Intervention Counseling for Return to Sex After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shunaha Kim-Fine,Lauren Caldwell,Jaime Long,Kate V Meriwether,Shilpa Iyer,Christine A Heisler,Patricia Hudson,Katherine Husk,Svjetlana Lozo,Veronica Demtchouk,Beili Huang,Danielle D Antosh,Rebecca G Rogers,
{"title":"Intervention Counseling for Return to Sex After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Shunaha Kim-Fine,Lauren Caldwell,Jaime Long,Kate V Meriwether,Shilpa Iyer,Christine A Heisler,Patricia Hudson,Katherine Husk,Svjetlana Lozo,Veronica Demtchouk,Beili Huang,Danielle D Antosh,Rebecca G Rogers, ","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo compare the effect of intervention on patients' postoperative preparedness to return to sexual activity after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence (UI) surgery compared with the usual counseling regarding the first sexual encounter.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited individuals who were planning to be sexually active after surgery for POP or UI; the patients who were randomized to intervention or usual counseling at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was preparedness to return to sexual activity. Patients were considered prepared if they answered \"strongly agree\" or \"agree\" on a 6-point Likert scale to the statement, \"Overall, I feel prepared for resuming sexual activity after my surgery.\" Participants were contacted at 1-month intervals up to 6 months postoperatively; when they reported return to sexual activity, they completed preparedness and pain scales and the PISQ-IR (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 186 patients, 170 (91.4%) completed follow-up and were included in the analyses. There was no difference in preparedness to return to sexual activity, at the time of returning to sexual activity within 6 months. However, there were differences noted 6 to 8 weeks after the intervention counseling. Patients randomized to intervention counseling reported higher preparedness to return to sexual activity (odds ratio [OR] 2.42, 95% CI, 1.03-5.65), lower likelihood of experiencing dyspareunia (OR 0.27, 95% CI, 0.09-0.86), and an earlier return to sexual activity (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% CI, 1.06-2.01). Before the intervention, 57 (33.5%) patients returned to sexual activity. In sensitivity analysis of the remaining 113 participants, intervention counseling remained associated with greater preparedness at 6-8 weeks postoperatively (81.0% vs 56.9%, adjusted OR 4.82, 95% CI, 1.66-13.99).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIntervention counseling regarding return to sexual activity after surgeries for POP or UI was not associated with improved patient preparedness at the time of return to sexual activity but did improve preparedness and decrease dyspareunia at 6-8 weeks, compared with usual counseling. Despite counseling otherwise, nearly a third of participants returned to sexual activity before 6-8 weeks postoperatively.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05342090.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of intervention on patients' postoperative preparedness to return to sexual activity after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence (UI) surgery compared with the usual counseling regarding the first sexual encounter. METHODS This multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited individuals who were planning to be sexually active after surgery for POP or UI; the patients who were randomized to intervention or usual counseling at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was preparedness to return to sexual activity. Patients were considered prepared if they answered "strongly agree" or "agree" on a 6-point Likert scale to the statement, "Overall, I feel prepared for resuming sexual activity after my surgery." Participants were contacted at 1-month intervals up to 6 months postoperatively; when they reported return to sexual activity, they completed preparedness and pain scales and the PISQ-IR (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised). RESULTS Of 186 patients, 170 (91.4%) completed follow-up and were included in the analyses. There was no difference in preparedness to return to sexual activity, at the time of returning to sexual activity within 6 months. However, there were differences noted 6 to 8 weeks after the intervention counseling. Patients randomized to intervention counseling reported higher preparedness to return to sexual activity (odds ratio [OR] 2.42, 95% CI, 1.03-5.65), lower likelihood of experiencing dyspareunia (OR 0.27, 95% CI, 0.09-0.86), and an earlier return to sexual activity (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% CI, 1.06-2.01). Before the intervention, 57 (33.5%) patients returned to sexual activity. In sensitivity analysis of the remaining 113 participants, intervention counseling remained associated with greater preparedness at 6-8 weeks postoperatively (81.0% vs 56.9%, adjusted OR 4.82, 95% CI, 1.66-13.99). CONCLUSION Intervention counseling regarding return to sexual activity after surgeries for POP or UI was not associated with improved patient preparedness at the time of return to sexual activity but did improve preparedness and decrease dyspareunia at 6-8 weeks, compared with usual counseling. Despite counseling otherwise, nearly a third of participants returned to sexual activity before 6-8 weeks postoperatively. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05342090.
泌尿妇科手术后恢复性生活的干预咨询:一项随机对照试验。
目的比较干预对盆腔器官脱垂(POP)或尿失禁(UI)手术患者术后恢复性生活准备的影响,并与常规的第一次性行为咨询进行比较。方法:该多中心随机临床试验招募了计划在POP或UI手术后性生活活跃的个体;患者在术后6 - 8周随机接受干预或常规咨询。主要结果是准备好重返性活动。如果患者在6分的李克特量表中回答“总体而言,我觉得我准备好在手术后恢复性活动”,那么他们就被认为做好了准备。术后每隔1个月至6个月与参与者进行联系;当他们报告恢复性活动时,他们完成了准备和疼痛量表以及PISQ-IR(骨盆器官脱垂/尿失禁性问卷,iuga修订)。结果186例患者中,170例(91.4%)完成随访并纳入分析。在6个月内重返性活动的准备程度上没有差异。然而,在干预咨询后6至8周,存在差异。随机分配到干预咨询组的患者报告称,恢复性活动的准备程度较高(比值比[OR] 2.42, 95% CI, 1.03-5.65),经历性交困难的可能性较低(比值比[OR] 0.27, 95% CI, 0.09-0.86),并且更早恢复性活动(风险比1.46,95% CI, 1.06-2.01)。干预前,57例(33.5%)患者恢复了性行为。在其余113名参与者的敏感性分析中,干预咨询与术后6-8周的更大准备相关(81.0% vs 56.9%,调整OR 4.82, 95% CI, 1.66-13.99)。结论:与常规咨询相比,针对POP或UI术后恢复性活动的干预咨询与改善患者恢复性活动时的准备无关,但确实改善了6-8周的准备并减少了性交困难。尽管有咨询,但近三分之一的参与者在术后6-8周内恢复了性行为。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov, NCT05342090。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信