Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan and Amlodipine Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan and Amlodipine Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Yu-Ying Xu, Wen-Tan Xu, Wei-Ping Pan, Xie-Li Guo, Xiao-Min Li, Su-Mei Xu, Shao-Wei Yan, Wen-Ke Cai, Xin-Bin Yan, Wen-Jing Zhong, Shi-Lin Chen, Ping-Sheng Xu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (C<sub>max</sub>) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CVW ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CVW < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (Cmax) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.