Neoadjuvant therapy plus thulium laser transurethral bladder tumor resection for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2024.0065
Honglin Zhong, Wei He, Miao Mo, Shiyu Tong, Yinzhao Wang, Yuhang Wang, Xuhao Liu, Wenhao Zhu, Zhengchao Shen, Zhongfu Huang, Zhenyu Ou, Minfeng Chen
{"title":"Neoadjuvant therapy plus thulium laser transurethral bladder tumor resection for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Honglin Zhong, Wei He, Miao Mo, Shiyu Tong, Yinzhao Wang, Yuhang Wang, Xuhao Liu, Wenhao Zhu, Zhengchao Shen, Zhongfu Huang, Zhenyu Ou, Minfeng Chen","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2024.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, its high perioperative mortality and significant impact on quality of life have led many patients to opt for bladder-preserving approaches, which currently lack a standardized treatment protocol.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of bladder-preserving therapy using thulium laser maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) combined with neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy in MIBC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 46 MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by thulium laser maximal TURBT at a single center between January 2021 and October 2024. Patients had received neoadjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy or antibody-drug conjugate before maximal thulium laser TURBT. Those who achieved a complete clinical response were allowed to pursue either bladder preservation or RC. Patients choosing bladder-preserving therapy were either given maintenance immunotherapy or put on observation. Bladder-intact disease-free survival (BIDFS) was assessed through Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression identified factors influencing BIDFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 46 patients, 95.7% remained alive, and 82.6% demonstrated no evidence of cancer with bladder function preserved. The estimated 2-year BIDFS rate was 84.2%, and T stage and maintenance immunotherapy were identified as two independent predictors of BIDFS. Patients receiving immunotherapy were at a significantly reduced risk of recurrence compared to their counterparts under observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thulium laser maximal TURBT, combined with neoadjuvant therapy and maintenance immunotherapy, is a promising bladder-preserving approach that helps MIBC patients attain favorable BIDFS and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"12 3","pages":"e21200053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2024.0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, its high perioperative mortality and significant impact on quality of life have led many patients to opt for bladder-preserving approaches, which currently lack a standardized treatment protocol.

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of bladder-preserving therapy using thulium laser maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) combined with neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy in MIBC patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 46 MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by thulium laser maximal TURBT at a single center between January 2021 and October 2024. Patients had received neoadjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy or antibody-drug conjugate before maximal thulium laser TURBT. Those who achieved a complete clinical response were allowed to pursue either bladder preservation or RC. Patients choosing bladder-preserving therapy were either given maintenance immunotherapy or put on observation. Bladder-intact disease-free survival (BIDFS) was assessed through Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression identified factors influencing BIDFS.

Results: Among the 46 patients, 95.7% remained alive, and 82.6% demonstrated no evidence of cancer with bladder function preserved. The estimated 2-year BIDFS rate was 84.2%, and T stage and maintenance immunotherapy were identified as two independent predictors of BIDFS. Patients receiving immunotherapy were at a significantly reduced risk of recurrence compared to their counterparts under observation.

Conclusion: Thulium laser maximal TURBT, combined with neoadjuvant therapy and maintenance immunotherapy, is a promising bladder-preserving approach that helps MIBC patients attain favorable BIDFS and quality of life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新辅助治疗联合铥激光经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌。
背景:根治性膀胱切除术(RC)是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的标准治疗方法。然而,它的高围手术期死亡率和对生活质量的重大影响导致许多患者选择膀胱保留方法,目前缺乏标准化的治疗方案。目的:评价铥激光最大经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)联合新辅助治疗和免疫治疗保膀胱治疗MIBC患者的疗效和可行性。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年10月间接受新辅助治疗后单中心铥激光最大turt治疗的46例MIBC患者。患者在最大铥激光turt前接受新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗或抗体-药物偶联治疗。那些达到完全临床反应的患者被允许进行膀胱保留或RC。选择保膀胱治疗的患者分别给予维持免疫治疗或观察。通过Kaplan-Meier分析评估膀胱完整无病生存期(BIDFS), Cox回归确定影响BIDFS的因素。结果:在46例患者中,95.7%的患者存活,82.6%的患者无膀胱癌证据,但膀胱功能保留。估计2年BIDFS率为84.2%,T期和维持免疫治疗被确定为BIDFS的两个独立预测因素。与接受免疫治疗的患者相比,接受免疫治疗的患者复发风险显著降低。结论:铥激光最大turt联合新辅助治疗和维持免疫治疗是一种有希望的保膀胱方法,可以帮助MIBC患者获得良好的BIDFS和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信