Prevention of delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal tumors by secure clipping.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kiyoaki Homma, Shinsuke Nawa, Shunichi Okubo, Makoto Kobayashi, Tadashi Honma, Kiyokazu Homma, Nanako Homma
{"title":"Prevention of delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal tumors by secure clipping.","authors":"Kiyoaki Homma, Shinsuke Nawa, Shunichi Okubo, Makoto Kobayashi, Tadashi Honma, Kiyokazu Homma, Nanako Homma","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12199-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal tumors has been reported to be approximately 1.1-1.7%. Some studies have shown that clipping after EMR does not significantly reduce delayed bleeding. Delayed bleeding after colorectal EMR with clips often occurred due to gaps in the clips or the detachment of mucosal areas that were heavily affected by coagulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To prevent this complication, the perfect closure (PC) technique, with conditions such as secure clipping closely together without any gaps, including not only the ulcer but also the coagulated mucosa as the suture range, and avoiding \"clip-on-clip\" placement as far as possible, is considered important against delayed bleeding after colorectal EMRs. In this study, in order to verify the usefulness of the PC technique, we conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent PC after colorectal EMR was performed in two clinics and three hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1744 lesions (1133 patients) were evaluated. No post-procedural bleeding occurred in any patient. The average number of clips used for one lesion was 4.71 ± 2.04, and the average tumor diameter was 8.0 ± 3.78 (5-26) mm. The rate of post-procedural bleeding was 0%. In addition, the analysis of the results using a Monte Carlo simulation showed medical and economic advantages compared to previous studies in which clip closure was performed after colonic EMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PC has the potential to be an excellent method for preventing postoperative bleeding after colorectal EMRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12199-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal tumors has been reported to be approximately 1.1-1.7%. Some studies have shown that clipping after EMR does not significantly reduce delayed bleeding. Delayed bleeding after colorectal EMR with clips often occurred due to gaps in the clips or the detachment of mucosal areas that were heavily affected by coagulation.

Methods: To prevent this complication, the perfect closure (PC) technique, with conditions such as secure clipping closely together without any gaps, including not only the ulcer but also the coagulated mucosa as the suture range, and avoiding "clip-on-clip" placement as far as possible, is considered important against delayed bleeding after colorectal EMRs. In this study, in order to verify the usefulness of the PC technique, we conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent PC after colorectal EMR was performed in two clinics and three hospitals.

Results: 1744 lesions (1133 patients) were evaluated. No post-procedural bleeding occurred in any patient. The average number of clips used for one lesion was 4.71 ± 2.04, and the average tumor diameter was 8.0 ± 3.78 (5-26) mm. The rate of post-procedural bleeding was 0%. In addition, the analysis of the results using a Monte Carlo simulation showed medical and economic advantages compared to previous studies in which clip closure was performed after colonic EMR.

Conclusion: PC has the potential to be an excellent method for preventing postoperative bleeding after colorectal EMRs.

内镜下结直肠肿瘤粘膜切除术后安全夹持预防迟发性出血。
导读:据报道,内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)后结肠直肠肿瘤的迟发性出血发生率约为1.1-1.7%。一些研究表明,EMR后的剪切术并不能显著减少延迟出血。结直肠夹EMR术后迟发性出血多因夹间隙或受凝血严重影响的粘膜区脱离所致。方法:为了预防这一并发症,采用完美缝合技术,将溃疡和凝固的粘膜紧密地夹在一起,没有任何缝隙,缝合范围不仅包括溃疡,还包括凝固的粘膜,尽可能避免夹对夹的放置,以防止结直肠emr后的延迟出血。在本研究中,为了验证PC技术的有效性,我们对在两家诊所和三家医院进行结直肠EMR后接受PC的患者进行了前瞻性研究。结果:共检查病变1744个(1133例)。无术后出血病例发生。平均一个病灶使用夹数为4.71±2.04,平均肿瘤直径为8.0±3.78 (5-26)mm,术后出血率为0%。此外,使用蒙特卡罗模拟对结果进行分析,与先前在结肠EMR后进行夹子闭合的研究相比,显示了医疗和经济优势。结论:PC有可能成为预防结直肠EMRs术后出血的一种很好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信