Effects of artificial liver support systems on nosocomial infections and mortality in non-transplanted liver failure patients.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yuan Li, Xiaoting Wang, Junkai Fan, Jiale Xie, Huimin Liu, Chunrong Ping, Zhijie Feng, Yan Wang
{"title":"Effects of artificial liver support systems on nosocomial infections and mortality in non-transplanted liver failure patients.","authors":"Yuan Li, Xiaoting Wang, Junkai Fan, Jiale Xie, Huimin Liu, Chunrong Ping, Zhijie Feng, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Artificial liver support systems (ALSS) offer a technical solution for patients with liver failure (LF), serving as a bridge to recovery or transplantation. However, the number of LF patients eligible for transplants is limited. This study investigates the incidence of nosocomial infections and survival outcomes in LF patients treated with ALSS who do not undergo liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on LF patients receiving standard medical care (SMC) with ALSS versus those treated only with SMC. General and laboratory data were collected from all LF patients. A logistic regression model was used to assesse the risk of nosocomial infections associated with ALSS use, while Cox proportional hazards models was used to evaluate mortality risk in LF patients undergoing ALSS treatment. Survival times for both groups were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 306 LF patients were analyzed, comprising 200 males (65.4%) and 106 females (34.6%), with an average age of 49.9 years (95% CI = 48.2-51.6). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ALSS was not linked to the risk of nosocomial infections (odds ratio =1.189, 95%CI=0.442-3.202, p=0.732). However, hazard ratio (HR) results indicated that ALSS is a protective factor for survival in LF patients (HR=0.533, 95%CI=0.374-0.760, p=0.001), supported by Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrating prolonged survival time in the ALSS group among LF patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ALSS is not an independent risk factor for nosocomial infections and could effectively prolong the lifespan of LF patients without liver transplantation. Further intervention studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"102113"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Artificial liver support systems (ALSS) offer a technical solution for patients with liver failure (LF), serving as a bridge to recovery or transplantation. However, the number of LF patients eligible for transplants is limited. This study investigates the incidence of nosocomial infections and survival outcomes in LF patients treated with ALSS who do not undergo liver transplantation.

Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on LF patients receiving standard medical care (SMC) with ALSS versus those treated only with SMC. General and laboratory data were collected from all LF patients. A logistic regression model was used to assesse the risk of nosocomial infections associated with ALSS use, while Cox proportional hazards models was used to evaluate mortality risk in LF patients undergoing ALSS treatment. Survival times for both groups were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: A total of 306 LF patients were analyzed, comprising 200 males (65.4%) and 106 females (34.6%), with an average age of 49.9 years (95% CI = 48.2-51.6). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ALSS was not linked to the risk of nosocomial infections (odds ratio =1.189, 95%CI=0.442-3.202, p=0.732). However, hazard ratio (HR) results indicated that ALSS is a protective factor for survival in LF patients (HR=0.533, 95%CI=0.374-0.760, p=0.001), supported by Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrating prolonged survival time in the ALSS group among LF patients.

Conclusions: ALSS is not an independent risk factor for nosocomial infections and could effectively prolong the lifespan of LF patients without liver transplantation. Further intervention studies are needed to validate these findings.

人工肝支持系统对非移植性肝衰竭患者院内感染和死亡率的影响。
简介和目的:人工肝支持系统(ALSS)为肝功能衰竭(LF)患者提供了一种技术解决方案,可作为恢复或移植的桥梁。然而,适合移植的LF患者数量有限。本研究调查了不接受肝移植的接受ALSS治疗的LF患者的医院感染发生率和生存结局。患者和方法:对接受标准医疗护理(SMC)联合ALSS治疗的LF患者与仅接受SMC治疗的LF患者进行了回顾性队列研究。收集所有LF患者的一般和实验室数据。采用logistic回归模型评估与ALSS使用相关的医院感染风险,采用Cox比例风险模型评估接受ALSS治疗的LF患者的死亡风险。采用Kaplan-Meier分析计算两组患者的生存时间。结果:共分析LF患者306例,其中男性200例(65.4%),女性106例(34.6%),平均年龄49.9岁(95% CI = 48.2-51.6)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,ALSS与院内感染风险无关(优势比=1.189,95%CI=0.442 ~ 3.202, p=0.732)。然而,风险比(HR)结果显示,ALSS是LF患者生存的保护因素(HR=0.533, 95%CI=0.374-0.760, p=0.001), Kaplan-Meier曲线分析支持ALSS组在LF患者中延长生存时间。结论:ALSS不是院内感染的独立危险因素,可有效延长非肝移植的LF患者的生存期。需要进一步的干预研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信