Flexibility Options: A Proposed Product for Managing Imbalance Risk

Elina Spyrou;Qiwei Zhang;Robin B. Hytowitz;Benjamin F. Hobbs;Siddharth Tyagi;Mengmeng Cai;Michael Blonsky
{"title":"Flexibility Options: A Proposed Product for Managing Imbalance Risk","authors":"Elina Spyrou;Qiwei Zhang;Robin B. Hytowitz;Benjamin F. Hobbs;Siddharth Tyagi;Mengmeng Cai;Michael Blonsky","doi":"10.1109/TEMPR.2025.3529689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of variable renewable energy resources with uncertain outputs in day-ahead electricity markets results in additional balancing needs in real-time. Addressing those needs cost-effectively and reliably within a competitive market with unbundled products is challenging as both the demand for and the availability of flexibility depends on day-ahead energy schedules. Existing approaches for reserve procurement usually rely either on oversimplified demand curves that do not consider how system conditions that particular day affect the value of flexibility, or on bilateral trading of hedging instruments that are not co-optimized with day-ahead schedules. This article presents and analyzes a new product, ‘Flexibility Options’, which system operators could consider to address these two limitations. The demand for this product is endogenously determined in the day-ahead market and it is met cost-effectively by considering real-time supply curves for product providers, which are co-optimized with the energy supply. As we illustrate with numerical examples and mathematical analysis, the product addresses the hedging needs of participants with imbalances cost-effectively, provides a less intermittent revenue stream for participants with flexible outputs, promotes value-driven pricing of flexibility, and ensures that the system operator is revenue-neutral. This article provides a comprehensive design that can be further tested and applied in large-scale systems.","PeriodicalId":100639,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","volume":"3 3","pages":"260-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10847927/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of variable renewable energy resources with uncertain outputs in day-ahead electricity markets results in additional balancing needs in real-time. Addressing those needs cost-effectively and reliably within a competitive market with unbundled products is challenging as both the demand for and the availability of flexibility depends on day-ahead energy schedules. Existing approaches for reserve procurement usually rely either on oversimplified demand curves that do not consider how system conditions that particular day affect the value of flexibility, or on bilateral trading of hedging instruments that are not co-optimized with day-ahead schedules. This article presents and analyzes a new product, ‘Flexibility Options’, which system operators could consider to address these two limitations. The demand for this product is endogenously determined in the day-ahead market and it is met cost-effectively by considering real-time supply curves for product providers, which are co-optimized with the energy supply. As we illustrate with numerical examples and mathematical analysis, the product addresses the hedging needs of participants with imbalances cost-effectively, provides a less intermittent revenue stream for participants with flexible outputs, promotes value-driven pricing of flexibility, and ensures that the system operator is revenue-neutral. This article provides a comprehensive design that can be further tested and applied in large-scale systems.
灵活性选择:管理不平衡风险的建议产品
日前电力市场中存在输出不确定的可变可再生能源,导致了实时的额外平衡需求。在竞争激烈的非捆绑产品市场中,以经济有效和可靠的方式解决这些需求是具有挑战性的,因为对灵活性的需求和可用性都取决于前一天的能源计划。现有的储备采购方法通常要么依赖于过于简化的需求曲线,而不考虑特定日期的系统条件如何影响灵活性的价值,要么依赖于对冲工具的双边交易,这些工具没有与前一天的时间表共同优化。本文提出并分析了一种新产品“灵活性选项”,系统运营商可以考虑解决这两个限制。该产品的需求由日前市场内生决定,通过考虑与能源供应协同优化的产品供应商的实时供应曲线,成本有效地满足该需求。正如我们用数值例子和数学分析说明的那样,该产品解决了具有成本效益的不平衡参与者的对冲需求,为具有灵活产出的参与者提供了较少的间歇性收入流,促进了灵活性的价值驱动定价,并确保系统运营商是收入中性的。本文提供了一个全面的设计,可以进一步测试和应用于大型系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信