear wave velocity measurements. The embankment layers are compacted in four different relative compaction R<sub>C</sub> = 61 %, 80 %, 90 %, and 95 % while the average water content is ω = 11.2 %. The field density test and shear wave velocity are measured at every 1 m, and the dynamic cone penetration tests are conducted at a final embankment height H = 5 m. The relative density profile derived from DCPI provides a sensitive depth indicator. In addition, the earth pressure cells embedded at 2.5 m depth from the top of the 5-m embankment tracks changes in the effective stress during the embankments and facilitates the effective stress-dependent data analyses. We select the appropriate maximum and minimum void ratios to compare the relative density and relative compaction based on the laboratory test results. Laboratory oedometer tests with a movable-ring system provide model parameters for depth-dependent properties analyses. Finally, the shear wave velocity provides a method for estimating the relative density and bridging the gap between stress-based and depth-based field interpretations. These findings suggest that the shear wave velocity is a good indicator to assess the relative density evolution, plays a critical role in long-term monitoring and provides in-situ small-strain stiffness for seismic designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101713"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391225002326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The evaluation of embankment layers plays a critical role in geotechnical engineering, prompting efforts towards geological investigation techniques. This study evaluates the relative density using three distinct methods: field density test, dynamic cone penetration test, and shear wave velocity measurements. The embankment layers are compacted in four different relative compaction RC = 61 %, 80 %, 90 %, and 95 % while the average water content is ω = 11.2 %. The field density test and shear wave velocity are measured at every 1 m, and the dynamic cone penetration tests are conducted at a final embankment height H = 5 m. The relative density profile derived from DCPI provides a sensitive depth indicator. In addition, the earth pressure cells embedded at 2.5 m depth from the top of the 5-m embankment tracks changes in the effective stress during the embankments and facilitates the effective stress-dependent data analyses. We select the appropriate maximum and minimum void ratios to compare the relative density and relative compaction based on the laboratory test results. Laboratory oedometer tests with a movable-ring system provide model parameters for depth-dependent properties analyses. Finally, the shear wave velocity provides a method for estimating the relative density and bridging the gap between stress-based and depth-based field interpretations. These findings suggest that the shear wave velocity is a good indicator to assess the relative density evolution, plays a critical role in long-term monitoring and provides in-situ small-strain stiffness for seismic designs.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.