{"title":"Assessment and experimental validation of the new wall boiling heat transfer model under different boundary conditions","authors":"Xiang Zhang , Jie Wan , Nikolai Rensch , Xu Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flow boiling widely exists in industrial systems because of its high heat transfer capability. In the previous study, we proposed a new heat transfer model for wall boiling through mechanism analysis (Zhang et al., 2024). As a newly developed model, it is quite important to explore the impact of different boundary conditions on model performance to provide potential directions for further improvement. In this paper, a series of flow boiling experiments for R134a within a wide range of boundary conditions (<em>q</em><sub><em>w</em></sub> = 80–260 kW/m<sup>2</sup>, <em>G</em> = 1000–2000 kg/(m<sup>2</sup>·s), <em>P</em> = 11–17 bar, <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo></mrow></math></span> <em>T</em><sub>in,sub</sub> = 19–38 K) were carried out in a 10 mm-diameter vertical tube, providing more than 900 data points. The developed wall boiling model was validated using these experimental data for R134a boiling, as well as referenced water boiling and n-Perfluorohexane boiling experimental data in both pipes and rectangle channels. According to the results, the mean relative error of the wall superheat between our experimental data and the model predictions is ±31.5 %. In addition, an analysis was conducted to examine the influence of different boundary conditions on the accuracy of the developed model. The reasons for the discrepancy of the calculated results were analyzed and further improvements should be considered in the model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014919702500441X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flow boiling widely exists in industrial systems because of its high heat transfer capability. In the previous study, we proposed a new heat transfer model for wall boiling through mechanism analysis (Zhang et al., 2024). As a newly developed model, it is quite important to explore the impact of different boundary conditions on model performance to provide potential directions for further improvement. In this paper, a series of flow boiling experiments for R134a within a wide range of boundary conditions (qw = 80–260 kW/m2, G = 1000–2000 kg/(m2·s), P = 11–17 bar, Tin,sub = 19–38 K) were carried out in a 10 mm-diameter vertical tube, providing more than 900 data points. The developed wall boiling model was validated using these experimental data for R134a boiling, as well as referenced water boiling and n-Perfluorohexane boiling experimental data in both pipes and rectangle channels. According to the results, the mean relative error of the wall superheat between our experimental data and the model predictions is ±31.5 %. In addition, an analysis was conducted to examine the influence of different boundary conditions on the accuracy of the developed model. The reasons for the discrepancy of the calculated results were analyzed and further improvements should be considered in the model.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.