The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.
Cagri Akpinar, Digdem Kuru Oz, Eriz Ozden, Nuray Haliloglu, Basak Gulpinar, Muhammed Arif Ibis, Muratcan Karaburun, Mehmet Fatih Ozkaya, Efe Turgut, Omer Gulpinar, Mehmet Ilker Gokce, Evren Suer, Sumer Baltaci
{"title":"The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.","authors":"Cagri Akpinar, Digdem Kuru Oz, Eriz Ozden, Nuray Haliloglu, Basak Gulpinar, Muhammed Arif Ibis, Muratcan Karaburun, Mehmet Fatih Ozkaya, Efe Turgut, Omer Gulpinar, Mehmet Ilker Gokce, Evren Suer, Sumer Baltaci","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.
Material and methods: Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.
Conclusion: MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.