Management of bile acid diarrhea in Italy: a survey.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Giovanni Marasco, Giovanni Barbara, Massimo Bellini, Piero Portincasa, Vincenzo Stanghellini, Bruno Annibale, Antonio Benedetti, Giovanni Cammarota, Walter Fries, Paolo Usai Satta, Enrico Stefano Corazziari
{"title":"Management of bile acid diarrhea in Italy: a survey.","authors":"Giovanni Marasco, Giovanni Barbara, Massimo Bellini, Piero Portincasa, Vincenzo Stanghellini, Bruno Annibale, Antonio Benedetti, Giovanni Cammarota, Walter Fries, Paolo Usai Satta, Enrico Stefano Corazziari","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04060-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is a common, under-investigated cause of chronic diarrhea. We aimed to assess the current management of BAD among a group of Italian physicians. A survey was developed by a task force of experts and distributed via the Internet to Italian physicians members of the main Italian gastroenterological associations. Ninety-four physicians accepted to participate, of whom 44% were females. The majority of participants were gastroenterologists (63%) and the mean age was 50.5 years. No differences in the rate of BAD diagnosis among patients with chronic diarrhea were found according to medical specialization. Gastroenterologists reported a higher prevalence of BAD compared with other physicians/general practitioners (1% vs 0.3%). BAD suspicion is mostly raised in the presence of watery stools and > 3 bowel movements/day and the exclusion of organic/drug-related diseases. BAD diagnosis was assessed with 75SeHCAT (67.8% of gastroenterologists and 51.4% of other physicians), followed by a trial of cholestyramine (30.5% of gastroenterologists and 31.4% of other physicians). Therapies most prescribed for BAD were cholestyramine, a low-fat diet, and stool thickeners. BAD is a common condition generally suspected in the presence of chronic watery diarrhea. 75SeHCAT availability influences the awareness of this disease. Therapies currently are often not able to guarantee adequate symptom relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04060-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is a common, under-investigated cause of chronic diarrhea. We aimed to assess the current management of BAD among a group of Italian physicians. A survey was developed by a task force of experts and distributed via the Internet to Italian physicians members of the main Italian gastroenterological associations. Ninety-four physicians accepted to participate, of whom 44% were females. The majority of participants were gastroenterologists (63%) and the mean age was 50.5 years. No differences in the rate of BAD diagnosis among patients with chronic diarrhea were found according to medical specialization. Gastroenterologists reported a higher prevalence of BAD compared with other physicians/general practitioners (1% vs 0.3%). BAD suspicion is mostly raised in the presence of watery stools and > 3 bowel movements/day and the exclusion of organic/drug-related diseases. BAD diagnosis was assessed with 75SeHCAT (67.8% of gastroenterologists and 51.4% of other physicians), followed by a trial of cholestyramine (30.5% of gastroenterologists and 31.4% of other physicians). Therapies most prescribed for BAD were cholestyramine, a low-fat diet, and stool thickeners. BAD is a common condition generally suspected in the presence of chronic watery diarrhea. 75SeHCAT availability influences the awareness of this disease. Therapies currently are often not able to guarantee adequate symptom relief.

意大利胆汁酸性腹泻的管理:一项调查。
胆汁酸性腹泻(BAD)是一种常见的慢性腹泻,但尚未得到充分研究。我们的目的是评估一组意大利医生目前对BAD的管理。专家工作组开展了一项调查,并通过互联网分发给意大利主要胃肠病学协会的意大利医生成员。94名医生接受参与,其中44%为女性。大多数参与者是胃肠病学家(63%),平均年龄为50.5岁。不同医学专业的慢性腹泻患者BAD诊断率差异无统计学意义。与其他内科医生/全科医生相比,胃肠病学家报告的BAD患病率更高(1%比0.3%)。BAD的怀疑主要是在出现水样便和每天排便30次,排除器质性/药物相关疾病的情况下提出的。采用75SeHCAT(67.8%的胃肠病学家和51.4%的其他医生)对BAD诊断进行评估,随后进行胆甾胺试验(30.5%的胃肠病学家和31.4%的其他医生)。治疗BAD最常用的方法是胆甾胺、低脂饮食和大便增稠剂。BAD是一种常见病,通常被怀疑存在慢性水样腹泻。75 . sehcat的可获得性影响人们对这种疾病的认识。目前的治疗方法往往不能保证充分缓解症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信