Return-to-Care After Discharge Directly Home From the PICU: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Leslie A Dervan, Julia A Heneghan, Matt Hall, Daniel H Choi, Adam C Dziorny, Denise M Goodman, Jason M Kane, Joseph G Kohne, Colin M Rogerson, Vanessa Toomey, Daniel Garros, Nadia Roumeliotis
{"title":"Return-to-Care After Discharge Directly Home From the PICU: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Leslie A Dervan, Julia A Heneghan, Matt Hall, Daniel H Choi, Adam C Dziorny, Denise M Goodman, Jason M Kane, Joseph G Kohne, Colin M Rogerson, Vanessa Toomey, Daniel Garros, Nadia Roumeliotis","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the proportion of PICU patients returning to the emergency department (ED) or readmitted within 14 days of hospital discharge, between those discharged directly home from the PICU and those transferred to acute care before discharge home; we hypothesized that rates of return-to-care would be similar.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Propensity-matched multicenter cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Forty-five U.S. hospitals participating in Pediatric Health Information Systems.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children admitted to a non-neonatal cardiac or PICU from 2016 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 560,815 PICU discharges, 150,126 (26.8%) were discharged directly home, although this proportion varied by center (9.8-55.6%). We matched 94,048 children (62.6%) discharged directly home to 153,887 ward-transferred children at admission year, admission type, principal diagnosis, and a propensity score estimating the likelihood of being discharged directly home. Compared with ward-transferred peers, children discharged directly home had similar rates of return-to-ED care (2.9% vs. 3.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [0.89-0.99]) and hospital readmission (4.8% vs. 4.9%; OR, 0.97 [0.94-1.01]) within 14 days. Once readmitted, however, children discharged directly home were more likely to be readmitted to a PICU (2.4% vs. 1.6%; OR, 1.58 [1.49-1.67]). Costs for the index hospitalization were lower for children discharged directly home compared with ward-transferred peers, leading to lower inpatient healthcare costs over 14 days (median, 15,023 [7,614.5-34,294.6] vs. 30,750 [14,558.3-68,830.6]; p ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discharge directly home from the PICU is common; children discharged directly home have comparable likelihood of return-to-ED or inpatient care as matched, ward-discharged peers. Discharge directly home for appropriate patients may provide increased efficiency for healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the proportion of PICU patients returning to the emergency department (ED) or readmitted within 14 days of hospital discharge, between those discharged directly home from the PICU and those transferred to acute care before discharge home; we hypothesized that rates of return-to-care would be similar.

Design: Propensity-matched multicenter cohort study.

Setting: Forty-five U.S. hospitals participating in Pediatric Health Information Systems.

Patients: Children admitted to a non-neonatal cardiac or PICU from 2016 to 2023.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Of 560,815 PICU discharges, 150,126 (26.8%) were discharged directly home, although this proportion varied by center (9.8-55.6%). We matched 94,048 children (62.6%) discharged directly home to 153,887 ward-transferred children at admission year, admission type, principal diagnosis, and a propensity score estimating the likelihood of being discharged directly home. Compared with ward-transferred peers, children discharged directly home had similar rates of return-to-ED care (2.9% vs. 3.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [0.89-0.99]) and hospital readmission (4.8% vs. 4.9%; OR, 0.97 [0.94-1.01]) within 14 days. Once readmitted, however, children discharged directly home were more likely to be readmitted to a PICU (2.4% vs. 1.6%; OR, 1.58 [1.49-1.67]). Costs for the index hospitalization were lower for children discharged directly home compared with ward-transferred peers, leading to lower inpatient healthcare costs over 14 days (median, 15,023 [7,614.5-34,294.6] vs. 30,750 [14,558.3-68,830.6]; p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions: Discharge directly home from the PICU is common; children discharged directly home have comparable likelihood of return-to-ED or inpatient care as matched, ward-discharged peers. Discharge directly home for appropriate patients may provide increased efficiency for healthcare systems.

从PICU直接回家出院后返回护理:一项倾向匹配的队列研究。
目的:比较PICU患者出院后14天内返回急诊科(ED)或再次入院的比例,从PICU直接出院的患者和出院前转到急症监护室的患者;我们假设复诊率是相似的。设计:倾向匹配的多中心队列研究。环境:参与儿科健康信息系统的45家美国医院。患者:2016年至2023年入住非新生儿心脏或PICU的儿童。干预措施:没有。测量结果及主要结果:在560,815例PICU出院中,150,126例(26.8%)直接出院,但该比例因中心而异(9.8-55.6%)。我们将94,048名(62.6%)直接出院的儿童与153,887名转院儿童在入院年份、入院类型、主要诊断和估计直接出院可能性的倾向评分进行匹配。与转病房的同龄人相比,直接出院的儿童在14天内重返急诊科的比率相似(2.9%比3.0%;比值比[OR], 0.94[0.89-0.99]),再入院率(4.8%比4.9%;OR, 0.97[0.94-1.01])。然而,一旦再次入院,直接出院回家的儿童更有可能再次入住PICU (2.4% vs. 1.6%; OR, 1.58[1.49-1.67])。与转病房的同龄人相比,直接出院的儿童指数住院费用较低,导致14天住院医疗费用较低(中位数为15,023[7,614.5-34,294.6]对30,750 [14,558.3-68,830.6];p≤0.001)。结论:从PICU直接出院是常见的;直接出院的儿童返回急诊科或住院治疗的可能性与匹配的、出院的同龄人相当。适当的病人直接出院回家可以提高医疗保健系统的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信