Is it time for Canada to revisit its approach to prostate cancer screening?

IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David-Dan Nguyen , Aisha Lofters , Christopher J.D. Wallis , Alexandre R. Zlotta , Neil E. Fleshner , Quoc-Dien Trinh , Antonio Finelli , Laura C. Rosella , Allan S. Detsky , Monique J. Roobol , Girish S. Kulkarni
{"title":"Is it time for Canada to revisit its approach to prostate cancer screening?","authors":"David-Dan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Aisha Lofters ,&nbsp;Christopher J.D. Wallis ,&nbsp;Alexandre R. Zlotta ,&nbsp;Neil E. Fleshner ,&nbsp;Quoc-Dien Trinh ,&nbsp;Antonio Finelli ,&nbsp;Laura C. Rosella ,&nbsp;Allan S. Detsky ,&nbsp;Monique J. Roobol ,&nbsp;Girish S. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death among Canadian men. Despite advances in the last decade mitigating overdiagnosis and overtreatment, Canadian guidelines have recommended against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening since 2014. This has resulted in opportunistic screening, marked by inequitable access, low-value testing, and missed opportunities for early detection. We review global policy developments, emerging trial data, and implementation strategies, which suggest that organised, risk-stratified screening may improve outcomes and equity. However, overdiagnosis and associated harms remain a concern within organised programs. To address this uncertainty and generate timely, policy-relevant evidence, we propose implementing population-wide, adaptive platform trials embedded in the healthcare system. This design would enable real-time integration of new technologies, standardised protocols, and equitable access—hallmarks of a learning healthcare system. Such a model could help Canada modernise prostate cancer screening while carefully weighing benefits, harms, and equity in a rapidly evolving landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101180"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25001905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death among Canadian men. Despite advances in the last decade mitigating overdiagnosis and overtreatment, Canadian guidelines have recommended against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening since 2014. This has resulted in opportunistic screening, marked by inequitable access, low-value testing, and missed opportunities for early detection. We review global policy developments, emerging trial data, and implementation strategies, which suggest that organised, risk-stratified screening may improve outcomes and equity. However, overdiagnosis and associated harms remain a concern within organised programs. To address this uncertainty and generate timely, policy-relevant evidence, we propose implementing population-wide, adaptive platform trials embedded in the healthcare system. This design would enable real-time integration of new technologies, standardised protocols, and equitable access—hallmarks of a learning healthcare system. Such a model could help Canada modernise prostate cancer screening while carefully weighing benefits, harms, and equity in a rapidly evolving landscape.
现在是加拿大重新审视前列腺癌筛查方法的时候了吗?
前列腺癌是加拿大男性癌症死亡的第三大原因。尽管过去十年在减轻过度诊断和过度治疗方面取得了进展,但自2014年以来,加拿大指南建议不要进行常规前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查。这导致了机会性筛查,其特点是获取机会不公平、检测价值低以及错失早期发现机会。我们回顾了全球政策发展、新出现的试验数据和实施策略,这些都表明有组织的、风险分层的筛查可以改善结果和公平性。然而,在有组织的项目中,过度诊断和相关危害仍然令人担忧。为了解决这种不确定性并及时产生与政策相关的证据,我们建议在医疗保健系统中实施全民适应性平台试验。这种设计将使新技术、标准化协议和公平访问的实时集成成为可能——这是学习型医疗保健系统的标志。这种模式可以帮助加拿大实现前列腺癌筛查的现代化,同时在快速发展的环境中仔细权衡利弊和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信