A Case of Atlanto-Axial Rotatory Fixation Requiring Internal Fixation.

Ryunosuke Fukushi, Yujiro Takeshita, Tomonori Morita, Hiroki Fujita, Shunsuke Tachibana, Atsushi Teramoto
{"title":"A Case of Atlanto-Axial Rotatory Fixation Requiring Internal Fixation.","authors":"Ryunosuke Fukushi, Yujiro Takeshita, Tomonori Morita, Hiroki Fujita, Shunsuke Tachibana, Atsushi Teramoto","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.6082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most cases of atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (AARF) respond well to conservative treatment. Few reports have described initial management strategies. Almost no cases of AARF with recurrence requiring internal fixation have been reported. Here, we describe a case of recurrent AARF requiring internal fixation.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 5-year-old boy presented with a history of 22q.11.2 deletion syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, congenital left-sided clubfoot, and periodic vomiting. He was referred to a local pediatrician with neck pain and torticollis and was prescribed analgesics. After 5 days of no improvement, he was referred to a local pediatric orthopedic hospital where he was diagnosed with AARF (Fielding classification type III). The patient was then referred to our department for traction and orthotic therapy. Computed tomography revealed no deformity of the atlanto-axial articular surface and no evidence of bony fusion between the left and right posterior arches of the atlas. Following conservative treatment, the patient's neck pain and torticollis improved, and imaging confirmed the deformity had corrected. He was discharged on day 32. The symptoms recurred on day 42, and although traction and orthotic therapies were repeated, no improvement was observed. A halo vest was applied on day 59 after symptom onset. As the deformity was corrected, the halo vest was removed on day 94 and the patient continued to wear an orthosis. The patient recurrenced on day 104 and internal fixation was performed on day 120. Two 2.4-mm hollow screws were inserted using the Magerl method. No recurrence was observed at 213 days after onset, and bone union was confirmed by imaging test, and the brace was removed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Factors contributing to the intractability and recurrence of AARF include laxity and dysfunction of the transverse ligament. In this case, the latter was suspected because of the lax ligament structure. The patient did not undergo atlanto-axial fusion at age 5 years and vertebral bone hypoplasia was observed. Patients with a congenital element may not respond to standard conservative treatment. Thus, if the dislocation is left untreated, the lateral atlanto-axial joint may completely dislocate and drop, causing myelopathy. Thus, early internal fixation is considered desirable in such cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases of AARF involving congenital factors, patients may not respond to standard conservative treatment. Early internal fixation should therefore be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":"234-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.6082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most cases of atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (AARF) respond well to conservative treatment. Few reports have described initial management strategies. Almost no cases of AARF with recurrence requiring internal fixation have been reported. Here, we describe a case of recurrent AARF requiring internal fixation.

Case report: A 5-year-old boy presented with a history of 22q.11.2 deletion syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, congenital left-sided clubfoot, and periodic vomiting. He was referred to a local pediatrician with neck pain and torticollis and was prescribed analgesics. After 5 days of no improvement, he was referred to a local pediatric orthopedic hospital where he was diagnosed with AARF (Fielding classification type III). The patient was then referred to our department for traction and orthotic therapy. Computed tomography revealed no deformity of the atlanto-axial articular surface and no evidence of bony fusion between the left and right posterior arches of the atlas. Following conservative treatment, the patient's neck pain and torticollis improved, and imaging confirmed the deformity had corrected. He was discharged on day 32. The symptoms recurred on day 42, and although traction and orthotic therapies were repeated, no improvement was observed. A halo vest was applied on day 59 after symptom onset. As the deformity was corrected, the halo vest was removed on day 94 and the patient continued to wear an orthosis. The patient recurrenced on day 104 and internal fixation was performed on day 120. Two 2.4-mm hollow screws were inserted using the Magerl method. No recurrence was observed at 213 days after onset, and bone union was confirmed by imaging test, and the brace was removed.

Discussion: Factors contributing to the intractability and recurrence of AARF include laxity and dysfunction of the transverse ligament. In this case, the latter was suspected because of the lax ligament structure. The patient did not undergo atlanto-axial fusion at age 5 years and vertebral bone hypoplasia was observed. Patients with a congenital element may not respond to standard conservative treatment. Thus, if the dislocation is left untreated, the lateral atlanto-axial joint may completely dislocate and drop, causing myelopathy. Thus, early internal fixation is considered desirable in such cases.

Conclusion: In cases of AARF involving congenital factors, patients may not respond to standard conservative treatment. Early internal fixation should therefore be considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

寰枢旋转内固定需内固定1例。
大多数寰枢旋转固定(AARF)病例对保守治疗反应良好。很少有报告描述了最初的管理策略。几乎没有AARF复发需要内固定的病例报道。在这里,我们描述一个复发性AARF需要内固定的病例。病例报告:一名5岁男孩,表现为22q.11.2缺失综合征、DiGeorge综合征、先天性左内翻足和周期性呕吐史。由于颈部疼痛和斜颈,他被转介到当地的儿科医生那里,并开了止痛药。5天后没有好转,他被转到当地儿科骨科医院,在那里他被诊断为AARF (Fielding分类III型)。患者随后转到我科进行牵引和矫形治疗。计算机断层扫描显示寰枢关节面无畸形,寰椎左右后弓间无骨融合。保守治疗后,患者的颈部疼痛和斜颈得到改善,影像学证实畸形已经矫正。他在第32天出院。第42天症状复发,尽管反复进行牵引和矫形治疗,但未见改善。在症状出现后第59天应用晕罩背心。当畸形得到矫正时,在第94天移除光环背心,患者继续佩戴矫形器。患者于104天复发,120天内固定。采用Magerl法置入2枚2.4 mm空心螺钉。发病后213天无复发,影像学检查证实骨愈合,取出支具。讨论:导致AARF难治性和复发的因素包括横韧带的松弛和功能障碍。在本例中,由于韧带结构松弛,怀疑是后者。患者5岁时未行寰枢融合术,观察到椎体骨发育不全。有先天性因素的患者可能对标准的保守治疗没有反应。因此,如果脱位不及时治疗,外侧寰枢关节可能完全脱位并脱落,导致脊髓病。因此,在这种情况下,早期内固定是可取的。结论:在涉及先天性因素的AARF病例中,患者可能对标准保守治疗无效。因此应考虑早期内固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信