Assessment and experimental validation of the new wall boiling heat transfer model under different boundary conditions

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xiang Zhang , Jie Wan , Nikolai Rensch , Xu Cheng
{"title":"Assessment and experimental validation of the new wall boiling heat transfer model under different boundary conditions","authors":"Xiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie Wan ,&nbsp;Nikolai Rensch ,&nbsp;Xu Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flow boiling widely exists in industrial systems because of its high heat transfer capability. In the previous study, we proposed a new heat transfer model for wall boiling through mechanism analysis (Zhang et al., 2024). As a newly developed model, it is quite important to explore the impact of different boundary conditions on model performance to provide potential directions for further improvement. In this paper, a series of flow boiling experiments for R134a within a wide range of boundary conditions (<em>q</em><sub><em>w</em></sub> = 80–260 kW/m<sup>2</sup>, <em>G</em> = 1000–2000 kg/(m<sup>2</sup>·s), <em>P</em> = 11–17 bar, <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo></mrow></math></span> <em>T</em><sub>in,sub</sub> = 19–38 K) were carried out in a 10 mm-diameter vertical tube, providing more than 900 data points. The developed wall boiling model was validated using these experimental data for R134a boiling, as well as referenced water boiling and n-Perfluorohexane boiling experimental data in both pipes and rectangle channels. According to the results, the mean relative error of the wall superheat between our experimental data and the model predictions is ±31.5 %. In addition, an analysis was conducted to examine the influence of different boundary conditions on the accuracy of the developed model. The reasons for the discrepancy of the calculated results were analyzed and further improvements should be considered in the model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014919702500441X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow boiling widely exists in industrial systems because of its high heat transfer capability. In the previous study, we proposed a new heat transfer model for wall boiling through mechanism analysis (Zhang et al., 2024). As a newly developed model, it is quite important to explore the impact of different boundary conditions on model performance to provide potential directions for further improvement. In this paper, a series of flow boiling experiments for R134a within a wide range of boundary conditions (qw = 80–260 kW/m2, G = 1000–2000 kg/(m2·s), P = 11–17 bar, Δ Tin,sub = 19–38 K) were carried out in a 10 mm-diameter vertical tube, providing more than 900 data points. The developed wall boiling model was validated using these experimental data for R134a boiling, as well as referenced water boiling and n-Perfluorohexane boiling experimental data in both pipes and rectangle channels. According to the results, the mean relative error of the wall superheat between our experimental data and the model predictions is ±31.5 %. In addition, an analysis was conducted to examine the influence of different boundary conditions on the accuracy of the developed model. The reasons for the discrepancy of the calculated results were analyzed and further improvements should be considered in the model.
不同边界条件下新壁面沸腾传热模型的评价与实验验证
流动沸腾由于具有较高的传热能力,在工业系统中广泛存在。在之前的研究中,我们通过机理分析提出了一种新的壁面沸腾传热模型(Zhang et al., 2024)。作为一种新发展的模型,探索不同边界条件对模型性能的影响,为进一步改进提供可能的方向是非常重要的。本文在直径10 mm的垂直管内,对R134a进行了宽边界条件(qw = 80-260 kW/m2, G = 1000-2000 kg/(m2·s), P = 11-17 bar, Δ Tin,sub = 19-38 K)下的一系列流动沸腾实验,提供了900多个数据点。利用所建立的壁面沸腾模型进行了R134a沸腾实验数据的验证,并参考了管道和矩形通道中水沸腾和正全氟己烷沸腾实验数据。结果表明,壁面过热的实验值与模型预测值的平均相对误差为±31.5%。此外,还分析了不同边界条件对模型精度的影响。分析了计算结果不一致的原因,提出了模型需要进一步改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信