Baozhou Sun, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Sasa Mutic, Chengyu Shi, Boyd M. C. McCurdy, Richard A. Popple, Minghui Lu, Taeho Kim, Jennifer R Clark, Peter B Greer
{"title":"AAPM TG report 330: EPID-based quality assurance of linear accelerators","authors":"Baozhou Sun, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Sasa Mutic, Chengyu Shi, Boyd M. C. McCurdy, Richard A. Popple, Minghui Lu, Taeho Kim, Jennifer R Clark, Peter B Greer","doi":"10.1002/mp.18114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been in widespread clinical use for almost two decades due to favorable measurement characteristics such as fast image acquisition, high sensitivity and resolution, digital data format, long-term stability, linear dose response, and large detection area. On-board EPIDs are widely used as a quality assurance (QA) tool to monitor nearly every aspect of linear accelerator (linac) performance. In both the commercial QA equipment market and in clinical practice, there is a trend toward replacing conventional QA approaches with fully automated, EPID-based QA tools. Despite widespread use, EPIDs are complex devices, and there has yet to be consensus or formal recommendations published by the AAPM for their use in routine linac QA. Task Group 330 (TG-330) was, therefore, formed to provide guidelines and recommendations for physicists on the safe and appropriate use of EPIDs for linac QA. In particular, the report: (a) provides a comprehensive review of the characteristics and limitations of EPIDs as time-resolved measurement devices and dosimeters; (b) summarizes the application of EPIDs for linac QA; (c) provides recommendations on efficient and effective implementations of EPID-based QA techniques; (d) describes risks associated with the use of EPIDs for linac QA and provides examples of how risk analysis can be used to ensure the safe use of EPIDs for linac QA. Many of the guidelines in this report are drawn from the literature that is included in the references and from the collective experience of the task group members. This report does not provide recommendations on the implementation of EPID-based patient-specific IMRT or VMAT QA, which is the topic of AAPM's report from AAPM TG-307.</p>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.18114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been in widespread clinical use for almost two decades due to favorable measurement characteristics such as fast image acquisition, high sensitivity and resolution, digital data format, long-term stability, linear dose response, and large detection area. On-board EPIDs are widely used as a quality assurance (QA) tool to monitor nearly every aspect of linear accelerator (linac) performance. In both the commercial QA equipment market and in clinical practice, there is a trend toward replacing conventional QA approaches with fully automated, EPID-based QA tools. Despite widespread use, EPIDs are complex devices, and there has yet to be consensus or formal recommendations published by the AAPM for their use in routine linac QA. Task Group 330 (TG-330) was, therefore, formed to provide guidelines and recommendations for physicists on the safe and appropriate use of EPIDs for linac QA. In particular, the report: (a) provides a comprehensive review of the characteristics and limitations of EPIDs as time-resolved measurement devices and dosimeters; (b) summarizes the application of EPIDs for linac QA; (c) provides recommendations on efficient and effective implementations of EPID-based QA techniques; (d) describes risks associated with the use of EPIDs for linac QA and provides examples of how risk analysis can be used to ensure the safe use of EPIDs for linac QA. Many of the guidelines in this report are drawn from the literature that is included in the references and from the collective experience of the task group members. This report does not provide recommendations on the implementation of EPID-based patient-specific IMRT or VMAT QA, which is the topic of AAPM's report from AAPM TG-307.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.