Physician variation in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of postpartum and interval sterilization for ovarian cancer risk reduction

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Katherine Yoh , Vrunda B. Desai , Cary P. Gross , Erica S. Spatz , Craig Evan Pollack , Jason D. Wright , Xiao Xu
{"title":"Physician variation in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of postpartum and interval sterilization for ovarian cancer risk reduction","authors":"Katherine Yoh ,&nbsp;Vrunda B. Desai ,&nbsp;Cary P. Gross ,&nbsp;Erica S. Spatz ,&nbsp;Craig Evan Pollack ,&nbsp;Jason D. Wright ,&nbsp;Xiao Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine variation in physician adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for patients undergoing tubal sterilization.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we identified patients age 18–49 undergoing postpartum or interval sterilization between January 2011–June 2022. Risk-adjusted rate of OS was estimated for each physician-year. Subsequently, we used group-based trajectory models to identify latent groups of physicians following distinct patterns of uptake and examined factors associated with the distinct trajectory patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 383,338 <em>postpartum sterilizations</em> (7550 physicians), OS increased from 0.1 % in 2011 to 14.3 % in 2022. Two physician adoption trajectories emerged: low (81.9 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.049 % in 2011 and 6.1 % in 2022) and high (18.1 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.02 % in 2011 and 55.3 % in 2022) adoption. Likewise, among 136,965 <em>interval sterilizations</em> (3401 physicians), OS rose from 1.4 % in 2011 to 65.9 % in 2022 with nearly equal number of physicians in the low (50.1 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 25.7 % in 2022) and high (49.9 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 95.8 % in 2022) adoption groups. Physicians with these distinct trajectories differed significantly in rural/urban location, geographic region, surgical volume, and patient composition. In particular, a 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of Black patients was associated with lower odds of high adoption for both postpartum (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.82–0.96) and interval (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.84–0.94) sterilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While OS increased over time, a substantial proportion of physicians remained low adopters. Geographic and demographic differences in adoption suggest potential inequitable access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825009916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine variation in physician adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for patients undergoing tubal sterilization.

Study design

Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we identified patients age 18–49 undergoing postpartum or interval sterilization between January 2011–June 2022. Risk-adjusted rate of OS was estimated for each physician-year. Subsequently, we used group-based trajectory models to identify latent groups of physicians following distinct patterns of uptake and examined factors associated with the distinct trajectory patterns.

Results

Among 383,338 postpartum sterilizations (7550 physicians), OS increased from 0.1 % in 2011 to 14.3 % in 2022. Two physician adoption trajectories emerged: low (81.9 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.049 % in 2011 and 6.1 % in 2022) and high (18.1 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.02 % in 2011 and 55.3 % in 2022) adoption. Likewise, among 136,965 interval sterilizations (3401 physicians), OS rose from 1.4 % in 2011 to 65.9 % in 2022 with nearly equal number of physicians in the low (50.1 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 25.7 % in 2022) and high (49.9 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 95.8 % in 2022) adoption groups. Physicians with these distinct trajectories differed significantly in rural/urban location, geographic region, surgical volume, and patient composition. In particular, a 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of Black patients was associated with lower odds of high adoption for both postpartum (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.82–0.96) and interval (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.84–0.94) sterilization.

Conclusions

While OS increased over time, a substantial proportion of physicians remained low adopters. Geographic and demographic differences in adoption suggest potential inequitable access.
医生在产后时机性输卵管切除术和间歇绝育以降低卵巢癌风险的差异。
目的:探讨医生在输卵管绝育患者中选择机会性输卵管切除术(OS)的差异。研究设计:使用Premier Healthcare数据库,我们确定了2011年1月至2022年6月期间年龄在18-49岁之间进行产后或间歇绝育的患者。评估每个医师年的OS风险调整率。随后,我们使用基于群体的轨迹模型来识别具有不同摄取模式的潜在医生群体,并检查与不同轨迹模式相关的因素。结果:产后绝育手术383338例(7550名医师)中,手术成功率从2011年的0.1%上升到2022年的14.3%。出现了两种医生采用率轨迹:低采用率(81.9%的医生,2011年的OS率为0.049%,2022年为6.1%)和高采用率(18.1%的医生,2011年的OS率为0.02%,2022年为55.3%)。同样,在136,965例间隔绝育手术(3401名医生)中,手术成功率从2011年的1.4%上升到2022年的65.9%,其中低(50.1%,手术成功率2011年为0.6%,2022年为25.7%)和高(49.9%,手术成功率2011年为0.6%,2022年为95.8%)接受组的医生人数几乎相同。具有这些不同轨迹的医生在农村/城市位置、地理区域、手术量和患者组成方面存在显著差异。特别是,黑人患者比例增加10个百分点与产后(aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96)和间隔(aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94)绝育的高采用率降低相关。结论:虽然OS随着时间的推移而增加,但相当大比例的医生仍然是低采用者。在收养方面的地理和人口差异表明可能存在不公平的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信