Meta-analysis of direct and genomic imprinting heritabilities for growth traits in small ruminants

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Small Ruminant Research Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2025.107615
Jamshid Ehsaninia
{"title":"Meta-analysis of direct and genomic imprinting heritabilities for growth traits in small ruminants","authors":"Jamshid Ehsaninia","doi":"10.1016/j.smallrumres.2025.107615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool published estimates of maternal and paternal genomic imprinting heritability (<span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>mi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> and <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>pi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>) for economically important traits in small ruminants. Ten scientific articles (2017–2024) yielded 96 estimates of maternal and paternal genomic imprinting heritability. Cochran’s Q test and the I² statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies, while Egger’s test was used to evaluate publication bias. A Baujat plot was generated to quantify each study's contribution to overall heterogeneity (OHT) and the weighted parental genomic imprinting heritability estimates (WHE) for each trait. The weighted coefficients of variation varied from 9.51 % for the Kleiber ratio (KR) to 23.57 % for the average daily gain (ADG). The weighted average <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>mi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> ranged between 0.015 for KR and 0.111 for birth weight (BWT), while the mean <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>pi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> ranged from 0.015 for ADG to 0.049 for weaning weight (WWT). Additionally, the <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>mi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> estimates for BWT and six-month weight (SMWT) as well as the <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>pi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> estimates for BWT and KR displayed significant heterogeneity (P &lt; 0.05). The incorporation of genomic imprinting effects into genetic models increased the direct heritability (h<sup>2</sup>) of BWT by 4.72 %. However, the h<sup>2</sup> values for the other traits decreased significantly, with a reduction of 33 % for SMWT and up to 93 % for yearling weight (YWT). The I² index revealed high heterogeneity for the <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>mi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> estimate of BWT (86.30 %), but moderate heterogeneity for KR (41.5 %) and SMWT (58.10 %). For <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>pi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>, significant heterogeneity was found in BWT (70.90 %) and KR (61.32 %), whereas SMWT showed moderate heterogeneity (36.47 %). The Baujat plot revealed that the estimate of 0.120 ± 0.023 (Ghafouri-Kesbi et al., 2022b_Data set1) significantly contributed to the OHT of weighted <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>mi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> for BWT, WWT, YWT, and ADG, while it had a significant effect on both WHE and OHT concerning the mean value of <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>pi</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span> for SMWT. These findings support the integration of genomic imprinting effects in selection models to improve breeding outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21758,"journal":{"name":"Small Ruminant Research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 107615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Ruminant Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448825001889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool published estimates of maternal and paternal genomic imprinting heritability (hmi2 and hpi2) for economically important traits in small ruminants. Ten scientific articles (2017–2024) yielded 96 estimates of maternal and paternal genomic imprinting heritability. Cochran’s Q test and the I² statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies, while Egger’s test was used to evaluate publication bias. A Baujat plot was generated to quantify each study's contribution to overall heterogeneity (OHT) and the weighted parental genomic imprinting heritability estimates (WHE) for each trait. The weighted coefficients of variation varied from 9.51 % for the Kleiber ratio (KR) to 23.57 % for the average daily gain (ADG). The weighted average hmi2 ranged between 0.015 for KR and 0.111 for birth weight (BWT), while the mean hpi2 ranged from 0.015 for ADG to 0.049 for weaning weight (WWT). Additionally, the hmi2 estimates for BWT and six-month weight (SMWT) as well as the hpi2 estimates for BWT and KR displayed significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05). The incorporation of genomic imprinting effects into genetic models increased the direct heritability (h2) of BWT by 4.72 %. However, the h2 values for the other traits decreased significantly, with a reduction of 33 % for SMWT and up to 93 % for yearling weight (YWT). The I² index revealed high heterogeneity for the hmi2 estimate of BWT (86.30 %), but moderate heterogeneity for KR (41.5 %) and SMWT (58.10 %). For hpi2, significant heterogeneity was found in BWT (70.90 %) and KR (61.32 %), whereas SMWT showed moderate heterogeneity (36.47 %). The Baujat plot revealed that the estimate of 0.120 ± 0.023 (Ghafouri-Kesbi et al., 2022b_Data set1) significantly contributed to the OHT of weighted hmi2 for BWT, WWT, YWT, and ADG, while it had a significant effect on both WHE and OHT concerning the mean value of hpi2 for SMWT. These findings support the integration of genomic imprinting effects in selection models to improve breeding outcomes.
小型反刍动物生长性状直接和基因组印迹遗传力的meta分析
一项随机效应荟萃分析汇集了已发表的关于小型反刍动物经济上重要性状的母系和父系基因组印迹遗传力(hmi2和hpi2)的估计。10篇科学论文(2017-2024)得出了96个母体和父亲基因组印记遗传力的估计。采用Cochran’s Q检验和I²统计量评估研究的异质性,采用Egger’s检验评估发表偏倚。生成Baujat图来量化每个研究对总体异质性(OHT)的贡献以及每个性状的加权亲本基因组印迹遗传力估计(WHE)。克莱伯比(KR)和平均日增重(ADG)的加权变异系数分别为9.51%和23.57%。出生体重(BWT)加权平均hmi2介于0.015 ~ 0.111之间,平均平均hpi2介于0.015 ~ 0.049之间。此外,BWT和6个月体重(SMWT)的hmi2估计值以及BWT和KR的hpi2估计值显示出显著的异质性(P < 0.05)。将基因组印迹效应纳入遗传模型后,BWT的直接遗传力(h2)提高了4.72%。然而,其他性状的h2值显著下降,SMWT下降33%,YWT下降93%。I²指数显示BWT的hmi2估计具有高度异质性(86.30%),但KR(41.5%)和SMWT(58.10%)的异质性中等。对于hpi2, BWT(70.90%)和KR(61.32%)存在显著异质性,而SMWT表现出中度异质性(36.47%)。Baujat图显示,0.120±0.023 (Ghafouri-Kesbi et al., 2022b_Data set1)的估计对BWT、WWT、YWT和ADG的加权hmi2的OHT有显著影响,而对SMWT的hpi2平均值的WHE和OHT都有显著影响。这些发现支持在选择模型中整合基因组印记效应以改善育种结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Small Ruminant Research
Small Ruminant Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Small Ruminant Research publishes original, basic and applied research articles, technical notes, and review articles on research relating to goats, sheep, deer, the New World camelids llama, alpaca, vicuna and guanaco, and the Old World camels. Topics covered include nutrition, physiology, anatomy, genetics, microbiology, ethology, product technology, socio-economics, management, sustainability and environment, veterinary medicine and husbandry engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书