Comparing Disclosure and Supports used by Higher-Education Students with Neurodivergent or Mental Health Conditions.

Autism in adulthood : challenges and management Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1089/aut.2024.0118
Lyndel J Kennedy, Amanda L Richdale, Lauren P Lawson
{"title":"Comparing Disclosure and Supports used by Higher-Education Students with Neurodivergent or Mental Health Conditions.","authors":"Lyndel J Kennedy, Amanda L Richdale, Lauren P Lawson","doi":"10.1089/aut.2024.0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retention and academic success are associated with accessing supports for students with disabilities and/or mental health conditions (MHCs); however, many students do not disclose to their institution. While disclosure and supports use have been investigated for Autistic students, less is known about other neurodivergent students, those with multiple minority identities, and whether this differs from the experiences of non-neurodivergent students with MHCs (NND-MHCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the bioecological framework, we investigated disclosure experiences and supports use for neurodivergent and NND-MHC students via an anonymous online survey capturing diagnoses, disclosure experiences, supports usage, and new supports wanted from 131 neurodivergent and 42 NND-MHC Australian and New Zealand higher education (HE) students. Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher's Exact tests were used to compare neuro groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neurodivergent participants were grouped into Autistic, Attention Deficity/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autistic-and-ADHD (AuDHD), and ND-other. More AuDHD students disclosed to their institution than NND-MHC (83%-19%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similar proportions of neurodivergent and NND-MHC students found disclosure helpful and intended to disclose in the future. Minority-identity scores differed significantly, but did not affect disclosure. More AuDHD students (74%) accessed supports than the other groups (38%-58%), but this was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.074). There were significant group differences in use of note-takers, extended time for examinations/assignments, computer use in examinations, group project alternatives, and modified orientation. NND-MHC students reported lower overall supports use than the neurodivergent groups, <i>p</i> = 0.028. Support helpfulness ratings were similar for neurodivergent (95%) and NND-MHC (96%) students. Neurodivergent groups (77%-87%) wanted new neurodivergent-specific supports in both structured and unstructured formats, with neurodivergent mentors/facilitators preferred by the Autistic, ADHD, and AuDHD groups, 50%-71%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Apart from the AuDHD group, less than half of eligible students disclose to their institution or use supports, but when they do, they find them helpful. A more nuanced understanding of neurodivergent students' support needs is required to improve their HE experience and completion rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"7 4","pages":"462-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retention and academic success are associated with accessing supports for students with disabilities and/or mental health conditions (MHCs); however, many students do not disclose to their institution. While disclosure and supports use have been investigated for Autistic students, less is known about other neurodivergent students, those with multiple minority identities, and whether this differs from the experiences of non-neurodivergent students with MHCs (NND-MHCs).

Methods: Using the bioecological framework, we investigated disclosure experiences and supports use for neurodivergent and NND-MHC students via an anonymous online survey capturing diagnoses, disclosure experiences, supports usage, and new supports wanted from 131 neurodivergent and 42 NND-MHC Australian and New Zealand higher education (HE) students. Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher's Exact tests were used to compare neuro groups.

Results: Neurodivergent participants were grouped into Autistic, Attention Deficity/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autistic-and-ADHD (AuDHD), and ND-other. More AuDHD students disclosed to their institution than NND-MHC (83%-19%, p < 0.001). Similar proportions of neurodivergent and NND-MHC students found disclosure helpful and intended to disclose in the future. Minority-identity scores differed significantly, but did not affect disclosure. More AuDHD students (74%) accessed supports than the other groups (38%-58%), but this was not significant (p = 0.074). There were significant group differences in use of note-takers, extended time for examinations/assignments, computer use in examinations, group project alternatives, and modified orientation. NND-MHC students reported lower overall supports use than the neurodivergent groups, p = 0.028. Support helpfulness ratings were similar for neurodivergent (95%) and NND-MHC (96%) students. Neurodivergent groups (77%-87%) wanted new neurodivergent-specific supports in both structured and unstructured formats, with neurodivergent mentors/facilitators preferred by the Autistic, ADHD, and AuDHD groups, 50%-71%.

Conclusion: Apart from the AuDHD group, less than half of eligible students disclose to their institution or use supports, but when they do, they find them helpful. A more nuanced understanding of neurodivergent students' support needs is required to improve their HE experience and completion rates.

比较具有神经发散性或心理健康状况的高等教育学生使用的信息披露和支持。
背景:留校和学业成功与残疾和/或精神健康状况(MHCs)学生获得支持有关;然而,许多学生并没有向他们的学校透露。虽然已经对自闭症学生的信息披露和支持使用进行了调查,但对其他具有多种少数民族身份的神经分化学生,以及这是否与患有MHCs的非神经分化学生(NND-MHCs)的经历不同,了解较少。方法:采用生物生态学框架,通过匿名在线调查,对澳大利亚和新西兰131名神经发散型和42名NND-MHC高等教育(HE)学生的诊断、披露经历、支持使用和新支持需求进行了调查。Kruskal-Wallis、卡方检验和Fisher’s Exact检验用于神经组的比较。结果:神经发散性参与者分为自闭症、注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)、自闭症-多动症(ADHD)和nd-其他。与NND-MHC相比,更多的adhd学生向他们的学校透露信息(83%-19%,p < 0.001)。相似比例的神经发散型和NND-MHC学生认为披露有帮助,并打算在未来披露。少数民族认同得分差异显著,但不影响披露。获得支持的adhd学生(74%)多于其他组(38%-58%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.074)。在使用笔记员、延长考试/作业时间、考试中使用电脑、小组项目替代方案和修改方向方面,组间存在显著差异。NND-MHC学生报告的总体支持使用低于神经分化组,p = 0.028。神经发散性学生(95%)和NND-MHC学生(96%)的支持帮助评分相似。神经分化组(77%-87%)需要结构化和非结构化形式的新的神经分化特异性支持,自闭症、ADHD和ADHD组更喜欢神经分化导师/促进者(50%-71%)。结论:除了adhd组,不到一半的符合条件的学生向他们的学校透露或使用支持,但当他们这样做时,他们发现他们很有帮助。为了提高他们的高等教育体验和完成率,需要更细致地了解神经发散学生的支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信