Potential gains from radical treatment of men with prostate cancer according to life expectancy

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70076
Sandra Irenaeus, Hans Garmo, Rolf Gedeborg, Mats Ahlberg, David Robinson, Pär Stattin, Kerri Beckmann
{"title":"Potential gains from radical treatment of men with prostate cancer according to life expectancy","authors":"Sandra Irenaeus,&nbsp;Hans Garmo,&nbsp;Rolf Gedeborg,&nbsp;Mats Ahlberg,&nbsp;David Robinson,&nbsp;Pär Stattin,&nbsp;Kerri Beckmann","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the impact of age and life expectancy on treatment decisions and its consequences for outcomes among men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied men in Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) diagnosed between 2008 and 2022 with intermediate-risk or high-risk localized or locally advanced PCa and life expectancy between 2.5 and 15 years in the absence of PCa. Estimates of life expectancy were based on age and two comorbidity indices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 32 196 men were included in the analyses. Of these, 17 419 (54%) had a life expectancy between 10 and 15 years, of whom 11 147 (64%) received primary radical treatment. Age had a stronger influence than life expectancy on the selection of treatment. Around 10% of deaths within 10 years of diagnosis could potentially have been avoided if men with &gt;10 years life expectancy, regardless of age, had received radical treatment, based on assumptions of high treatment efficacy (30% reduction in all-cause mortality) and high uptake of treatment (90%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A substantial proportion of healthy older men with intermediate and high-risk PCa did not undergo radical treatment. According to our model and assumptions, 10% of deaths within 10 years of diagnosis in these men could potentially have been avoided if they had received radical treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the impact of age and life expectancy on treatment decisions and its consequences for outcomes among men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

We studied men in Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) diagnosed between 2008 and 2022 with intermediate-risk or high-risk localized or locally advanced PCa and life expectancy between 2.5 and 15 years in the absence of PCa. Estimates of life expectancy were based on age and two comorbidity indices.

Results

A total of 32 196 men were included in the analyses. Of these, 17 419 (54%) had a life expectancy between 10 and 15 years, of whom 11 147 (64%) received primary radical treatment. Age had a stronger influence than life expectancy on the selection of treatment. Around 10% of deaths within 10 years of diagnosis could potentially have been avoided if men with >10 years life expectancy, regardless of age, had received radical treatment, based on assumptions of high treatment efficacy (30% reduction in all-cause mortality) and high uptake of treatment (90%).

Conclusion

A substantial proportion of healthy older men with intermediate and high-risk PCa did not undergo radical treatment. According to our model and assumptions, 10% of deaths within 10 years of diagnosis in these men could potentially have been avoided if they had received radical treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前列腺癌根治性治疗的潜在收益与预期寿命
目的探讨年龄和预期寿命对中高危前列腺癌(PCa)患者治疗决策的影响及其对预后的影响。材料和方法:我们研究了2008年至2022年间在瑞典前列腺癌数据库(PCBaSe)中诊断为中度或高风险局部或局部晚期前列腺癌的男性,在没有前列腺癌的情况下,预期寿命在2.5年至15年之间。预期寿命的估计是基于年龄和两个合并症指数。结果共纳入32 196名男性。其中,17419人(54%)的预期寿命在10至15年之间,其中1147人(64%)接受了初级根治性治疗。年龄比预期寿命对治疗选择的影响更大。根据高疗效(全因死亡率降低30%)和高接受治疗率(90%)的假设,如果预期寿命为10年的男性(无论年龄)接受根治性治疗,10年内大约10%的死亡是可能避免的。结论相当比例的健康老年男性中高危前列腺癌患者未接受根治性治疗。根据我们的模型和假设,如果接受根治性治疗,这些男性在确诊后的10年内有10%的死亡是可以避免的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信