Survey of workplace violence prevention programs in nursing homes.

James D Blando, Marilyn Lou Ridenour, Daniel Hartley
{"title":"Survey of workplace violence prevention programs in nursing homes.","authors":"James D Blando, Marilyn Lou Ridenour, Daniel Hartley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing care facilities are more than seven times as likely to have a worker injured by workplace violence requiring days away from work compared to the overall rate in the private sector (BLS, 2018b). Several states have implemented regulations requiring workplace violence prevention programs in healthcare facilities, including nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The manager responsible for workplace violence prevention programs at twenty long-term care (LTC) facilities in New Jersey (n=9) and Virginia (n=11) voluntarily participated in a face-to-face interview utilizing a validated survey regarding workplace violence programs in their facilities. This project compared the comprehensiveness of nursing home workplace violence prevention programs in New Jersey (NJ) where the \"Workplace Violence Prevention in Healthcare Facilities Act\" was enacted with the comprehensiveness of programs in Virginia (VA) where no workplace violence regulations exist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics show that there was variation in workplace violence prevention program components, such as training, reporting, and risk assessments, where some facilities had relatively comprehensive programs and others had weak programs. Virginia, the control state without any workplace violence regulations generally had equal implementation compared to the New Jersey, the regulated state. Overall nursing home characteristics and its relationship to security program implementation was mixed. LTC facilities with above average Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ratings and non-profit status reported higher utilization of environmental controls. The data shows that facilities in Virginia (non-regulated state), non-profit facilities, corporate owned, and facilities with high CMS ratings tended to have a high level of training. It was also found that corporate owned facilities had more extensive implementation of security programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey demonstrated that nursing home administrators are aware of workplace violence in their facilities and have instituted programs and policies to attempt to address this issue. However, these programs and policies are diffuse and \"ad-hoc\" in nature, likely making them less effective. A lack of regulatory enforcement and the lack of awareness of regulations contributes to the ineffectiveness of the regulation and implementation of security program elements. Other parameters such as overall nursing home quality (e.g. CMS rating) and corporate versus independent ownership also seemed to impact the comprehensiveness of security programs, but this relationship is multifactorial and less clearly articulated by this study design.</p>","PeriodicalId":73772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare protection management : publication of the International Association for Hospital Security","volume":"37 1","pages":"100-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare protection management : publication of the International Association for Hospital Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing care facilities are more than seven times as likely to have a worker injured by workplace violence requiring days away from work compared to the overall rate in the private sector (BLS, 2018b). Several states have implemented regulations requiring workplace violence prevention programs in healthcare facilities, including nursing homes.

Methods: The manager responsible for workplace violence prevention programs at twenty long-term care (LTC) facilities in New Jersey (n=9) and Virginia (n=11) voluntarily participated in a face-to-face interview utilizing a validated survey regarding workplace violence programs in their facilities. This project compared the comprehensiveness of nursing home workplace violence prevention programs in New Jersey (NJ) where the "Workplace Violence Prevention in Healthcare Facilities Act" was enacted with the comprehensiveness of programs in Virginia (VA) where no workplace violence regulations exist.

Results: Descriptive statistics show that there was variation in workplace violence prevention program components, such as training, reporting, and risk assessments, where some facilities had relatively comprehensive programs and others had weak programs. Virginia, the control state without any workplace violence regulations generally had equal implementation compared to the New Jersey, the regulated state. Overall nursing home characteristics and its relationship to security program implementation was mixed. LTC facilities with above average Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ratings and non-profit status reported higher utilization of environmental controls. The data shows that facilities in Virginia (non-regulated state), non-profit facilities, corporate owned, and facilities with high CMS ratings tended to have a high level of training. It was also found that corporate owned facilities had more extensive implementation of security programs.

Conclusion: This survey demonstrated that nursing home administrators are aware of workplace violence in their facilities and have instituted programs and policies to attempt to address this issue. However, these programs and policies are diffuse and "ad-hoc" in nature, likely making them less effective. A lack of regulatory enforcement and the lack of awareness of regulations contributes to the ineffectiveness of the regulation and implementation of security program elements. Other parameters such as overall nursing home quality (e.g. CMS rating) and corporate versus independent ownership also seemed to impact the comprehensiveness of security programs, but this relationship is multifactorial and less clearly articulated by this study design.

疗养院工作场所暴力预防计划的调查。
背景:与私营部门的总体比率相比,护理机构因工作场所暴力受伤的工人需要请假的可能性是私营部门的七倍多(劳工统计局,2018b)。一些州已经实施法规,要求在包括养老院在内的医疗机构开展工作场所暴力预防项目。方法:在新泽西州(n=9)和弗吉尼亚州(n=11)的20个长期护理(LTC)设施负责工作场所暴力预防项目的经理自愿参加了面对面的访谈,利用了关于其设施中工作场所暴力项目的有效调查。该项目比较了新泽西州养老院工作场所暴力预防项目的全面性,该州颁布了《医疗设施工作场所暴力预防法案》,而弗吉尼亚州没有工作场所暴力法规。结果:描述性统计数据显示,工作场所暴力预防计划的组成部分存在差异,例如培训、报告和风险评估,其中一些设施的计划相对全面,而另一些设施的计划薄弱。没有任何工作场所暴力法规的控制州弗吉尼亚州与受监管的州新泽西州相比,总体上执行情况相同。总体而言,养老院的特点及其与安全计划实施的关系是混合的。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)评级高于平均水平和非营利状态的LTC设施报告了更高的环境控制利用率。数据显示,弗吉尼亚州(非监管州)的设施,非营利设施,公司拥有的设施以及CMS评级高的设施往往具有高水平的培训。调查还发现,企业拥有的设施更广泛地实施了安全计划。结论:这项调查表明,养老院的管理者意识到他们的设施中的工作场所暴力,并制定了计划和政策来试图解决这个问题。然而,这些计划和政策在本质上是分散的和“临时的”,可能会使它们不那么有效。缺乏法规强制执行和缺乏法规意识导致了安全程序要素的法规和实施的无效。其他参数,如养老院的整体质量(如CMS评级)和企业与独立所有权似乎也会影响安全计划的全面性,但这种关系是多因素的,本研究设计不太清楚地阐述了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信