Validation of an AI-aided 3D method for enhanced volumetric quantification of external root resorption in orthodontics.

IF 3.2
The Angle orthodontist Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.2319/092324-781.1
Teresa Baena-de la Iglesia, Estrella Navarro-Fraile, Alejandro Iglesias-Linares
{"title":"Validation of an AI-aided 3D method for enhanced volumetric quantification of external root resorption in orthodontics.","authors":"Teresa Baena-de la Iglesia, Estrella Navarro-Fraile, Alejandro Iglesias-Linares","doi":"10.2319/092324-781.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare and validate two tridimensional diagnostic methods for quantifying and categorizing external root resorption using an artificial intelligence (AI)-aided, automatic, or manual digital segmentation process.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>40 teeth were segmented from 10 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) records from five patients. Stereolithographic files were created, and automatic, manual, or AI-aided segmentation of each incisor was performed by two double-blinded operators. Two quantification methods were used and compared by analyzing final segmented regions of the tooth. This study followed QAREL (Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability) and COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Reproducibility was assessed using the Dahlberg formula, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (<i>P</i> value < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and interobserver correlations were high (ICC: > 0.736; <i>P</i> < .01). Statistically significant differences were found between the two measurement methods for high-quality CBCT images of central incisors, mainly at the level of the apical third. Specific differences were found between methods when root resorption was evaluated in the middle and apical thirds using AI segmentation of the central incisor (<i>P</i> = .043). When referring to total volume loss of the lateral incisor, differences (<i>P</i> = .021) were observed between methods when segmented by manual or AI-aided procedures. Highest specificity (100%) was observed for AI-aided segmentation and Method 2 for evaluation of root resorption at the apical third volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of root resorption with CBCT is highly dependent on CBCT definition, type of segmentation, and measurement method. Three-dimensional (3D) measurement method described by three landmark points yielded satisfactory results using any tested segmentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"95 5","pages":"474-482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/092324-781.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare and validate two tridimensional diagnostic methods for quantifying and categorizing external root resorption using an artificial intelligence (AI)-aided, automatic, or manual digital segmentation process.

Materials and methods: 40 teeth were segmented from 10 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) records from five patients. Stereolithographic files were created, and automatic, manual, or AI-aided segmentation of each incisor was performed by two double-blinded operators. Two quantification methods were used and compared by analyzing final segmented regions of the tooth. This study followed QAREL (Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability) and COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Reproducibility was assessed using the Dahlberg formula, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (P value < .05).

Results: Intra- and interobserver correlations were high (ICC: > 0.736; P < .01). Statistically significant differences were found between the two measurement methods for high-quality CBCT images of central incisors, mainly at the level of the apical third. Specific differences were found between methods when root resorption was evaluated in the middle and apical thirds using AI segmentation of the central incisor (P = .043). When referring to total volume loss of the lateral incisor, differences (P = .021) were observed between methods when segmented by manual or AI-aided procedures. Highest specificity (100%) was observed for AI-aided segmentation and Method 2 for evaluation of root resorption at the apical third volume.

Conclusions: Assessment of root resorption with CBCT is highly dependent on CBCT definition, type of segmentation, and measurement method. Three-dimensional (3D) measurement method described by three landmark points yielded satisfactory results using any tested segmentations.

人工智能辅助的三维方法在正畸治疗中增强外牙根吸收体积量化的验证。
目的:比较和验证使用人工智能(AI)辅助、自动或手动数字分割过程对外牙根吸收进行量化和分类的两种三维诊断方法。材料与方法:对5例患者的10张锥形束ct (cone beam computed tomography, CBCT)记录的40颗牙齿进行分割。创建立体光刻文件,并由两名双盲操作人员自动,手动或人工智能辅助分割每个门牙。采用两种量化方法,并通过分析牙齿的最终分割区域进行比较。本研究遵循QAREL(诊断可靠性质量评价)和COSMIN(基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准)指南。采用Dahlberg公式、变异系数和类内相关系数(ICC)评价重现性(P值< 0.05)。结果:观察者内部和观察者之间的相关性很高(ICC: > 0.736; P < 0.01)。两种测量方法对中切牙高质量CBCT图像的测量差异有统计学意义,主要在尖三分之一水平。使用人工智能分割中切牙评估中三分之一和根尖三分之一牙根吸收时,两种方法之间存在明显差异(P = 0.043)。当涉及到侧切牙的总体积损失时,采用人工或人工智能辅助程序进行分割时,两种方法的差异(P = 0.021)。人工智能辅助分割和方法2用于评估根尖第三体积根吸收的特异性最高(100%)。结论:用CBCT评估牙根吸收高度依赖于CBCT的定义、分割类型和测量方法。三维(3D)测量方法由三个地标点描述,使用任何测试的分割都可以获得满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信