Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal lesion detection: a case-control study on diagnostic accuracy and histopathological agreement.
Marcio Roberto Facanali Junior, Afonso Henrique da Silva Sousa Junior, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Marques, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal lesion detection: a case-control study on diagnostic accuracy and histopathological agreement.","authors":"Marcio Roberto Facanali Junior, Afonso Henrique da Silva Sousa Junior, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Marques, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro","doi":"10.1590/0102-67202025000029e1898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy has emerged as a tool to enhance adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and improve lesion characterization. However, its performance in real-world settings, especially in developing countries, remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of AI on ADRs and its concordance with histopathological diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A matched case-control study was conducted at a colorectal cancer (CRC) referral center, including 146 patients aged 45-75 years who underwent colonoscopy for CRC screening or surveillance. Patients were allocated into two groups: AI-assisted colonoscopy (n=74) and high-definition conventional colonoscopy (n=72). The primary outcome was ADR, and the secondary outcome was the agreement between AI-based lesion characterization and histopathology. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ADR was higher in the AI group (60%) than in the control group (50%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). AI-assisted lesion characterization showed substantial agreement with histopathology (kappa=0.692). No significant difference was found in withdrawal time (29 min vs. 27 min; p>0.05), indicating that AI did not delay the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although AI did not significantly increase ADR compared to conventional colonoscopy, it demonstrated strong histopathological concordance, supporting its reliability in lesion characterization. AI may reduce interobserver variability and optimize real-time decision-making, reinforcing its clinical utility in CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":72298,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","volume":"38 ","pages":"e1898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-67202025000029e1898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy has emerged as a tool to enhance adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and improve lesion characterization. However, its performance in real-world settings, especially in developing countries, remains uncertain.
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of AI on ADRs and its concordance with histopathological diagnosis.
Methods: A matched case-control study was conducted at a colorectal cancer (CRC) referral center, including 146 patients aged 45-75 years who underwent colonoscopy for CRC screening or surveillance. Patients were allocated into two groups: AI-assisted colonoscopy (n=74) and high-definition conventional colonoscopy (n=72). The primary outcome was ADR, and the secondary outcome was the agreement between AI-based lesion characterization and histopathology. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: ADR was higher in the AI group (60%) than in the control group (50%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). AI-assisted lesion characterization showed substantial agreement with histopathology (kappa=0.692). No significant difference was found in withdrawal time (29 min vs. 27 min; p>0.05), indicating that AI did not delay the procedure.
Conclusions: Although AI did not significantly increase ADR compared to conventional colonoscopy, it demonstrated strong histopathological concordance, supporting its reliability in lesion characterization. AI may reduce interobserver variability and optimize real-time decision-making, reinforcing its clinical utility in CRC screening.
背景:人工智能(AI)辅助结肠镜检查已成为提高腺瘤检出率(adr)和改善病变特征的工具。然而,它在现实环境中的表现,特别是在发展中国家,仍然不确定。目的:本研究的目的是评估人工智能对不良反应的影响及其与组织病理学诊断的一致性。方法:在结直肠癌(CRC)转诊中心进行匹配病例对照研究,包括146例年龄在45-75岁之间接受结肠镜检查进行CRC筛查或监测的患者。患者被分为两组:人工智能辅助结肠镜检查(n=74)和高清晰度常规结肠镜检查(n=72)。主要结果是不良反应,次要结果是基于人工智能的病变特征与组织病理学之间的一致性。结果:AI组不良反应(60%)高于对照组(50%),但差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。ai辅助的病变特征与组织病理学基本一致(kappa=0.692)。停药时间差异无统计学意义(29 min vs. 27 min; p < 0.05),说明人工智能没有延迟手术时间。结论:虽然与常规结肠镜检查相比,人工智能没有显著增加不良反应,但其表现出很强的组织病理学一致性,支持其在病变表征方面的可靠性。人工智能可以减少观察者之间的差异,优化实时决策,增强其在结直肠癌筛查中的临床应用。