Yeong Eun Sim, Minyoul Kim, Jae-il Lee, Jin Young Kim
{"title":"Determination of Aripiprazole, Blonanserin, and Their Metabolites in Human Urine by Automated μSPE–LC–MS/MS","authors":"Yeong Eun Sim, Minyoul Kim, Jae-il Lee, Jin Young Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10337-025-04419-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, an automated micro-solid-phase extraction (μSPE)–liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric (LC–MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, blonanserin, and N-desmethyl blonanserin in human urine. An instrument top sample preparation cartridge was implemented to enhance analyte sensitivity and mitigate the matrix effects from urine samples. LC–MS/MS analysis employed a multiple-reaction monitoring mode, with analyte separation achieved using a Capcell Pak C18 MGIII column (2.0 × 150 mm, 5 µm). The mobile phase comprised a 10 mM ammonium formate solution with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile. The calibration range for all analytes was 0.1–50 ng mL<sup>−1</sup>, yielding correlation coefficients (<i>r</i>) of ≥ 0.9993 and a weighting factor of 1/x<sup>2</sup>. The detection limits for all analytes were 0.03 ng mL<sup>−1</sup>. Intra- and inter-day accuracy ranged from − 3.6 to 5.0% and − 4.0 to 3.3%, respectively, with precision values of ≤ 9.5% and ≤ 12.9%. This validated method was successfully applied to 107 forensic urine samples. Urinary creatinine normalization was used to adjust analyte concentrations in urine. Normalized concentrations of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, blonanserin, and N-desethyl blonanserin were detected at 0.1–185.2 (n = 86), 0.2–295.5 (n = 91), 0.1–0.7 (n = 7), and 0.2–1.6 (n = 12) ng mg<sup>−1</sup> creatinine, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":518,"journal":{"name":"Chromatographia","volume":"88 8","pages":"595 - 613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chromatographia","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10337-025-04419-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, an automated micro-solid-phase extraction (μSPE)–liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric (LC–MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, blonanserin, and N-desmethyl blonanserin in human urine. An instrument top sample preparation cartridge was implemented to enhance analyte sensitivity and mitigate the matrix effects from urine samples. LC–MS/MS analysis employed a multiple-reaction monitoring mode, with analyte separation achieved using a Capcell Pak C18 MGIII column (2.0 × 150 mm, 5 µm). The mobile phase comprised a 10 mM ammonium formate solution with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile. The calibration range for all analytes was 0.1–50 ng mL−1, yielding correlation coefficients (r) of ≥ 0.9993 and a weighting factor of 1/x2. The detection limits for all analytes were 0.03 ng mL−1. Intra- and inter-day accuracy ranged from − 3.6 to 5.0% and − 4.0 to 3.3%, respectively, with precision values of ≤ 9.5% and ≤ 12.9%. This validated method was successfully applied to 107 forensic urine samples. Urinary creatinine normalization was used to adjust analyte concentrations in urine. Normalized concentrations of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, blonanserin, and N-desethyl blonanserin were detected at 0.1–185.2 (n = 86), 0.2–295.5 (n = 91), 0.1–0.7 (n = 7), and 0.2–1.6 (n = 12) ng mg−1 creatinine, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Separation sciences, in all their various forms such as chromatography, field-flow fractionation, and electrophoresis, provide some of the most powerful techniques in analytical chemistry and are applied within a number of important application areas, including archaeology, biotechnology, clinical, environmental, food, medical, petroleum, pharmaceutical, polymer and biopolymer research. Beyond serving analytical purposes, separation techniques are also used for preparative and process-scale applications. The scope and power of separation sciences is significantly extended by combination with spectroscopic detection methods (e.g., laser-based approaches, nuclear-magnetic resonance, Raman, chemiluminescence) and particularly, mass spectrometry, to create hyphenated techniques. In addition to exciting new developments in chromatography, such as ultra high-pressure systems, multidimensional separations, and high-temperature approaches, there have also been great advances in hybrid methods combining chromatography and electro-based separations, especially on the micro- and nanoscale. Integrated biological procedures (e.g., enzymatic, immunological, receptor-based assays) can also be part of the overall analytical process.