Salivary cytokines in stress research: Reactivity kinetics in response to placebo-controlled acute psychosocial stress and associations with plasma cytokines and endocrine stress markers

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Marvin Fischer , Lisa-Marie Walther , Angelina Gideon , Christine Sauter , Christiane Waller , Ivano Amelio , Petra H. Wirtz
{"title":"Salivary cytokines in stress research: Reactivity kinetics in response to placebo-controlled acute psychosocial stress and associations with plasma cytokines and endocrine stress markers","authors":"Marvin Fischer ,&nbsp;Lisa-Marie Walther ,&nbsp;Angelina Gideon ,&nbsp;Christine Sauter ,&nbsp;Christiane Waller ,&nbsp;Ivano Amelio ,&nbsp;Petra H. Wirtz","doi":"10.1016/j.bbi.2025.106100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>In stress research, the measurement of cytokines from saliva may provide a non-invasive alternative to blood sampling. However, current research is limited by methodological shortcomings, including lack of placebo-stress control groups, comparison with plasma cytokine stress reactivity, infrequent sampling, and insufficient control for salivary flow rate. The aim of this study was to investigate repeatedly measured salivary cytokine responses to the Trier-Social-Stress-Test (TSST) compared to a placebo-TSST (PlacTSST), and to explore associations with plasma cytokines and endocrine stress markers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this placebo-controlled, single-blind, between-subject study, healthy young men were randomized to a stress condition (TSST;<em>n</em> = 30) or a placebo-stress condition (PlacTSST;<em>n</em> = 20). Salivary interleukin-(IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor-necrosis-factor-(TNF)-α were measured at baseline and repeatedly up to 30 min post-stress, with correction for salivary flow rate. Plasma cytokines were assessed up to 90 min post-stress. Salivary cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were assessed to explore potential endocrine mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The TSST induced significantly greater increases in salivary IL-6 (<em>p</em> = 0.024, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.07) and IL-1β (<em>p</em> = 0.031, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.07) compared to the PlacTSST, with peak responses at + 1 min post-stress and return to baseline by + 30 min. TNF-α was not stress-reactive, neither in saliva (<em>p</em> = 0.35) nor in plasma (<em>p</em> = 0.16). Higher total salivary IL-6 reactivity predicted higher plasma IL-6 reactivity (β = 0.48, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.31), with salivary responses preceding those in plasma. Higher norepinephrine increases related to higher salivary IL-1β responses (β = 0.45, <em>p</em> = 0.018, ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.15), pointing to a potential noradrenergic modulation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings demonstrate that acute psychosocial stress induces rapid and transient independent increases in salivary IL-6 and IL-1β but not TNF-α that relate to plasma cytokine and endocrine changes. These results support the utility of salivary cytokine assessment as a sensitive and non-invasive and less cost-intensive alternative to plasma sampling. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying regulatory mechanisms and extend findings to different populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9199,"journal":{"name":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 106100"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159125003411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives

In stress research, the measurement of cytokines from saliva may provide a non-invasive alternative to blood sampling. However, current research is limited by methodological shortcomings, including lack of placebo-stress control groups, comparison with plasma cytokine stress reactivity, infrequent sampling, and insufficient control for salivary flow rate. The aim of this study was to investigate repeatedly measured salivary cytokine responses to the Trier-Social-Stress-Test (TSST) compared to a placebo-TSST (PlacTSST), and to explore associations with plasma cytokines and endocrine stress markers.

Methods

In this placebo-controlled, single-blind, between-subject study, healthy young men were randomized to a stress condition (TSST;n = 30) or a placebo-stress condition (PlacTSST;n = 20). Salivary interleukin-(IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor-necrosis-factor-(TNF)-α were measured at baseline and repeatedly up to 30 min post-stress, with correction for salivary flow rate. Plasma cytokines were assessed up to 90 min post-stress. Salivary cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were assessed to explore potential endocrine mechanisms.

