Effects of estetrol/drospirenone versus ethinyl estradiol/drospirenone on glucose tolerance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Phattarika Bunyapipat, Satit Klangsin, Krantarat Peeyananjarassri, Saranya Wattanakumtornkul, Sirapat Katesuwan, Alan Geater, Amornkan Numit
{"title":"Effects of estetrol/drospirenone versus ethinyl estradiol/drospirenone on glucose tolerance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Phattarika Bunyapipat, Satit Klangsin, Krantarat Peeyananjarassri, Saranya Wattanakumtornkul, Sirapat Katesuwan, Alan Geater, Amornkan Numit","doi":"10.1111/dom.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effects of estetrol/drospirenone (E4/DRSP) and ethinyl estradiol/drospirenone (EE/DRSP) on glucose tolerance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This open-label, randomised crossover trial was conducted from January 2024 to January 2025. Women with PCOS, diagnosed according to the modified 2003 Rotterdam criteria, received three cycles of either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg or EE 30 mcg/DRSP 3 mg. After a 2-month washout, participants crossed over to the alternate regimen for three further cycles. Glucose tolerance (via 75 g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]), insulin levels and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were compared between treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 66 women enrolled, 61 completed both treatment phases. Baseline characteristics were comparable. No significant differences were observed in the mean changes in 2-h OGTT (E4/DRSP: 4.65 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.37 to 11.66] vs. EE/DRSP: 14.40 mg/dL [95% CI 7.50-21.29]; p = 0.05; upper boundary for non-inferiority margin of 14.29), 1-h insulin levels (-1.04 μU/mL [95% CI -25.94 to 23.86] vs. -0.77 μU/mL [95% CI -25.24 to 23.70]; p = 0.99; upper boundary for non-inferiority margin of 50.72) or HOMA-IR (0.28 [95% CI -0.24 to 0.80] vs. 0.60 [95% CI 0.09-1.11]; p = 0.39; upper boundary for non-inferiority margin of 1.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>E4/DRSP was not inferior to EE/DRSP in its effects on glucose tolerance, insulin levels and HOMA-IR, supporting its use as a potential oral contraceptive option in women with PCOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To compare the effects of estetrol/drospirenone (E4/DRSP) and ethinyl estradiol/drospirenone (EE/DRSP) on glucose tolerance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Materials and methods: This open-label, randomised crossover trial was conducted from January 2024 to January 2025. Women with PCOS, diagnosed according to the modified 2003 Rotterdam criteria, received three cycles of either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg or EE 30 mcg/DRSP 3 mg. After a 2-month washout, participants crossed over to the alternate regimen for three further cycles. Glucose tolerance (via 75 g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]), insulin levels and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were compared between treatments.

Results: Of 66 women enrolled, 61 completed both treatment phases. Baseline characteristics were comparable. No significant differences were observed in the mean changes in 2-h OGTT (E4/DRSP: 4.65 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.37 to 11.66] vs. EE/DRSP: 14.40 mg/dL [95% CI 7.50-21.29]; p = 0.05; upper boundary for non-inferiority margin of 14.29), 1-h insulin levels (-1.04 μU/mL [95% CI -25.94 to 23.86] vs. -0.77 μU/mL [95% CI -25.24 to 23.70]; p = 0.99; upper boundary for non-inferiority margin of 50.72) or HOMA-IR (0.28 [95% CI -0.24 to 0.80] vs. 0.60 [95% CI 0.09-1.11]; p = 0.39; upper boundary for non-inferiority margin of 1.06).

Conclusion: E4/DRSP was not inferior to EE/DRSP in its effects on glucose tolerance, insulin levels and HOMA-IR, supporting its use as a potential oral contraceptive option in women with PCOS.

雌二醇/屈螺酮对多囊卵巢综合征女性糖耐量的影响:一项随机对照试验
目的:比较雌二醇/屈螺酮(E4/DRSP)和乙炔雌二醇/屈螺酮(EE/DRSP)对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性糖耐量的影响。材料和方法:这项开放标签、随机交叉试验于2024年1月至2025年1月进行。根据2003年修订的鹿特丹标准诊断为多囊卵巢综合征的妇女接受了三个周期的E4 15毫克/DRSP 3毫克或EE 30微克/DRSP 3毫克。在2个月的洗脱期后,参与者进入另外三个周期的替代方案。葡萄糖耐量(通过75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验[OGTT])、胰岛素水平和胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)进行比较。结果:66名入组妇女中,61名完成了两个治疗阶段。基线特征具有可比性。2 h OGTT的平均变化无显著差异(E4/DRSP: 4.65 mg/dL[95%可信区间(CI) -2.37至11.66]与EE/DRSP: 14.40 mg/dL[95%可信区间(CI) 7.50-21.29];p = 0.05;1 h胰岛素水平(-1.04 μU/mL [95% CI -25.94 ~ 23.86] vs. -0.77 μU/mL [95% CI -25.24 ~ 23.70]; p = 0.99;非劣效边际上限为50.72)或HOMA-IR (0.28 [95% CI -0.24 ~ 0.80] vs. 0.60 [95% CI 0.09 ~ 1.11]; p = 0.39;非劣效边际上限为1.06)。结论:E4/DRSP对糖耐量、胰岛素水平和HOMA-IR的影响不逊于EE/DRSP,支持其作为PCOS女性口服避孕药的潜在选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信