[Comparison of Target Phase Positioning with Respiratory Motion between Four-dimensional CT and Four-dimensional Cone Beam CT: A Phantom Study].

Shinji Mawatari, Yoshifumi Oku, Masahiko Toyota
{"title":"[Comparison of Target Phase Positioning with Respiratory Motion between Four-dimensional CT and Four-dimensional Cone Beam CT: A Phantom Study].","authors":"Shinji Mawatari, Yoshifumi Oku, Masahiko Toyota","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the most commonly used technique for target localization in radiation therapy. Four-dimensional CBCT (4D CBCT) is valuable for localizing tumors in the lung and liver regions, where the localization accuracy is affected by respiratory motions. However, in image-guided radiation therapy for organs subject to respiratory motion, position verification is often performed using 3D cone beam CT or 2D X-ray images. While it is possible to collimate tumors at specific respiratory phases during breath-holding and to determine the tumor's motion range by taking inspiratory and expiratory breath-hold images, it remains difficult to track the tumor's trajectory at each respiratory phase. The aim of this study is to investigate the positional phases of targets that move with respiration using phantom experiments with 4D CT and 4D CBCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To simulate respiratory motion, we captured images of a moving phantom with a simulated tumor synchronized to simulated breathing using 4D CT and 4D CBCT. The simulated tumor was set to have respiratory cycles of 3, 4, 5, and 7.5 s, with displacements 20, 16, 10, 8, and 4 mm per breath. Under these conditions, 4D CT and 4D CBCT images were captured. Using the treatment planning system, regions of interest for the simulated tumors were set from the obtained images of each respiratory phase, identifying the tumor and setting the region as the target. Volume, positional error, and Dice coefficient of the target centroid in the corresponding phase images of 4D CT and 4D CBCT were measured with the treatment planning system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positional error of the target centroid between 4D CT and 4D CBCT was generally within ±1 mm. The Dice coefficient for each respiratory phase under each condition of 4D CT and 4D CBCT was generally above 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It has been suggested that 4D CBCT has the same detection ability as 4D CT for targets with respiratory movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the most commonly used technique for target localization in radiation therapy. Four-dimensional CBCT (4D CBCT) is valuable for localizing tumors in the lung and liver regions, where the localization accuracy is affected by respiratory motions. However, in image-guided radiation therapy for organs subject to respiratory motion, position verification is often performed using 3D cone beam CT or 2D X-ray images. While it is possible to collimate tumors at specific respiratory phases during breath-holding and to determine the tumor's motion range by taking inspiratory and expiratory breath-hold images, it remains difficult to track the tumor's trajectory at each respiratory phase. The aim of this study is to investigate the positional phases of targets that move with respiration using phantom experiments with 4D CT and 4D CBCT.

Methods: To simulate respiratory motion, we captured images of a moving phantom with a simulated tumor synchronized to simulated breathing using 4D CT and 4D CBCT. The simulated tumor was set to have respiratory cycles of 3, 4, 5, and 7.5 s, with displacements 20, 16, 10, 8, and 4 mm per breath. Under these conditions, 4D CT and 4D CBCT images were captured. Using the treatment planning system, regions of interest for the simulated tumors were set from the obtained images of each respiratory phase, identifying the tumor and setting the region as the target. Volume, positional error, and Dice coefficient of the target centroid in the corresponding phase images of 4D CT and 4D CBCT were measured with the treatment planning system.

Results: The positional error of the target centroid between 4D CT and 4D CBCT was generally within ±1 mm. The Dice coefficient for each respiratory phase under each condition of 4D CT and 4D CBCT was generally above 0.8.

Conclusion: It has been suggested that 4D CBCT has the same detection ability as 4D CT for targets with respiratory movement.

[四维CT与四维锥束CT的呼吸运动目标相位定位比较:一项幻象研究]。
目的:锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是放射治疗中最常用的靶定位技术。四维CBCT (4D CBCT)对肺和肝脏肿瘤的定位有价值,其定位精度受呼吸运动的影响。然而,在呼吸运动器官的图像引导放射治疗中,通常使用三维锥束CT或二维x射线图像进行位置验证。虽然可以在屏气过程中对特定呼吸阶段的肿瘤进行准直,并通过拍摄吸气和呼气屏气图像来确定肿瘤的运动范围,但在每个呼吸阶段跟踪肿瘤的运动轨迹仍然很困难。本研究的目的是利用4D CT和4D CBCT的幻像实验来研究随呼吸运动的目标的位置阶段。方法:为了模拟呼吸运动,我们利用四维CT和四维CBCT捕捉运动幻影与模拟呼吸同步的模拟肿瘤图像。模拟肿瘤的呼吸周期分别为3、4、5和7.5 s,每次呼吸位移分别为20、16、10、8和4 mm。在此条件下,采集4D CT和4D CBCT图像。利用治疗计划系统,从获得的每个呼吸期图像中设置模拟肿瘤的感兴趣区域,识别肿瘤并将该区域设置为目标。利用治疗计划系统测量4D CT和4D CBCT相应相位图像中目标质心的体积、位置误差和Dice系数。结果:4D CT与4D CBCT的靶心位置误差一般在±1mm以内。4D CT和4D CBCT各工况下各呼吸期的Dice系数普遍在0.8以上。结论:4D CBCT对呼吸运动目标的检测能力与4D CT相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信