Commentary: Integrative Taxonomy Reveals Freshwater Shrimp Diversity (Decapoda: Atyidae: Neocaridina) from Kyushu and Southern Honshu of Japan, with a Discussion on Introduced Species.

IF 1.4 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Zoological Studies Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6620/ZS.2024.63-53.
Yusuke Fuke
{"title":"Commentary: Integrative Taxonomy Reveals Freshwater Shrimp Diversity (Decapoda: Atyidae: <i>Neocaridina</i>) from Kyushu and Southern Honshu of Japan, with a Discussion on Introduced Species.","authors":"Yusuke Fuke","doi":"10.6620/ZS.2024.63-53.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shih et al. (2024) reported on the detection of <i>Neocaridina</i> species in Japan and their morphological characteristics in <i>Zoological Studies</i>. Eleven taxa were identified based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis and morphological examination. Among these, they identified two taxa that formed sister groups: <i>N. denticulata</i> and <i>N. davidi</i>, which are primarily found in Japan and China. In this commentary, I argue that both species are actually <i>N. davidi</i>. This conclusion was previously drawn by Onuki and Fuke (2022) based on their examination of genome-wide SNPs, mtDNA, and morphological data. The doubts raised about this identification represent a serious issue in terms of conservation, as <i>N. denticulata</i> is a native species, whereas <i>N. davidi</i> is considered an invasive alien species in Japan. Two likely reasons for this misidentification are the oversight of previous studies and the inability to account for the effects of interspecific and intraspecific hybridization. Inaccurate or unsubstantiated identifications pose significant challenges to taxonomy and conservation, underscoring the need for research grounded in reliable methods and well-characterized specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":49331,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Studies","volume":"63 ","pages":"e53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2024.63-53.","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shih et al. (2024) reported on the detection of Neocaridina species in Japan and their morphological characteristics in Zoological Studies. Eleven taxa were identified based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis and morphological examination. Among these, they identified two taxa that formed sister groups: N. denticulata and N. davidi, which are primarily found in Japan and China. In this commentary, I argue that both species are actually N. davidi. This conclusion was previously drawn by Onuki and Fuke (2022) based on their examination of genome-wide SNPs, mtDNA, and morphological data. The doubts raised about this identification represent a serious issue in terms of conservation, as N. denticulata is a native species, whereas N. davidi is considered an invasive alien species in Japan. Two likely reasons for this misidentification are the oversight of previous studies and the inability to account for the effects of interspecific and intraspecific hybridization. Inaccurate or unsubstantiated identifications pose significant challenges to taxonomy and conservation, underscoring the need for research grounded in reliable methods and well-characterized specimens.

评论:综合分类揭示了日本九州和本州南部淡水虾的多样性(十足目:无虾科:新虾目),并讨论了引进种。
Shih et al.(2024)在动物学研究中报道了在日本发现的Neocaridina种及其形态特征。通过线粒体DNA (mtDNA)分析和形态学检查鉴定了11个分类群。其中,他们确定了两个形成姐妹群的分类群:N. denticulata和N. davidi,主要发现于日本和中国。在这篇评论中,我认为这两个物种实际上都是N. davidi。此前Onuki和Fuke(2022)基于对全基因组snp、mtDNA和形态学数据的研究得出了这一结论。对这一鉴定提出的质疑代表了保护方面的一个严重问题,因为denticulata是本土物种,而N. davidi在日本被认为是外来入侵物种。造成这种错误鉴定的两个可能原因是对先前研究的疏忽,以及无法解释种间和种内杂交的影响。不准确或未经证实的鉴定对分类和保护构成重大挑战,强调需要基于可靠的方法和充分表征的标本进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zoological Studies
Zoological Studies 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoological Studies publishes original research papers in five major fields: Animal Behavior, Comparative Physiology, Evolution, Ecology, and Systematics and Biogeography. Manuscripts are welcome from around the world and must be written in English. When the manuscript concerns the use of animals or specimens in research, a statement must be included to the effect that the author(s) has adhered to the legal requirements of the country in which the work was carried out or to any institutional guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信