Feeding following cleft palate surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block and greater palatine nerve block.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Vrushali Ponde, Hanna Smeds, Parit Ladani, Jacob Karlsson, Per-Arne Lonnqvist, Srinitya Kollu
{"title":"Feeding following cleft palate surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block and greater palatine nerve block.","authors":"Vrushali Ponde, Hanna Smeds, Parit Ladani, Jacob Karlsson, Per-Arne Lonnqvist, Srinitya Kollu","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the context of cleft-lip and palate surgery, both suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks (SZMNB) and greater palatine nerve blocks (GPNB) have been shown to provide improved postoperative pain relief. In this context, both pain relief and early postoperative feeding are of great importance. However, these two techniques have so far not been properly compared with regard to these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children 1-10 years of age undergoing palate surgery were randomized to either SZMNB or GPNB. Primary aim was early (0-24 hour) postoperative feeding (%) in relation to full normal oral feeding. Secondary aims were postoperative pain scores and need for rescue paracetamol administration (pain score >4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 patients were randomized to each study group (no missing data). Patients in group SZMNB displayed significantly better oral feeding during the first 24 hours compared with the GPNB group (median 80% [range 70-90%] and median 60% [range 40-70], respectively; p<0.00001). Group SZMNB did also show lower pain scores during 0-12 hour postoperatively (p<0.05-0.001) and fewer patients needed rescue paracetamol (p<0.05) compared with the GPNB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks was found superior to greater palatine blocks with regard to the amount of postoperative feeding in children undergoing palate surgery. Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks were also associated with lower postoperative pain scores during the first 12 hours postoperative, further reflected by the reduced need for postoperative rescue administration of intravenous paracetamol.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of cleft-lip and palate surgery, both suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks (SZMNB) and greater palatine nerve blocks (GPNB) have been shown to provide improved postoperative pain relief. In this context, both pain relief and early postoperative feeding are of great importance. However, these two techniques have so far not been properly compared with regard to these characteristics.

Methods: Children 1-10 years of age undergoing palate surgery were randomized to either SZMNB or GPNB. Primary aim was early (0-24 hour) postoperative feeding (%) in relation to full normal oral feeding. Secondary aims were postoperative pain scores and need for rescue paracetamol administration (pain score >4).

Results: 30 patients were randomized to each study group (no missing data). Patients in group SZMNB displayed significantly better oral feeding during the first 24 hours compared with the GPNB group (median 80% [range 70-90%] and median 60% [range 40-70], respectively; p<0.00001). Group SZMNB did also show lower pain scores during 0-12 hour postoperatively (p<0.05-0.001) and fewer patients needed rescue paracetamol (p<0.05) compared with the GPNB group.

Conclusion: The use of bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks was found superior to greater palatine blocks with regard to the amount of postoperative feeding in children undergoing palate surgery. Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks were also associated with lower postoperative pain scores during the first 12 hours postoperative, further reflected by the reduced need for postoperative rescue administration of intravenous paracetamol.

腭裂手术后的喂养:一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较颧上颌神经阻滞和大腭神经阻滞。
简介:在唇腭裂手术的背景下,颧上颌神经阻滞(SZMNB)和大腭神经阻滞(GPNB)已被证明可以改善术后疼痛缓解。在这种情况下,缓解疼痛和术后早期喂养都是非常重要的。然而,迄今为止,这两种技术在这些特性方面还没有得到适当的比较。方法:1-10岁接受上颚手术的儿童随机分为SZMNB组和GPNB组。主要目的是术后早期(0-24小时)喂养(%)相对于完全正常的口服喂养。次要目的是术后疼痛评分和是否需要补给性扑热息痛(疼痛评分bbbb4)。结果:30例患者随机分为每个研究组(无遗漏数据)。与GPNB组相比,SZMNB组患者在前24小时的口腔喂养表现明显更好(中位数分别为80%[范围70-90%]和60%[范围40-70])。结论:在腭裂手术患儿的术后喂养量方面,双侧颧上颌神经阻滞的使用优于大腭阻滞。双侧颧上颌骨神经阻滞也与术后前12小时较低的术后疼痛评分相关,进一步反映在术后静脉注射扑热息痛的必要性减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信