Influence of Enhancement Filter Application in Panoramic Radiographs in the Detection of External Root Resorption in Mandibular Second Molars Caused by Impacted Third Molars.

Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Lucas da Silva Ponce, Thaisa Pinheiro Silva, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontelene, Amanda Farias-Gomes, Matheus L Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas
{"title":"Influence of Enhancement Filter Application in Panoramic Radiographs in the Detection of External Root Resorption in Mandibular Second Molars Caused by Impacted Third Molars.","authors":"Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Lucas da Silva Ponce, Thaisa Pinheiro Silva, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontelene, Amanda Farias-Gomes, Matheus L Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01671-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the influence of enhancement filters on panoramic radiographs for the detection of external root resorption (ERR) in lower second molars caused by impacted third molars. One hundred and twenty-four panoramic radiographs with 182 lower third molars were selected. The corresponding cone-beam computed tomography scans were assessed to create the reference standard. The panoramic radiographs were then exported with and without four enhancement filters (Sharpness, Invert, Invert + Sharpness, and Equalized + Magnification) and independently evaluated by five examiners using a five-point scale for ERR presence. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated, and differences between filters were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were assessed using weighted Kappa index. Diagnostic values were similar across filters for AUC (0.56 to 0.61; p = 0.359), but sensitivity was lower (0.25 to 0.50; p = 0.004) and specificity higher (p = 0.002) for the Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters than for the other situations. Intra-examiner agreement was moderate, while inter-examiner agreement was fair. The diagnostic accuracy of ERR in mandibular second molars on panoramic radiographs is unaffected by filters, but sensitivity decreases with Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01671-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of enhancement filters on panoramic radiographs for the detection of external root resorption (ERR) in lower second molars caused by impacted third molars. One hundred and twenty-four panoramic radiographs with 182 lower third molars were selected. The corresponding cone-beam computed tomography scans were assessed to create the reference standard. The panoramic radiographs were then exported with and without four enhancement filters (Sharpness, Invert, Invert + Sharpness, and Equalized + Magnification) and independently evaluated by five examiners using a five-point scale for ERR presence. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated, and differences between filters were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were assessed using weighted Kappa index. Diagnostic values were similar across filters for AUC (0.56 to 0.61; p = 0.359), but sensitivity was lower (0.25 to 0.50; p = 0.004) and specificity higher (p = 0.002) for the Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters than for the other situations. Intra-examiner agreement was moderate, while inter-examiner agreement was fair. The diagnostic accuracy of ERR in mandibular second molars on panoramic radiographs is unaffected by filters, but sensitivity decreases with Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters.

全景x线片增强滤光片对第三磨牙阻生所致下颌第二磨牙外牙根吸收的影响。
目的探讨增强滤光片对第三磨牙阻生后下第二磨牙外根吸收(ERR)的检测效果。选取了182颗下第三磨牙的124张全景x线片。评估相应的锥束计算机断层扫描以创建参考标准。然后导出有或没有四种增强滤镜(锐度、反转、反转+锐度和均衡+放大)的全景x线照片,并由五名审查员使用五分制对ERR的存在进行独立评估。计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性,并采用方差分析和Tukey检验分析各过滤器之间的差异。使用加权Kappa指数评估审查员之间和审查员之间的协议。不同过滤器对AUC的诊断值相似(0.56至0.61,p = 0.359),但与其他情况相比,Invert和Invert + sharuity过滤器的敏感性较低(0.25至0.50,p = 0.004),特异性较高(p = 0.002)。审查员内部的一致性为中等,审查员之间的一致性为中等。在全景x线片上诊断下颌第二磨牙ERR的准确性不受滤光片的影响,但使用Invert滤光片和Invert + sharuity滤光片的敏感性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信