Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Single-Use and Multipackage Bottled Water: Inter- and Intra-analyses of 26 Bottled Water Brands in the USA

IF 4.3 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Md Rasheduzzaman, Breanna Lytton, Emily Wilcox, Arpita Das, Margaret Wirth, Alvaro Hurtado, Leigh-Anne Krometis and Alasdair Cohen*, 
{"title":"Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Single-Use and Multipackage Bottled Water: Inter- and Intra-analyses of 26 Bottled Water Brands in the USA","authors":"Md Rasheduzzaman,&nbsp;Breanna Lytton,&nbsp;Emily Wilcox,&nbsp;Arpita Das,&nbsp;Margaret Wirth,&nbsp;Alvaro Hurtado,&nbsp;Leigh-Anne Krometis and Alasdair Cohen*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Relatively few published studies have assessed the microbiological or chemical quality of bottled water in the USA. We purchased all single and multipackage bottled water sold in grocery and retail stores in one county in Virginia. 107 samples, across 26 brands, were tested for pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, total coliform, <i>E. coli</i>, nitrate, sulfate, free chlorine, total trihalomethanes (THMs, a component of disinfection byproducts), fluoride, and heavy metals. 64.5% (<i>n</i> = 69) of samples were purified water and 35.5% (<i>n</i> = 38) were spring water. Contaminant concentrations were higher overall in spring water samples. Total coliforms and <i>E. coli</i> were not detected in any samples. 1.4% (<i>n</i> = 1) of purified bottled water samples exceeded regulatory standards for THM (80 ppb), and 7.2% (<i>n</i> = 5) and 10.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of purified and spring samples exceeded 1/2 the THM standard, respectively. No spring water samples exceeded standards for heavy metals, but one purified bottled water sample exceeded the standard for cadmium. We observed considerable within-brand variability in concentrations for a number of parameters including THMs, calcium, silicon, and strontium. This is the first study we are aware of to analyze contaminant variability within bottled water brands. Our results indicate that monitoring and reporting requirements for bottled water should be improved.</p><p >Almost all tested bottled water samples complied with regulatory standards; however, a few did not, and we observed considerable within-brand variability for some parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 9","pages":"5471–5481"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relatively few published studies have assessed the microbiological or chemical quality of bottled water in the USA. We purchased all single and multipackage bottled water sold in grocery and retail stores in one county in Virginia. 107 samples, across 26 brands, were tested for pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, total coliform, E. coli, nitrate, sulfate, free chlorine, total trihalomethanes (THMs, a component of disinfection byproducts), fluoride, and heavy metals. 64.5% (n = 69) of samples were purified water and 35.5% (n = 38) were spring water. Contaminant concentrations were higher overall in spring water samples. Total coliforms and E. coli were not detected in any samples. 1.4% (n = 1) of purified bottled water samples exceeded regulatory standards for THM (80 ppb), and 7.2% (n = 5) and 10.5% (n = 4) of purified and spring samples exceeded 1/2 the THM standard, respectively. No spring water samples exceeded standards for heavy metals, but one purified bottled water sample exceeded the standard for cadmium. We observed considerable within-brand variability in concentrations for a number of parameters including THMs, calcium, silicon, and strontium. This is the first study we are aware of to analyze contaminant variability within bottled water brands. Our results indicate that monitoring and reporting requirements for bottled water should be improved.

Almost all tested bottled water samples complied with regulatory standards; however, a few did not, and we observed considerable within-brand variability for some parameters.

一次性和多包装瓶装水中的微生物和化学污染物:美国26个瓶装水品牌的内部和内部分析
相对较少发表的研究评估了美国瓶装水的微生物或化学质量。我们购买了弗吉尼亚州一个县杂货店和零售店出售的所有单包装和多包装瓶装水,对26个品牌的107个样品进行了pH值、电导率、溶解氧、总大肠菌群、大肠杆菌、硝酸盐、硫酸盐、游离氯、总三卤甲烷(THMs,消毒副产品的一种成分)、氟化物和重金属的测试。纯净水占64.5% (n = 69),泉水占35.5% (n = 38)。泉水样本中的污染物浓度总体较高。未检出总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。1.4% (n = 1)的纯化瓶装水样品超过THM (80 ppb)的监管标准,7.2% (n = 5)和10.5% (n = 4)的纯化瓶装水和泉水样品分别超过THM标准的一半。没有泉水样品重金属超标,但有一个纯化瓶装水样品镉超标。我们观察到包括THMs、钙、硅和锶在内的许多参数的浓度在品牌内具有相当大的可变性。这是我们所知的第一个分析瓶装水品牌污染物可变性的研究。我们的研究结果表明,瓶装水的监测和报告要求有待改进。几乎所有经过测试的瓶装水样本都符合监管标准;然而,少数没有,我们观察到一些参数在品牌内的相当大的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信