Communicating Diversity: (Cognitive) Ableism in Information-Seeking Research.

Autism in adulthood : challenges and management Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1089/aut.2024.0077
Rebekah L Cowell
{"title":"Communicating Diversity: (Cognitive) Ableism in Information-Seeking Research.","authors":"Rebekah L Cowell","doi":"10.1089/aut.2024.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The applied science of Library and Information Science (LIS) has long emphasized understanding user behaviors in information-seeking processes, particularly in higher education environments where new information and research are generated. However, a notable gap exists in the literature regarding the information-seeking and information-use experiences of autistic and neurodivergent students and adults, impacting an interconnected network of relationships between researchers, librarians, LIS students, and postsecondary students seeking support and services. In LIS, research informs practice, and information-seeking is a cognitive and learning process, especially prescient in academic institutions. The failure to address the information needs of autistic, neurodivergent, and disabled people in LIS research and LIS curricula, which educates future librarians, impoverishes both practitioners and students. Drawing from personal experiences and empirical data, the author highlights the prevalence of neurodivergent students in higher education and investigates why, despite a growing awareness of neurodiversity, LIS research, scholarship, and program curricula largely overlook the specific needs of neurodivergent individuals. The article asks questions and proposes ideas for facing the consequences of an incomplete LIS education, addressing the necessity of introducing inclusive pedagogical practices in the academic library and getting honest about the field's cognitively biased scholarship because we cannot understand the information behavior landscape in all its neurobiological variations nor anticipate the future of information use and creation if we have bypassed neurodivergent and autistic minds.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"7 4","pages":"344-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The applied science of Library and Information Science (LIS) has long emphasized understanding user behaviors in information-seeking processes, particularly in higher education environments where new information and research are generated. However, a notable gap exists in the literature regarding the information-seeking and information-use experiences of autistic and neurodivergent students and adults, impacting an interconnected network of relationships between researchers, librarians, LIS students, and postsecondary students seeking support and services. In LIS, research informs practice, and information-seeking is a cognitive and learning process, especially prescient in academic institutions. The failure to address the information needs of autistic, neurodivergent, and disabled people in LIS research and LIS curricula, which educates future librarians, impoverishes both practitioners and students. Drawing from personal experiences and empirical data, the author highlights the prevalence of neurodivergent students in higher education and investigates why, despite a growing awareness of neurodiversity, LIS research, scholarship, and program curricula largely overlook the specific needs of neurodivergent individuals. The article asks questions and proposes ideas for facing the consequences of an incomplete LIS education, addressing the necessity of introducing inclusive pedagogical practices in the academic library and getting honest about the field's cognitively biased scholarship because we cannot understand the information behavior landscape in all its neurobiological variations nor anticipate the future of information use and creation if we have bypassed neurodivergent and autistic minds.

沟通多样性:信息寻求研究中的认知障碍。
长期以来,图书馆与信息科学(LIS)的应用科学一直强调理解信息寻求过程中的用户行为,特别是在产生新信息和研究的高等教育环境中。然而,关于自闭症和神经分化学生和成人的信息寻求和信息使用经验的文献存在显著差距,影响了研究人员、图书馆员、LIS学生和寻求支持和服务的大专学生之间的相互联系网络。在美国,研究为实践提供信息,信息寻求是一个认知和学习的过程,在学术机构中尤其具有先见之明。在教育未来图书馆员的LIS研究和课程中,未能解决自闭症、神经分化和残疾人的信息需求,使从业人员和学生都陷入贫困。根据个人经验和实证数据,作者强调了神经分化学生在高等教育中的普遍存在,并调查了为什么尽管人们对神经多样性的认识日益增强,但LIS的研究、奖学金和课程设置在很大程度上忽视了神经分化个体的特殊需求。本文提出了一些问题,并提出了一些想法,以面对不完整的LIS教育的后果,解决在学术图书馆引入包容性教学实践的必要性,并诚实地对待该领域的认知偏见学术,因为我们无法理解所有神经生物学变异的信息行为景观,也无法预测信息使用和创造的未来,如果我们绕过神经分化和自闭症的思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信