How the political elite make decisions

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Conor Wynn, Liam Smith, Catherine Killen
{"title":"How the political elite make decisions","authors":"Conor Wynn,&nbsp;Liam Smith,&nbsp;Catherine Killen","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The political elite make policy decisions in noisy environments and under time pressure, and so are prone to using heuristics. There are conflicting schools of thought as to whether it is appropriate for them to do so. Experienced decision-makers are thought to be more effective at using heuristics, so it is possible that for the political elite with experience in a particular context, heuristic decision-making is appropriate. Yet, many politicians are asked to make decisions on matters about which they are not experts. To add to the debate, we facilitated a discussion with a highly experienced cohort of 21 current and former senior politicians, former advisers, and current and former senior bureaucrats. When presented with a carefully considered and innovative new transport network pricing policy, we sought to identify whether and, if so, how they used heuristics to make a decision. We found that they used heuristics (1) to decide whether to engage with the issue at all and (2) how to act, having made the decision to engage. We describe how these heuristics were used and discuss the implications for theory and public administration practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>There is a growing body of evidence that the political elite use heuristics for decision-making and that the use of heuristics is influenced by seven factors.</li>\n \n <li>We gained rare access to the political elite deciding on a politically risky issue and observed not only which heuristics they used, but how they used them.</li>\n \n <li>We observed a three-step decision tree, incorporating the ‘wait-and-see’ heuristic being used to decide whether to act, and political empathy, or intuiting voter heuristics to help decide how to act.</li>\n \n <li>We outline five options for public administrators who think that the political elite are using heuristics inappropriately for decision-making.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"84 3","pages":"520-538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12664","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The political elite make policy decisions in noisy environments and under time pressure, and so are prone to using heuristics. There are conflicting schools of thought as to whether it is appropriate for them to do so. Experienced decision-makers are thought to be more effective at using heuristics, so it is possible that for the political elite with experience in a particular context, heuristic decision-making is appropriate. Yet, many politicians are asked to make decisions on matters about which they are not experts. To add to the debate, we facilitated a discussion with a highly experienced cohort of 21 current and former senior politicians, former advisers, and current and former senior bureaucrats. When presented with a carefully considered and innovative new transport network pricing policy, we sought to identify whether and, if so, how they used heuristics to make a decision. We found that they used heuristics (1) to decide whether to engage with the issue at all and (2) how to act, having made the decision to engage. We describe how these heuristics were used and discuss the implications for theory and public administration practice.

Points for practitioners

  • There is a growing body of evidence that the political elite use heuristics for decision-making and that the use of heuristics is influenced by seven factors.
  • We gained rare access to the political elite deciding on a politically risky issue and observed not only which heuristics they used, but how they used them.
  • We observed a three-step decision tree, incorporating the ‘wait-and-see’ heuristic being used to decide whether to act, and political empathy, or intuiting voter heuristics to help decide how to act.
  • We outline five options for public administrators who think that the political elite are using heuristics inappropriately for decision-making.

Abstract Image

政治精英是如何做决定的
政治精英在嘈杂的环境和时间压力下做出政策决定,因此倾向于使用启发式。对于他们这样做是否合适,存在着相互冲突的思想流派。经验丰富的决策者被认为在使用启发式方面更有效,因此对于具有特定背景经验的政治精英来说,启发式决策可能是合适的。然而,许多政治家被要求在他们不是专家的问题上做出决定。为了增加辩论,我们促成了一场由21位现任和前任高级政治家、前任顾问、现任和前任高级官僚组成的经验丰富的讨论。当提出一个经过仔细考虑和创新的新运输网络定价政策时,我们试图确定他们是否以及如果是,他们如何使用启发式来做出决定。我们发现他们使用启发式(1)来决定是否参与这个问题,(2)在做出参与的决定后如何行动。我们描述了这些启发式是如何使用的,并讨论了理论和公共行政实践的含义。越来越多的证据表明,政治精英使用启发式进行决策,启发式的使用受到七个因素的影响。我们难得地接触到了政治精英们对一个政治风险问题的决策,不仅观察到他们使用了哪些启发式方法,还观察到他们是如何使用这些方法的。我们观察了一个三步决策树,其中包括用于决定是否采取行动的“观望”启发式,以及用于决定如何采取行动的政治同理心或直觉选民启发式。我们为那些认为政治精英不恰当地使用启发式进行决策的公共行政人员概述了五种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信