Evaluating the impact of relative dose intensity on efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan for metastatic breast cancer in the real-world clinical setting.

IF 2 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Han Yi Lee, Vivianne Shih, Jack Junjie Chan, Shun Zi Liong, Ryan Shea Ying Cong Tan, Jun Ma, Bernard Ji Guang Chua, Joshua Zhi Chien Tan, Chuan Yaw Lee, Wei Ling Teo, Su-Ming Tan, Phyu Nitar, Yoon Sim Yap, Mabel Wong, Rebecca Dent, Fuh Yong Wong, Tira J Tan
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of relative dose intensity on efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan for metastatic breast cancer in the real-world clinical setting.","authors":"Han Yi Lee, Vivianne Shih, Jack Junjie Chan, Shun Zi Liong, Ryan Shea Ying Cong Tan, Jun Ma, Bernard Ji Guang Chua, Joshua Zhi Chien Tan, Chuan Yaw Lee, Wei Ling Teo, Su-Ming Tan, Phyu Nitar, Yoon Sim Yap, Mabel Wong, Rebecca Dent, Fuh Yong Wong, Tira J Tan","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has revolutionised treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). While effective, its high cost and toxicities, such as fatigue and nausea, pose challenges.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Medical records from the Joint Breast Cancer Registry in Singapore were used to study MBC patients treated with T-DXd (February 2021-June 2024). This study was conducted to address whether reducing dose intensity and density may have an adverse effect on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven MBC patients were treated with T-DXd, with a median age of 59 years. At the time of data cutoff, 32.1% of patients were still receiving T-DXd. Over half (54%) of the patients received treatment with an initial relative dose intensity (RDI) of <;85%. Overall median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 8.1 months. rwPFS was similar between RDI groups (<85%: 8.7 months, <85%: 8.1 months, P=0.62). However, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients showed significantly better rwPFS outcomes compared to HER2-low patients (8.8 versus 2.5 months, P<0.001). Only 16% with central nervous system (CNS) involvement had CNS progressive disease on treatment. No significant progression-free survival (PFS) differences were found between patients with or without CNS disease, regardless of RDI groups. Five patients (5.7%) developed interstitial lung disease (ILD), with 3 (3.4%) having grade 3 events. Two required high-dose steroids and none were rechallenged after ILD. There were no fatalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that reduced dose intensity and density had no significant impact on rwPFS or treatment-related toxicities. Furthermore, only 5.7% of patients developed ILD. T-Dxd provided good control of CNS disease, with 82% of patients achieving CNS disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":502093,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":"54 8","pages":"458-466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has revolutionised treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). While effective, its high cost and toxicities, such as fatigue and nausea, pose challenges.

Method: Medical records from the Joint Breast Cancer Registry in Singapore were used to study MBC patients treated with T-DXd (February 2021-June 2024). This study was conducted to address whether reducing dose intensity and density may have an adverse effect on treatment outcomes.

Results: Eighty-seven MBC patients were treated with T-DXd, with a median age of 59 years. At the time of data cutoff, 32.1% of patients were still receiving T-DXd. Over half (54%) of the patients received treatment with an initial relative dose intensity (RDI) of <;85%. Overall median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 8.1 months. rwPFS was similar between RDI groups (<85%: 8.7 months, <85%: 8.1 months, P=0.62). However, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients showed significantly better rwPFS outcomes compared to HER2-low patients (8.8 versus 2.5 months, P<0.001). Only 16% with central nervous system (CNS) involvement had CNS progressive disease on treatment. No significant progression-free survival (PFS) differences were found between patients with or without CNS disease, regardless of RDI groups. Five patients (5.7%) developed interstitial lung disease (ILD), with 3 (3.4%) having grade 3 events. Two required high-dose steroids and none were rechallenged after ILD. There were no fatalities.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that reduced dose intensity and density had no significant impact on rwPFS or treatment-related toxicities. Furthermore, only 5.7% of patients developed ILD. T-Dxd provided good control of CNS disease, with 82% of patients achieving CNS disease control.

在真实世界的临床环境中评估相对剂量强度对曲妥珠单抗德鲁德替康治疗转移性乳腺癌疗效的影响。
曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-DXd)彻底改变了转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的治疗方法。虽然有效,但它的高成本和毒性,如疲劳和恶心,带来了挑战。方法:利用新加坡联合乳腺癌登记处的医疗记录,研究2021年2月至2024年6月期间接受T-DXd治疗的MBC患者。本研究旨在探讨降低剂量强度和密度是否会对治疗结果产生不良影响。结果:87例MBC患者接受T-DXd治疗,中位年龄59岁。截至数据截止时,32.1%的患者仍在接受T-DXd治疗。超过一半(54%)的患者接受了初始相对剂量强度(RDI)的治疗。结论:我们的研究表明,降低剂量强度和密度对rwPFS或治疗相关毒性没有显著影响。此外,只有5.7%的患者发展为ILD。T-Dxd能很好地控制中枢神经系统疾病,82%的患者实现了中枢神经系统疾病的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信