The effects of over- and under-stuffing the anterior knee compartment in primary TKA: A systematic review.

IF 5
Christos Koutserimpas, Vasileios Giovanoulis, Mo Saffarini, Michel Bonnin, Michael T Hirschmann, Sébastien Lustig
{"title":"The effects of over- and under-stuffing the anterior knee compartment in primary TKA: A systematic review.","authors":"Christos Koutserimpas, Vasileios Giovanoulis, Mo Saffarini, Michel Bonnin, Michael T Hirschmann, Sébastien Lustig","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Up to 20% of patients remain dissatisfied following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), often due to anterior knee pain (AKP) and other patellofemoral complications. Several studies highlighted risks of over- or under-stuffing within the patellofemoral compartment, yet there are no standardised methods for their assessment, and their effects on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remain unclear. The aim of this review was to synthesise and critically appraise all published studies that investigated effects of over- and under-stuffing the anterior compartment on PROMs following primary TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol for this systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines was registered on PROSPERO (July 2024), before electronic searches by two readers (C.K. and V.G.) using Medline and Scopus. The authors included clinical studies published in English, reporting a quantifiable method to assess the anterior compartment in TKA, with clinical and/or radiographic outcomes. The authors excluded in vitro or ex vivo studies, reviews or editorials, studies on revision TKA and studies with follow-up <1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches returned 160 records, of which 14 met the eligibility criteria (10 retrospective and 4 prospective), representing 4404 knees in 3718 patients. The primary outcome was over-stuffing in five studies, which investigated its correlation with PROMs and/or AKP, while the primary outcome was under-stuffing in two studies. The PROMs reported were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (eight studies), knee society score (six studies), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (two studies), as well as Oxford knee score, forgotten joint score and Kujala scores (each one study). Only two studies used dynamic assessments, while 12 used static assessments. Only 3 of the 14 studies found significant effects of over-stuffing (by >5 mm) on PROMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in anterior offset, particularly over-stuffing, may cause patellofemoral complications. Although it would be ideal to restore the anterior compartment, small deviations do not affect clinical outcomes. A threshold of 5 mm could represent the 'safe zone' for change in anterior offset in patients undergoing TKA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Up to 20% of patients remain dissatisfied following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), often due to anterior knee pain (AKP) and other patellofemoral complications. Several studies highlighted risks of over- or under-stuffing within the patellofemoral compartment, yet there are no standardised methods for their assessment, and their effects on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remain unclear. The aim of this review was to synthesise and critically appraise all published studies that investigated effects of over- and under-stuffing the anterior compartment on PROMs following primary TKA.

Methods: The protocol for this systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines was registered on PROSPERO (July 2024), before electronic searches by two readers (C.K. and V.G.) using Medline and Scopus. The authors included clinical studies published in English, reporting a quantifiable method to assess the anterior compartment in TKA, with clinical and/or radiographic outcomes. The authors excluded in vitro or ex vivo studies, reviews or editorials, studies on revision TKA and studies with follow-up <1 year.

Results: Searches returned 160 records, of which 14 met the eligibility criteria (10 retrospective and 4 prospective), representing 4404 knees in 3718 patients. The primary outcome was over-stuffing in five studies, which investigated its correlation with PROMs and/or AKP, while the primary outcome was under-stuffing in two studies. The PROMs reported were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (eight studies), knee society score (six studies), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (two studies), as well as Oxford knee score, forgotten joint score and Kujala scores (each one study). Only two studies used dynamic assessments, while 12 used static assessments. Only 3 of the 14 studies found significant effects of over-stuffing (by >5 mm) on PROMs.

Conclusions: Changes in anterior offset, particularly over-stuffing, may cause patellofemoral complications. Although it would be ideal to restore the anterior compartment, small deviations do not affect clinical outcomes. A threshold of 5 mm could represent the 'safe zone' for change in anterior offset in patients undergoing TKA.

Level of evidence: Level III.

在原发性全膝关节置换术中,膝关节前腔室填充物过多和过少的影响:一项系统综述。
目的:高达20%的患者在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后仍然不满意,通常是由于膝关节前侧疼痛(AKP)和其他髌骨股并发症。一些研究强调了髌股间室内填充物过多或过少的风险,但没有标准化的评估方法,而且它们对患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的影响仍不清楚。本综述的目的是综合并批判性地评价所有已发表的研究,这些研究调查了原发性TKA后前房室填充物过多和填充物不足对prom的影响。方法:本系统评价的方案遵循PRISMA指南,在PROSPERO(2024年7月)上注册,然后由两位读者(C.K.和V.G.)使用Medline和Scopus进行电子检索。作者纳入了用英文发表的临床研究,报告了一种评估TKA前房室的可量化方法,以及临床和/或影像学结果。作者排除了体外或离体研究、综述或社论、修订TKA研究和随访研究。结果:检索返回160条记录,其中14条符合资格标准(10条回顾性和4条前瞻性),涉及3718例患者的4404个膝关节。五项研究的主要结果是过度填充,研究了其与PROMs和/或AKP的相关性,而两项研究的主要结果是填充不足。报告的PROMs是西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(8项研究),膝关节社会评分(6项研究),膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(2项研究),以及牛津膝关节评分,遗忘关节评分和Kujala评分(每项研究)。只有两项研究使用了动态评估,而12项研究使用了静态评估。在14项研究中,只有3项研究发现过度填充对prom有显著影响(超过50毫米)。结论:前偏位的改变,特别是过度填充,可能导致髌股并发症。虽然恢复前腔室是理想的,但小的偏差不会影响临床结果。5毫米的阈值可以代表TKA患者前偏移变化的“安全区域”。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信