Matthias W Wichmann, Timothy K McCullough, Tom Gunning, Guy J Maddern
{"title":"Dual Surgeon Operating to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Surgery Skill Fatigue in Rural Surgery-A Prospective Audit of 154 Patients.","authors":"Matthias W Wichmann, Timothy K McCullough, Tom Gunning, Guy J Maddern","doi":"10.1111/ans.70272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skill maintenance for rural surgeons is challenging. Surgery for colorectal disease requires a specialised skill set. Dual surgeon operating in low or medium volume centres may mitigate skill fade and improve surgical outcomes. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of dual surgeon operating.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective audit of outcomes after dual surgeon operations for colorectal disease in a non-metropolitan surgical centre. Results are compared with treatment outcomes in the same hospital prior to the dual surgeon approach. Ethics approval CALHN Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref # 12041).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-four patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer during the audit period (November 2015 to February 2025). 60% of the patients were male (N = 92); median age was 70 years. Compared to the historic control (N = 233) there was a significant reduction in wound infections (3.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.0038), complications (24% vs. 40%, p = 0.02), intraoperative blood loss (60 vs. 250 mL, p < 0.001) and length of stay (6 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The lymph node yield was significantly increased (17 vs. 13, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (87% vs. 23.6%, intention to treat, p < 0.00001) with a reduction of conversions (6% vs. 11%, p = 0.28). Outcomes were improved but did not reach statistical significance with regard to 30-day mortality (0.64% vs. 0.86%, p = 0.82), leak rate (2.2% vs. 5.5% of procedures with anastomosis, p = 0.15) and unplanned return to theatre (4.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings confirm that two-surgeon operating is feasible and safe for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Significantly better postoperative outcomes can be achieved with regard to complications, blood loss, and length of stay. The approach allows for more than 85% of all procedures to be done minimally invasive. Dual-surgeon operating helps to mitigate skill fade as well as loss of confidence for surgeons performing complex colorectal procedures in a low/medium volume setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Skill maintenance for rural surgeons is challenging. Surgery for colorectal disease requires a specialised skill set. Dual surgeon operating in low or medium volume centres may mitigate skill fade and improve surgical outcomes. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of dual surgeon operating.
Methods: Prospective audit of outcomes after dual surgeon operations for colorectal disease in a non-metropolitan surgical centre. Results are compared with treatment outcomes in the same hospital prior to the dual surgeon approach. Ethics approval CALHN Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref # 12041).
Results: One hundred fifty-four patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer during the audit period (November 2015 to February 2025). 60% of the patients were male (N = 92); median age was 70 years. Compared to the historic control (N = 233) there was a significant reduction in wound infections (3.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.0038), complications (24% vs. 40%, p = 0.02), intraoperative blood loss (60 vs. 250 mL, p < 0.001) and length of stay (6 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The lymph node yield was significantly increased (17 vs. 13, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (87% vs. 23.6%, intention to treat, p < 0.00001) with a reduction of conversions (6% vs. 11%, p = 0.28). Outcomes were improved but did not reach statistical significance with regard to 30-day mortality (0.64% vs. 0.86%, p = 0.82), leak rate (2.2% vs. 5.5% of procedures with anastomosis, p = 0.15) and unplanned return to theatre (4.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.24).
Conclusions: Our findings confirm that two-surgeon operating is feasible and safe for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Significantly better postoperative outcomes can be achieved with regard to complications, blood loss, and length of stay. The approach allows for more than 85% of all procedures to be done minimally invasive. Dual-surgeon operating helps to mitigate skill fade as well as loss of confidence for surgeons performing complex colorectal procedures in a low/medium volume setting.
背景:农村外科医生的技能维护具有挑战性。结直肠疾病的手术需要一套专门的技能。双外科手术在小或中容积中心可以减轻技能衰退和改善手术结果。关于双外科医生手术的结果的数据缺乏。方法:前瞻性审计双外科手术后的结果在非都市外科中心结直肠疾病。结果与双外科入路前同一医院的治疗结果进行比较。伦理批准CALHN人类研究伦理委员会(Ref # 12041)。结果:审计期间(2015年11月至2025年2月)共154例结直肠癌手术。男性占60% (N = 92);中位年龄为70岁。与历史对照组(N = 233)相比,伤口感染(3.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.0038),并发症(24% vs. 40%, p = 0.02),术中出血量(60 vs. 250 mL, p)显著减少。结论:我们的研究结果证实双外科手术治疗结直肠癌是可行和安全的。在并发症、失血和住院时间方面,可以获得明显更好的术后结果。该方法允许85%以上的手术以微创方式完成。双外科医生操作有助于减轻在中/低体积环境下进行复杂结直肠手术的外科医生的技能衰退和信心丧失。
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.