Evaluating quality improvement in tertiary care hospital before and after NABH accreditation: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1654514
Deepika Kanyal, Babaji Ghewade
{"title":"Evaluating quality improvement in tertiary care hospital before and after NABH accreditation: a systematic review.","authors":"Deepika Kanyal, Babaji Ghewade","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1654514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH.) accreditation process aims to elevate the quality of healthcare services through an impartial, external peer evaluation of an organization's performance. This study compares NABH. quality indicators in a tertiary care hospital before and after accreditation, assessing changes in patient care, hospital management, and staff performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Literature was searched across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from August 2023 to January 2024. Keywords included \"NABH. accreditation and hospital quality,\" \"Accreditation in Indian hospitals and patient safety,\" and \"Tertiary care hospital before and after accreditation.\" Boolean operators, synonyms, and related terms were used to ensure comprehensive retrieval. Independent reviewers screened studies, and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study highlights significant improvements in hospital quality indicators following NABH accreditation. Hospital-acquired infection rates decreased, with infection control compliance improving by 40%. Operational efficiency improved with a 20% reduction in discharge delays and a 15% increase in documentation accuracy. Patient satisfaction scores rose by 25%, and structured policies enhanced service quality by 30%. Additionally, 85% of hospital staff reported higher job satisfaction. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in compliance rates (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and patient care metrics (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Despite initial implementation challenges due to resource constraints, the study underscores the need for continuous monitoring and reinforcement of accreditation standards to sustain these improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NABH accreditation improves patient safety, lowers infection rates, and boosts overall productivity. The structured framework encourages continuous improvement, but institutional commitment and ongoing oversight are necessary for long-term sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1654514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1654514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH.) accreditation process aims to elevate the quality of healthcare services through an impartial, external peer evaluation of an organization's performance. This study compares NABH. quality indicators in a tertiary care hospital before and after accreditation, assessing changes in patient care, hospital management, and staff performance.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Literature was searched across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from August 2023 to January 2024. Keywords included "NABH. accreditation and hospital quality," "Accreditation in Indian hospitals and patient safety," and "Tertiary care hospital before and after accreditation." Boolean operators, synonyms, and related terms were used to ensure comprehensive retrieval. Independent reviewers screened studies, and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Results: The study highlights significant improvements in hospital quality indicators following NABH accreditation. Hospital-acquired infection rates decreased, with infection control compliance improving by 40%. Operational efficiency improved with a 20% reduction in discharge delays and a 15% increase in documentation accuracy. Patient satisfaction scores rose by 25%, and structured policies enhanced service quality by 30%. Additionally, 85% of hospital staff reported higher job satisfaction. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in compliance rates (p < 0.05) and patient care metrics (p < 0.01). Despite initial implementation challenges due to resource constraints, the study underscores the need for continuous monitoring and reinforcement of accreditation standards to sustain these improvements.

Conclusion: NABH accreditation improves patient safety, lowers infection rates, and boosts overall productivity. The structured framework encourages continuous improvement, but institutional commitment and ongoing oversight are necessary for long-term sustainability.

Abstract Image

评价三级保健医院在NABH认证前后的质量改进:一项系统审查。
背景:国家医院和医疗保健提供者认证委员会(NABH)认证过程旨在通过对组织绩效进行公正的外部同行评估来提高医疗保健服务的质量。这项研究比较了NABH。三级护理医院认证前后的质量指标,评估患者护理、医院管理和员工绩效的变化。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。从2023年8月到2024年1月,在PubMed、Scopus、b谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library中检索了文献。关键词:“NABH”;认证和医院质量”,“印度医院认证和患者安全”,以及“三级保健医院认证前后”。使用布尔运算符、同义词和相关术语来确保全面检索。独立审稿人筛选研究,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具进行偏倚风险评估。结果:研究强调了NABH认证后医院质量指标的显著改善。医院获得性感染率下降,感染控制依从性提高了40%。作业效率提高了20%,排放延迟减少了20%,记录准确性提高了15%。患者满意度得分提高了25%,结构化政策使服务质量提高了30%。此外,85%的医院员工表示工作满意度更高。结论:NABH认证提高了患者安全,降低了感染率,提高了整体生产力。结构框架鼓励持续改进,但体制承诺和持续监督是长期可持续性所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信