VA Clinicians' Perspectives on Low-Value Health Service Use in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zachary A Cupler, Kristina L Hruska, Nicole M Beyer, Loren J Schleiden, Keri L Rodriguez, Liam Rose, Aimee N Pickering, Carolyn T Thorpe, Thomas R Radomski
{"title":"VA Clinicians' Perspectives on Low-Value Health Service Use in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Zachary A Cupler, Kristina L Hruska, Nicole M Beyer, Loren J Schleiden, Keri L Rodriguez, Liam Rose, Aimee N Pickering, Carolyn T Thorpe, Thomas R Radomski","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09838-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-value health services adversely affect outcomes and unnecessarily increase the cost of care. Approximately 10% of Veterans receive at least one of 29 low-value services delivered or paid for by the Veterans Health Administration (VA) annually. However, determinants of and potential solutions to reduce low-value service delivery are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the drivers of and approaches to reduce low-value service delivery across VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) from the perspective of VA clinicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews conducted from October 2022 to November 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>65 VA clinicians, including 32 generalists and 33 medical and surgical specialists, at 46 VAMCs.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We used deductive analysis based on a priori categories and definitions structured by the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify predominant themes related to drivers of low-value service delivery. We used inductive analysis to identify clinician-suggested approaches to reduce low-value services.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified three overarching domains as drivers of low-value service delivery at VA: 1) environmental context and resources; 2) social influence; and 3) belief about consequences. Regarding key subthemes, social pressure from Veterans emerged among generalists and specialists. Generalists were more likely to identify referral parameters or requirements compared to specialists, while specialists were more like to identify negative consequences compared to generalists. We identified four overarching domains as approaches to reduce low-value service delivery at VA, which were consistently identified by both generalists and specialists: 1) improving quality and access to VA health care; 2) dissemination of best practices; 3) optimizing use of the electronic health record; and 4) instilling an organizational culture on value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified the most salient drivers of and approaches to reduce low-value services from the perspective of VA clinicians. These findings may inform the design of future de-implementation interventions and policy to reduce VA-delivered low-value services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09838-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-value health services adversely affect outcomes and unnecessarily increase the cost of care. Approximately 10% of Veterans receive at least one of 29 low-value services delivered or paid for by the Veterans Health Administration (VA) annually. However, determinants of and potential solutions to reduce low-value service delivery are poorly understood.

Objective: To characterize the drivers of and approaches to reduce low-value service delivery across VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) from the perspective of VA clinicians.

Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews conducted from October 2022 to November 2023.

Participants: 65 VA clinicians, including 32 generalists and 33 medical and surgical specialists, at 46 VAMCs.

Approach: We used deductive analysis based on a priori categories and definitions structured by the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify predominant themes related to drivers of low-value service delivery. We used inductive analysis to identify clinician-suggested approaches to reduce low-value services.

Key results: We identified three overarching domains as drivers of low-value service delivery at VA: 1) environmental context and resources; 2) social influence; and 3) belief about consequences. Regarding key subthemes, social pressure from Veterans emerged among generalists and specialists. Generalists were more likely to identify referral parameters or requirements compared to specialists, while specialists were more like to identify negative consequences compared to generalists. We identified four overarching domains as approaches to reduce low-value service delivery at VA, which were consistently identified by both generalists and specialists: 1) improving quality and access to VA health care; 2) dissemination of best practices; 3) optimizing use of the electronic health record; and 4) instilling an organizational culture on value.

Conclusions: We identified the most salient drivers of and approaches to reduce low-value services from the perspective of VA clinicians. These findings may inform the design of future de-implementation interventions and policy to reduce VA-delivered low-value services.

退伍军人健康管理局临床医生对低价值医疗服务使用的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:低价值的卫生服务对结果产生不利影响,并不必要地增加保健费用。大约10%的退伍军人每年至少接受由退伍军人健康管理局(VA)提供或支付的29项低价值服务中的一项。然而,人们对减少低价值服务提供的决定因素和潜在解决方案知之甚少。目的:从退伍军人医疗中心临床医生的角度描述退伍军人医疗中心(VAMCs)减少低价值服务提供的驱动因素和方法。设计:从2022年10月到2023年11月,使用半结构化访谈进行定性研究。参与者:46个VAMCs的65名VA临床医生,包括32名全科医生和33名内科和外科专家。方法:我们使用基于先验类别和理论领域框架结构定义的演绎分析,以确定与低价值服务交付驱动因素相关的主要主题。我们使用归纳分析来确定临床医生建议的减少低价值服务的方法。主要结果:我们确定了三个主要领域作为VA低价值服务交付的驱动因素:1)环境背景和资源;2)社会影响;3)对结果的信念。在关键的次要主题上,来自退伍军人的社会压力出现在通才和专家之间。通才比专才更倾向于识别转诊参数或要求,而专才比通才更倾向于识别负面后果。我们确定了四个总体领域作为减少VA低价值服务提供的方法,这些方法得到了通才和专家的一致认可:1)提高VA医疗保健的质量和可及性;2)传播最佳做法;3)优化电子病历的使用;4)灌输价值观的组织文化。结论:我们从VA临床医生的角度确定了减少低价值服务的最显著驱动因素和方法。这些发现可以为未来的反实施干预措施和政策的设计提供信息,以减少va提供的低价值服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信