Results

The TSST induced significantly greater increases in salivary IL-6 (p = 0.024, ηp2 = 0.07) and IL-1β (p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.07) compared to the PlacTSST, with peak responses at + 1 min post-stress and return to baseline by + 30 min. TNF-α was not stress-reactive, neither in saliva (p = 0.35) nor in plasma (p = 0.16). Higher total salivary IL-6 reactivity predicted higher plasma IL-6 reactivity (β = 0.48, p < 0.001, ΔR2 = 0.31), with salivary responses preceding those in plasma. Higher norepinephrine increases related to higher salivary IL-1β responses (β = 0.45, p = 0.018, ΔR2 = 0.15), pointing to a potential noradrenergic modulation.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that acute psychosocial stress induces rapid and transient independent increases in salivary IL-6 and IL-1β but not TNF-α that relate to plasma cytokine and endocrine changes. These results support the utility of salivary cytokine assessment as a sensitive and non-invasive and less cost-intensive alternative to plasma sampling. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying regulatory mechanisms and extend findings to different populations.
唾液细胞因子在应激研究中的作用:对安慰剂控制的急性社会心理应激反应的反应动力学以及与血浆细胞因子和内分泌应激标志物的关联
背景/目的在应激研究中,从唾液中测量细胞因子可能提供一种非侵入性的血液采样替代方法。然而,目前的研究受到方法学缺陷的限制,包括缺乏安慰剂应激对照组,血浆细胞因子应激反应性的比较,采样频率低,唾液流速控制不足。本研究的目的是研究反复测量的唾液细胞因子对特里尔-社会压力测试(TSST)的反应,并将其与安慰剂-TSST (PlacTSST)进行比较,并探讨血浆细胞因子和内分泌压力标志物的关系。方法在这项安慰剂对照、单盲、受试者之间的研究中,健康的年轻男性被随机分为应激状态(TSST, n = 30)和安慰剂-应激状态(PlacTSST, n = 20)。唾液白细胞介素-(IL)-6、IL-1β、肿瘤坏死因子-(TNF)-α在应激后30分钟的基线和重复测量,并校正唾液流速。在应激后90分钟评估血浆细胞因子。评估唾液皮质醇、肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素以探索潜在的内分泌机制。结果TSST诱导小鼠唾液IL-6 (p = 0.024, ηp2 = 0.07)和IL-1β (p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.07)显著高于PlacTSST,且在应激后+ 1 min达到峰值,+ 30 min恢复至基线水平。TNF-α在唾液(p = 0.35)和血浆(p = 0.16)中均无应激反应。较高的唾液IL-6总反应性预示着较高的血浆IL-6反应性(β = 0.48, p < 0.001, ΔR2 = 0.31),唾液反应先于血浆反应。较高的去甲肾上腺素增加与较高的唾液IL-1β反应相关(β = 0.45, p = 0.018, ΔR2 = 0.15),表明可能存在去甲肾上腺素能调节。结论急性社会心理应激可引起唾液IL-6和IL-1β快速、短暂的独立升高,而与血浆细胞因子和内分泌变化相关的TNF-α无明显升高。这些结果支持唾液细胞因子评估作为一种敏感、无创、成本较低的血浆取样替代方法的效用。需要进一步的研究来阐明潜在的调节机制,并将研究结果扩展到不同的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1987, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity proudly serves as the official journal of the Psychoneuroimmunology Research Society (PNIRS). This pioneering journal is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed basic, experimental, and clinical studies that explore the intricate interactions among behavioral, neural, endocrine, and immune systems in both humans and animals. As an international and interdisciplinary platform, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity focuses on original research spanning neuroscience, immunology, integrative physiology, behavioral biology, psychiatry, psychology, and clinical medicine. The journal is inclusive of research conducted at various levels, including molecular, cellular, social, and whole organism perspectives. With a commitment to efficiency, the journal facilitates online submission and review, ensuring timely publication of experimental results. Manuscripts typically undergo peer review and are returned to authors within 30 days of submission. It's worth noting that Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, published eight times a year, does not impose submission fees or page charges, fostering an open and accessible platform for scientific discourse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信