Incidental Durotomy Significantly Increases the Risk of Postoperative Infection Following Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Tamara Babasiz, Jannik Leyendecker, Maximilian Weber, Philipp Egenolf, Jürgen Hampl, Ayla Yagdiran, Peer Eysel, Krishnan Sircar
{"title":"Incidental Durotomy Significantly Increases the Risk of Postoperative Infection Following Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tamara Babasiz, Jannik Leyendecker, Maximilian Weber, Philipp Egenolf, Jürgen Hampl, Ayla Yagdiran, Peer Eysel, Krishnan Sircar","doi":"10.14444/8790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accidental dural tear (ADT), an unintended intraoperative breach of the dura mater, is a recognized complication in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. Postoperative surgical site infections are serious adverse outcomes in this context. However, the role of ADT in increasing postoperative infection risk remains insufficiently defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively assess the association between ADT and the occurrence of postoperative infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL from inception to 6 August 2024. Studies involving degenerative lumbar surgery and reporting data on both incidental durotomy and postoperative infections were included. Study quality, including risk of bias analysis, was appraised by 2 independent observers. Subsequently, 2 meta-analyses were conducted, estimating the pooled incidence of infection among patients with ADT and another calculating pooled odds ratios to evaluate infection risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 376,164 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of ADT ranged from 1.9% to 11.8%, with higher rates observed in revision surgeries. Key risk factors included obesity, diabetes, revision surgery, advanced age, and extended operative time. The meta-analysis comprised 7 studies, including 7500 patients with dural tears and 189,058 patients without dural tears. The pooled incidence of postoperative infection among patients with ADT was 13.1% (95% CI: 6.8%-23.8%), which was significantly higher compared with 5.4% (95% CI: 3.1%-7.5%) among patients without ADT (<i>P</i> = 0.00078). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 76.5% for ADT patients and 96.0% for non-ADT patients; Tau<sup>2</sup> = 0.63). A separate meta-analysis of 5 studies reported a pooled odds ratio of 3.86 (95% CI: 2.48-6.3, <i>P</i> < 0.00001), indicating a significantly increased infection risk associated with ADT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADTs during lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions are associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative infections. Although this relationship is multifactorial, affected by surgical complexity and patient comorbidities, these findings underscore the importance of heightened vigilance in infection prevention and control following ADT to reduce infection-related morbidity.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Incidental dural tear during lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions significantly increases the risk for postoperative infection and should be a focus of preventive strategies.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accidental dural tear (ADT), an unintended intraoperative breach of the dura mater, is a recognized complication in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. Postoperative surgical site infections are serious adverse outcomes in this context. However, the role of ADT in increasing postoperative infection risk remains insufficiently defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively assess the association between ADT and the occurrence of postoperative infection.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL from inception to 6 August 2024. Studies involving degenerative lumbar surgery and reporting data on both incidental durotomy and postoperative infections were included. Study quality, including risk of bias analysis, was appraised by 2 independent observers. Subsequently, 2 meta-analyses were conducted, estimating the pooled incidence of infection among patients with ADT and another calculating pooled odds ratios to evaluate infection risk.

Results: Fourteen studies comprising 376,164 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of ADT ranged from 1.9% to 11.8%, with higher rates observed in revision surgeries. Key risk factors included obesity, diabetes, revision surgery, advanced age, and extended operative time. The meta-analysis comprised 7 studies, including 7500 patients with dural tears and 189,058 patients without dural tears. The pooled incidence of postoperative infection among patients with ADT was 13.1% (95% CI: 6.8%-23.8%), which was significantly higher compared with 5.4% (95% CI: 3.1%-7.5%) among patients without ADT (P = 0.00078). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I 2 = 76.5% for ADT patients and 96.0% for non-ADT patients; Tau2 = 0.63). A separate meta-analysis of 5 studies reported a pooled odds ratio of 3.86 (95% CI: 2.48-6.3, P < 0.00001), indicating a significantly increased infection risk associated with ADT.

Conclusion: ADTs during lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions are associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative infections. Although this relationship is multifactorial, affected by surgical complexity and patient comorbidities, these findings underscore the importance of heightened vigilance in infection prevention and control following ADT to reduce infection-related morbidity.

Clinical relevance: Incidental dural tear during lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions significantly increases the risk for postoperative infection and should be a focus of preventive strategies.

Level of evidence: 1:

偶发硬膜切开显著增加腰椎退行性手术后感染的风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:意外硬脑膜撕裂(ADT)是术中意外的硬脑膜破裂,是腰椎退行性疾病手术中公认的并发症。在这种情况下,术后手术部位感染是严重的不良后果。然而,ADT在增加术后感染风险中的作用仍然没有得到充分的定义。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在全面评估ADT与术后感染发生之间的关系。方法:系统检索PubMed、ScienceDirect和CENTRAL网站自成立至2024年8月6日的文献。涉及腰椎退行性手术的研究以及意外硬膜切开和术后感染的报告数据被纳入。研究质量,包括偏倚风险分析,由2名独立观察员评价。随后,进行了2项荟萃分析,估计ADT患者的合并感染发生率,并计算合并优势比来评估感染风险。结果:14项研究包括376164例患者符合纳入标准。ADT的发生率从1.9%到11.8%不等,翻修手术的发生率更高。主要危险因素包括肥胖、糖尿病、翻修手术、高龄和延长手术时间。荟萃分析包括7项研究,包括7500名硬脑膜撕裂患者和189058名无硬脑膜撕裂患者。ADT患者术后感染的总发生率为13.1% (95% CI: 6.8% ~ 23.8%),显著高于无ADT患者的5.4% (95% CI: 3.1% ~ 7.5%) (P = 0.00078)。研究中观察到大量异质性(ADT患者I = 76.5%,非ADT患者I = 96.0%; Tau2 = 0.63)。5项研究的单独荟萃分析报告了合并优势比为3.86 (95% CI: 2.48-6.3, P < 0.00001),表明ADT相关的感染风险显著增加。结论:腰椎退行性疾病手术期间的ADTs与术后感染风险显著增加相关。尽管这种关系是多因素的,受手术复杂性和患者合并症的影响,但这些发现强调了在ADT后提高感染预防和控制警惕以减少感染相关发病率的重要性。临床相关性:腰椎退行性手术中偶发硬脑膜撕裂显著增加术后感染的风险,应成为预防策略的重点。证据等级:1:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信