China’s Clean Air Actions Have Reduced Rural-Urban and Geographic Disparities in Air Pollution Exposure

Can Dong, Xinfeng Wang, Rui Gao, Yingzhe Guo, Yuqiang Zhang*, Drew Shindell*, Wenxing Wang and Likun Xue*, 
{"title":"China’s Clean Air Actions Have Reduced Rural-Urban and Geographic Disparities in Air Pollution Exposure","authors":"Can Dong,&nbsp;Xinfeng Wang,&nbsp;Rui Gao,&nbsp;Yingzhe Guo,&nbsp;Yuqiang Zhang*,&nbsp;Drew Shindell*,&nbsp;Wenxing Wang and Likun Xue*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.5c00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >China’s air quality has improved significantly since 2013 due to the implementation of strict clean air policies prioritizing highly polluted regions. However, the effectiveness of those actions on reducing environmental inequality is not clear. Here, we analyzed the air pollution disparity changes in China from 2013 to 2018 using a combination of air quality, population and urbanization data. For PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and CO, we found a general decline in both rural-urban disparity and geographic disparity, with SO<sub>2</sub> and CO showing the most substantial reductions. For O<sub>3</sub>, we found mixed changes in rural-urban disparity and an increase in geographic disparity. Our findings suggest that China’s air pollution control strategies have been effective in improving overall air quality and reducing exposure inequalities. We underscore the importance of strategies to reduce NO<sub>2</sub> emissions, given its significant rural-urban and geographic disparities, and its role as a precursor to both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>. This study highlights the effectiveness of China’s clean air actions from a different perspective and emphasizes the need to further improve air quality and alleviate remaining disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 9","pages":"1884–1891"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China’s air quality has improved significantly since 2013 due to the implementation of strict clean air policies prioritizing highly polluted regions. However, the effectiveness of those actions on reducing environmental inequality is not clear. Here, we analyzed the air pollution disparity changes in China from 2013 to 2018 using a combination of air quality, population and urbanization data. For PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2 and CO, we found a general decline in both rural-urban disparity and geographic disparity, with SO2 and CO showing the most substantial reductions. For O3, we found mixed changes in rural-urban disparity and an increase in geographic disparity. Our findings suggest that China’s air pollution control strategies have been effective in improving overall air quality and reducing exposure inequalities. We underscore the importance of strategies to reduce NO2 emissions, given its significant rural-urban and geographic disparities, and its role as a precursor to both PM2.5 and O3. This study highlights the effectiveness of China’s clean air actions from a different perspective and emphasizes the need to further improve air quality and alleviate remaining disparities.

Abstract Image

中国的清洁空气行动减少了城乡和地区在空气污染暴露方面的差异
自2013年以来,由于实施了严格的清洁空气政策,优先考虑高污染地区,中国的空气质量得到了显着改善。然而,这些行动在减少环境不平等方面的有效性尚不清楚。在这里,我们结合空气质量、人口和城市化数据,分析了2013年至2018年中国空气污染差异的变化。对于PM2.5、PM10、NO2、SO2和CO,我们发现城乡差异和地域差异都在普遍下降,其中SO2和CO的下降幅度最大。对于O3,我们发现城乡差异的混合变化和地理差异的增加。我们的研究结果表明,中国的空气污染控制策略在改善整体空气质量和减少暴露不平等方面是有效的。鉴于二氧化氮在城乡和地理上的巨大差异,以及它作为PM2.5和O3的前兆的作用,我们强调减少二氧化氮排放战略的重要性。本研究从不同的角度强调了中国清洁空气行动的有效性,并强调了进一步改善空气质量和缩小剩余差距的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信