Automatic brain segmentation in cognitive impairment: Validation of AI-based AQUA software in the Southeast Asian BIOCIS cohort.

IF 2 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ashwati Vipin, Rasyiqah Binte Shaik Mohamed Salim, Regina Ey Kim, Minho Lee, Hye Weon Kim, ZunHyan Rieu, Nagaendran Kandiah
{"title":"Automatic brain segmentation in cognitive impairment: Validation of AI-based AQUA software in the Southeast Asian BIOCIS cohort.","authors":"Ashwati Vipin, Rasyiqah Binte Shaik Mohamed Salim, Regina Ey Kim, Minho Lee, Hye Weon Kim, ZunHyan Rieu, Nagaendran Kandiah","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interpretation and analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in clinical settings comprise time-consuming visual ratings and complex neuroimage processing that require trained professionals. To combat these challenges, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can aid clinicians in interpreting brain MRI for accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases but they require extensive validation. Thus, the aim of this study was to validate the use of AI-based AQUA (Neurophet Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) segmentation software in a Southeast Asian community-based cohort with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Study participants belonged to the community-based Biomarker and Cognition Study in Singapore. Participants aged between 30 and 95 years, having cognitive concerns, with no diagnosis of major psychiatric, neurological or systemic disorders who were recruited consecutively between April 2022 and July 2023 were included. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessments and structural MRI, and were classified as cognitively normal, with MCI or with dementia. MRI pre-processing using automated pipelines, along with human-based visual ratings, were compared against AI-based automated AQUA output. Default mode network grey matter (GM) volumes were compared between cognitively normal, MCI and dementia groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 participants (mean age at visit was 63.32±10.96 years) were included in the study (30 cognitively normal, 40 MCI and 20 dementia). Non-parametric Spearman correlation analysis indicated that AQUA-based and human-based visual ratings were correlated with total (ρ=0.66; P<0.0001), periventricular (ρ=0.50; P<0.0001) and deep (ρ=0.57; P<0.0001) white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Additionally, volumetric WMH obtained from AQUA and automated pipelines was also strongly correlated (ρ=0.84; P<0.0001) and these correlations remained after controlling for age at visit, sex and diagnosis. Linear regression analyses illustrated significantly different AQUA-derived default mode network GM volumes between cognitively normal, MCI and dementia groups. Dementia participants had significant atrophy in the posterior cingulate cortex compared to cognitively normal participants (P=0.021; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.25 to -0.08) and in the hippocampus compared to cognitively normal (P=0.0049; 95% CI -1.05 to -0.16) and MCI participants (P=0.0036; 95% CI -1.02 to -0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate high concordance between human-based visual ratings and AQUA-based ratings of WMH. Additionally, the AQUA GM segmentation pipeline showed good differentiation in key regions between cognitively normal, MCI and dementia participants. Based on these findings, the automated AQUA software could aid clinicians in examining MRI scans of patients with cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":502093,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":"54 8","pages":"467-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interpretation and analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in clinical settings comprise time-consuming visual ratings and complex neuroimage processing that require trained professionals. To combat these challenges, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can aid clinicians in interpreting brain MRI for accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases but they require extensive validation. Thus, the aim of this study was to validate the use of AI-based AQUA (Neurophet Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) segmentation software in a Southeast Asian community-based cohort with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.

Method: Study participants belonged to the community-based Biomarker and Cognition Study in Singapore. Participants aged between 30 and 95 years, having cognitive concerns, with no diagnosis of major psychiatric, neurological or systemic disorders who were recruited consecutively between April 2022 and July 2023 were included. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessments and structural MRI, and were classified as cognitively normal, with MCI or with dementia. MRI pre-processing using automated pipelines, along with human-based visual ratings, were compared against AI-based automated AQUA output. Default mode network grey matter (GM) volumes were compared between cognitively normal, MCI and dementia groups.

Results: A total of 90 participants (mean age at visit was 63.32±10.96 years) were included in the study (30 cognitively normal, 40 MCI and 20 dementia). Non-parametric Spearman correlation analysis indicated that AQUA-based and human-based visual ratings were correlated with total (ρ=0.66; P<0.0001), periventricular (ρ=0.50; P<0.0001) and deep (ρ=0.57; P<0.0001) white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Additionally, volumetric WMH obtained from AQUA and automated pipelines was also strongly correlated (ρ=0.84; P<0.0001) and these correlations remained after controlling for age at visit, sex and diagnosis. Linear regression analyses illustrated significantly different AQUA-derived default mode network GM volumes between cognitively normal, MCI and dementia groups. Dementia participants had significant atrophy in the posterior cingulate cortex compared to cognitively normal participants (P=0.021; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.25 to -0.08) and in the hippocampus compared to cognitively normal (P=0.0049; 95% CI -1.05 to -0.16) and MCI participants (P=0.0036; 95% CI -1.02 to -0.17).

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate high concordance between human-based visual ratings and AQUA-based ratings of WMH. Additionally, the AQUA GM segmentation pipeline showed good differentiation in key regions between cognitively normal, MCI and dementia participants. Based on these findings, the automated AQUA software could aid clinicians in examining MRI scans of patients with cognitive impairment.

认知障碍的自动脑分割:基于人工智能的AQUA软件在东南亚BIOCIS队列中的验证。
在临床环境中,磁共振成像(MRI)扫描的解释和分析包括耗时的视觉评级和复杂的神经图像处理,需要训练有素的专业人员。为了应对这些挑战,人工智能(AI)技术可以帮助临床医生解释大脑MRI以准确诊断神经退行性疾病,但它们需要广泛的验证。因此,本研究的目的是验证基于人工智能的AQUA (Neurophet Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea)分割软件在东南亚以社区为基础的具有正常认知、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的队列中的应用。方法:研究对象属于新加坡社区生物标志物和认知研究。在2022年4月至2023年7月期间连续招募的参与者年龄在30至95岁之间,有认知问题,没有诊断出严重的精神、神经或全身疾病。参与者接受了神经心理学评估和结构MRI,并被分类为认知正常、轻度认知障碍或痴呆。使用自动化管道的MRI预处理,以及基于人类的视觉评分,与基于人工智能的自动化AQUA输出进行了比较。比较认知正常组、轻度认知障碍组和痴呆组的默认模式网络灰质(GM)体积。结果:共纳入90例受试者(平均就诊年龄63.32±10.96岁),其中认知正常30例,轻度认知障碍40例,痴呆20例。非参数Spearman相关分析显示,基于aqua的视觉评分和基于人的视觉评分与总分相关(ρ=0.66)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,基于人的视觉评分和基于aqua的WMH评分之间具有高度的一致性。此外,AQUA GM分割管道在认知正常、MCI和痴呆参与者之间的关键区域表现出良好的分化。基于这些发现,自动化的AQUA软件可以帮助临床医生检查认知障碍患者的MRI扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信