Examining the Effect of Social Desirability on the Relationships Between Personality Traits and Safety Performance

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Jidong Xue, Lu Zheng, Jingyi Li, Lina Wang, Kaiguang Liang, Carl, Jinyan Fan
{"title":"Examining the Effect of Social Desirability on the Relationships Between Personality Traits and Safety Performance","authors":"Jidong Xue,&nbsp;Lu Zheng,&nbsp;Jingyi Li,&nbsp;Lina Wang,&nbsp;Kaiguang Liang,&nbsp;Carl,&nbsp;Jinyan Fan","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Personality inventories can be used to identify safety-prone employees when making selection and job placement decisions. Self-report personality scores, however, are susceptible to social desirability. For personality inventories to be used with confidence in selecting and placing employees in safety-related positions, it is necessary to understand how social desirability influences the criterion-related validity of personality scores. In response, the current study examined whether two types of social desirability, self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM), suppress or moderate the relationship between personality scores and safety performance. Participants in this concurrent validation study were 95 blue-collar employees working at a chemical firm in China, who completed a self-report personality measure, and their supervisors rated their safety performance. Results indicated that (a) conscientiousness scores, but not agreeableness and emotional stability scores, were positively related to safety performance, and (b) SDE and IM scores moderated, rather than suppressed, the criterion-related validity of conscientiousness scores in predicting safety performance ratings such that the validity was stronger when SDE or IM scores were lower. These findings suggested that both SDE and IM may introduce criterion-irrelevant error into personality scores that weaken personality validity. Implications, study limitations, and future research directions were discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.70024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personality inventories can be used to identify safety-prone employees when making selection and job placement decisions. Self-report personality scores, however, are susceptible to social desirability. For personality inventories to be used with confidence in selecting and placing employees in safety-related positions, it is necessary to understand how social desirability influences the criterion-related validity of personality scores. In response, the current study examined whether two types of social desirability, self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM), suppress or moderate the relationship between personality scores and safety performance. Participants in this concurrent validation study were 95 blue-collar employees working at a chemical firm in China, who completed a self-report personality measure, and their supervisors rated their safety performance. Results indicated that (a) conscientiousness scores, but not agreeableness and emotional stability scores, were positively related to safety performance, and (b) SDE and IM scores moderated, rather than suppressed, the criterion-related validity of conscientiousness scores in predicting safety performance ratings such that the validity was stronger when SDE or IM scores were lower. These findings suggested that both SDE and IM may introduce criterion-irrelevant error into personality scores that weaken personality validity. Implications, study limitations, and future research directions were discussed.

社会期望对人格特质与安全绩效关系的影响
在做出选择和工作安排的决定时,人格量表可以用来识别有安全倾向的员工。然而,自我报告的人格得分容易受到社会期望的影响。为了使人格量表在安全相关职位的选择和安置中有信心地使用,有必要了解社会期望如何影响人格分数的标准相关效度。为此,本研究考察了两种类型的社会期望,即自我欺骗增强(SDE)和印象管理(IM)是否抑制或调节人格得分与安全绩效之间的关系。本研究的参与者为95名在中国某化工企业工作的蓝领员工,他们完成了一项自我报告人格测试,由他们的主管对他们的安全表现进行评估。结果表明:(a)尽责性得分与安全绩效呈正相关,而随和性和情绪稳定性得分与安全绩效呈正相关;(b) SDE和IM得分调节了而不是抑制了尽责性得分预测安全绩效评级的标准相关效度,当SDE或IM得分较低时,效度越强。这些发现表明,SDE和IM都可能在人格得分中引入标准无关误差,从而削弱人格效度。讨论了研究的意义、局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信