Ureteral stent symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of mirabegron and tamsulosin

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1002/bco2.485
Daniel Madarshahian, Abdulrasheed Habeeb, Nimeshan Chandra-Segaran, Kesavapilla Subramonian, Keval Patel
{"title":"Ureteral stent symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of mirabegron and tamsulosin","authors":"Daniel Madarshahian,&nbsp;Abdulrasheed Habeeb,&nbsp;Nimeshan Chandra-Segaran,&nbsp;Kesavapilla Subramonian,&nbsp;Keval Patel","doi":"10.1002/bco2.485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ureteral stent insertion, crucial for managing ureteral obstructions, often results in stent-related symptoms (SRSs) adversely affecting patient quality of life. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of tamsulosin or mirabegron versus placebo in alleviating these symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mirabegron or tamsulosin to placebo in managing SRSs. Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL, up to November 2023. The inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting on Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) assessments, analgesic usage and adverse events. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, assessing heterogeneity and publication bias. For assessing the risk of bias in the included randomized trials, we employed the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. This protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42024511842).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen RCTs with 1635 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tamsulosin significantly improved body pain (MD −1.80; 95% CI −3.53 to −0.07; <i>p</i> = 0.04), sexual function (MD −0.63; 95% CI −1.16 to −0.10; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and improved quality of life score (MD −2.36; 95% CI −3.56 to −1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.0001), while mirabegron was more effective in reducing urinary symptoms (MD −8.71; 95% CI −15.81 to −1.61; <i>p</i> = 0.02), enhancing general health (MD −2.58; 95% CI −3.78 to −1.37; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and reducing analgesia use (MD −1.56; 95% CI −2.70 to −0.41; <i>p</i> = 0.008). Both medications significantly reduced total International Prostate Symptom Score (Tamsulosin MD −8.4; 95% CI −15.63 to −1.22; <i>p</i> = 0.02; Mirabegron MD −6.29; 95% CI −8.50 to −4.08; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001) without a significant rise in adverse events (tamsulosin OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.40–9.18; mirabegron <i>p</i> = 0.42 and OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.30–2.88; <i>p</i> = 0.89).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Tamsulosin and mirabegron effectively manage SRSs, with distinct benefits in different symptom domains. This suggests a potential for complementary therapeutic strategies. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to explore their combined efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ureteral stent insertion, crucial for managing ureteral obstructions, often results in stent-related symptoms (SRSs) adversely affecting patient quality of life. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of tamsulosin or mirabegron versus placebo in alleviating these symptoms.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mirabegron or tamsulosin to placebo in managing SRSs. Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL, up to November 2023. The inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting on Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) assessments, analgesic usage and adverse events. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, assessing heterogeneity and publication bias. For assessing the risk of bias in the included randomized trials, we employed the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. This protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42024511842).

Results

Sixteen RCTs with 1635 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tamsulosin significantly improved body pain (MD −1.80; 95% CI −3.53 to −0.07; p = 0.04), sexual function (MD −0.63; 95% CI −1.16 to −0.10; p = 0.02) and improved quality of life score (MD −2.36; 95% CI −3.56 to −1.17; p = 0.0001), while mirabegron was more effective in reducing urinary symptoms (MD −8.71; 95% CI −15.81 to −1.61; p = 0.02), enhancing general health (MD −2.58; 95% CI −3.78 to −1.37; p < 0.0001) and reducing analgesia use (MD −1.56; 95% CI −2.70 to −0.41; p = 0.008). Both medications significantly reduced total International Prostate Symptom Score (Tamsulosin MD −8.4; 95% CI −15.63 to −1.22; p = 0.02; Mirabegron MD −6.29; 95% CI −8.50 to −4.08; p < 0.00001) without a significant rise in adverse events (tamsulosin OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.40–9.18; mirabegron p = 0.42 and OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.30–2.88; p = 0.89).

Conclusions

Tamsulosin and mirabegron effectively manage SRSs, with distinct benefits in different symptom domains. This suggests a potential for complementary therapeutic strategies. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to explore their combined efficacy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

输尿管支架症状:一项比较mirabegron和tamsulosin使用的系统回顾和荟萃分析
输尿管支架置入术是输尿管梗阻治疗的关键,经常导致支架相关症状(sss)对患者的生活质量产生不利影响。本荟萃分析比较了坦索罗辛或米拉贝隆与安慰剂在缓解这些症状方面的有效性。方法遵循PRISMA指南,我们系统地回顾了比较mirabegron或tamsulosin与安慰剂治疗srs的随机对照试验(rct)。数据来源包括PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和CENTRAL,截止到2023年11月。纳入标准集中于输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量(QoL)评估、镇痛药物使用和不良事件的研究。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型,评估异质性和发表偏倚。为了评估纳入的随机试验的偏倚风险,我们使用了Cochrane协作的工具。本方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册上注册(注册号:CRD42024511842)。结果16项rct共1635例患者符合纳入标准。Tamsulosin显著提高身体疼痛(MD−1.80;95%可信区间3.53−−0.07;p = 0.04),性功能(MD−0.63;95%可信区间1.16−−0.10;p = 0.02)和改善生活质量评分(MD−2.36;95%可信区间3.56−−1.17;p = 0.0001),而mirabegron更有效地降低尿症状(MD−8.71;95%可信区间15.81−−1.61;p = 0.02),提高整体健康(MD−2.58;95%可信区间3.78−−1.37;p & lt; 0.0001),减少镇痛使用(MD−1.56;95%可信区间2.70−−0.41;p = 0.008)。两种药物均显著降低国际前列腺症状评分(坦索洛新MD - 8.4, 95% CI - 15.63 - 1.22, p = 0.02;米拉比格龙MD - 6.29, 95% CI - 8.50 - 4.08, p < 0.00001),不良事件发生率无显著升高(坦索洛新OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.40-9.18;米拉比格龙p = 0.42, OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.30-2.88, p = 0.89)。结论坦索罗辛和米拉贝龙对srs有较好的治疗效果,对不同症状域疗效明显。这提示了补充治疗策略的潜力。未来需要高质量的随机对照试验来探索它们的联合疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信