Efficacy and Safety of the Minimal-Scarring Subdermal Adipo-Glandular Rotation Flap for Volume Displacement in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Preliminary Comparative Study.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of the Minimal-Scarring Subdermal Adipo-Glandular Rotation Flap for Volume Displacement in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Preliminary Comparative Study.","authors":"Erika Iguchi, Tomohiro Miyake, Naoki Inafuku, Sakiko Kumata, Haruka Fujimoto, Sae Kitano, Chikage Kato, Midori Morita, Koichi Sakaguchi, Yasuto Naoi","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dermoglandular rotation flap with Burow's triangle is a widely used volume displacement technique in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer, particularly in cases with poor cosmetic prognoses. However, this method often results in extensive scarring. To address this limitation, we developed the subdermal adipo-glandular rotation flap (AGRF), designed to minimize surgical scars while preserving aesthetic outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of AGRF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2022 and September 2023, 22 patients with breast cancer who underwent BCS with rotation flap reconstruction and sentinel lymph node biopsy were analyzed. Among them, 9 patients received AGRF (AGRF group), while 13 underwent the conventional dermoglandular rotation flap (control group). Surgical outcomes and complications were retrospectively compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AGRF group exhibited a significantly shorter median wound length compared to the control group (8.5 cm vs 18 cm, P < 0.001). Cosmetic outcomes were comparable between groups, with similar proportions of patients rated as excellent or good (AGRF vs control: Harvard scale, 100% vs 92%, P = 1.000; BCCT.core, 89% vs 85%, P = 1.000). No significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, or fat necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AGRF effectively reduces surgical scar length without compromising cosmetic outcomes or requiring complex techniques. This makes it a valuable option for volume displacement after BCS, particularly in patients with nonfatty breasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"95 4","pages":"356-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The dermoglandular rotation flap with Burow's triangle is a widely used volume displacement technique in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer, particularly in cases with poor cosmetic prognoses. However, this method often results in extensive scarring. To address this limitation, we developed the subdermal adipo-glandular rotation flap (AGRF), designed to minimize surgical scars while preserving aesthetic outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of AGRF.
Methods: Between March 2022 and September 2023, 22 patients with breast cancer who underwent BCS with rotation flap reconstruction and sentinel lymph node biopsy were analyzed. Among them, 9 patients received AGRF (AGRF group), while 13 underwent the conventional dermoglandular rotation flap (control group). Surgical outcomes and complications were retrospectively compared.
Results: The AGRF group exhibited a significantly shorter median wound length compared to the control group (8.5 cm vs 18 cm, P < 0.001). Cosmetic outcomes were comparable between groups, with similar proportions of patients rated as excellent or good (AGRF vs control: Harvard scale, 100% vs 92%, P = 1.000; BCCT.core, 89% vs 85%, P = 1.000). No significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, or fat necrosis.
Conclusions: AGRF effectively reduces surgical scar length without compromising cosmetic outcomes or requiring complex techniques. This makes it a valuable option for volume displacement after BCS, particularly in patients with nonfatty breasts.
目的:皮腺旋转布洛三角瓣是一种广泛应用于乳腺癌保乳手术(BCS)的容积置换技术,特别是在美容预后较差的病例中。然而,这种方法通常会导致大面积的疤痕。为了解决这一局限性,我们开发了真皮下脂肪腺体旋转皮瓣(AGRF),旨在最大限度地减少手术疤痕,同时保持美观的效果。本研究评价AGRF的疗效和安全性。方法:对2022年3月至2023年9月22例行BCS联合旋转皮瓣重建和前哨淋巴结活检的乳腺癌患者进行分析。其中,9例患者行AGRF (AGRF组),13例患者行常规皮腺旋转皮瓣(对照组)。回顾性比较手术结果和并发症。结果:与对照组相比,AGRF组的中位创面长度显著缩短(8.5 cm vs 18 cm, P < 0.001)。各组之间的美容结果具有可比性,被评为优秀或良好的患者比例相似(AGRF vs对照组:哈佛量表,100% vs 92%, P = 1.000; BCCT)。核心,89% vs 85%, P = 1.000)。两组在手术时间、出血量、术后疼痛和脂肪坏死方面均无显著差异。结论:AGRF在不影响美容效果或不需要复杂技术的情况下有效地缩短了手术疤痕长度。这使得它成为BCS后体积移位的一个有价值的选择,特别是对于非脂肪性乳房的患者。
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.