Dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) for reducing bulbar symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - assessment of treatment experience in a multicenter study.

IF 2.8
Susanne Spittel, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Dagmar Kettemann, Rachel Fabian, Annekathrin Rödiger, Uta Smesny, Robert Steinbach, Benjamin Ilse, Ute Weyen, Susanne Petri, Rea Lumi, Bogdan Bjelica, Paul Lingor, Julian Grosskreutz, Bettina M Göricke, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Wibke Schmeja, Johannes Dorst, Alexander Mensch, Jürgen Siebert, Jenny Norden, Sarah Bernsen, Senthil Kumar Subramanian, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier, Thomas Meyer
{"title":"Dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) for reducing bulbar symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - assessment of treatment experience in a multicenter study.","authors":"Susanne Spittel, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Dagmar Kettemann, Rachel Fabian, Annekathrin Rödiger, Uta Smesny, Robert Steinbach, Benjamin Ilse, Ute Weyen, Susanne Petri, Rea Lumi, Bogdan Bjelica, Paul Lingor, Julian Grosskreutz, Bettina M Göricke, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Wibke Schmeja, Johannes Dorst, Alexander Mensch, Jürgen Siebert, Jenny Norden, Sarah Bernsen, Senthil Kumar Subramanian, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier, Thomas Meyer","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2557932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) has been reported to reduce bulbar symptoms, including dysarthria and dysphagia. However, data on patients' perceptions of DMQ treatment are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on DMQ treatment were collected from 1065 ALS patients treated at 13 ALS centers between 10-2015 and 06-2025. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) of 179 participants were remotely assessed via the \"ALS App\". PROM included the self-explanatory version of the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R-SE), the Net Promoter Score (NPS); and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean disease duration was 29.3 months (SD 38.1). ALS progression before treatment was 0.82 points/month (ALSFRS-R). Mean DMQ treatment duration was 8.4 months (SD 10.8), including 35.2% (<i>n</i> = 374) of shorter (<3 months), 35.3% (<i>n</i> = 375) of longer (3-9 months), and 29.5% (<i>n</i> = 313) of very long DMQ treatment (>9 months). Patients' recommendation (<i>n</i> = 178) was positive (NPS: +23) with higher scores after very long DMQ treatment (NPS +37) compared to longer (NPS +15) and shorter treatment (NPS +7.5), respectively. TSQM-9 scores (<i>n</i> = 163) demonstrated high satisfaction for effectiveness 60.0 (SD 25.9), convenience 73.8 (SD 18.2), and global satisfaction 63.4 (SD 29.8).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The positive perception in PROM underscores the value of DMQ as an individualized treatment option for bulbar symptoms in ALS. However, shortage of clinical data, online assessment, and selection biases are among the limitations of this study that need to be addressed in further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2557932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) has been reported to reduce bulbar symptoms, including dysarthria and dysphagia. However, data on patients' perceptions of DMQ treatment are limited.

Methods: Data on DMQ treatment were collected from 1065 ALS patients treated at 13 ALS centers between 10-2015 and 06-2025. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) of 179 participants were remotely assessed via the "ALS App". PROM included the self-explanatory version of the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R-SE), the Net Promoter Score (NPS); and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).

Results: Mean disease duration was 29.3 months (SD 38.1). ALS progression before treatment was 0.82 points/month (ALSFRS-R). Mean DMQ treatment duration was 8.4 months (SD 10.8), including 35.2% (n = 374) of shorter (<3 months), 35.3% (n = 375) of longer (3-9 months), and 29.5% (n = 313) of very long DMQ treatment (>9 months). Patients' recommendation (n = 178) was positive (NPS: +23) with higher scores after very long DMQ treatment (NPS +37) compared to longer (NPS +15) and shorter treatment (NPS +7.5), respectively. TSQM-9 scores (n = 163) demonstrated high satisfaction for effectiveness 60.0 (SD 25.9), convenience 73.8 (SD 18.2), and global satisfaction 63.4 (SD 29.8).

Interpretation: The positive perception in PROM underscores the value of DMQ as an individualized treatment option for bulbar symptoms in ALS. However, shortage of clinical data, online assessment, and selection biases are among the limitations of this study that need to be addressed in further investigations.

右美沙芬/奎尼丁(DMQ)减轻肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的球囊症状——多中心研究中治疗经验的评估
背景:在肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)中,右美沙芬/奎尼丁(DMQ)已被报道可减轻球症状,包括构音障碍和吞咽困难。然而,关于患者对DMQ治疗的看法的数据是有限的。方法:收集2015年10月至2025年6月期间在13个ALS中心治疗的1065例ALS患者的DMQ治疗数据。179名参与者的患者报告结果测量(PROM)通过“ALS应用程序”进行远程评估。PROM包括自解释版ALS功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R-SE),净启动子评分(NPS);用药治疗满意度问卷(TSQM-9)。结果:平均病程29.3个月(SD 38.1)。治疗前ALS进展为0.82分/月(ALSFRS-R)。DMQ治疗平均持续时间为8.4个月(SD 10.8),其中较短(n = 375)较长(3-9个月)的患者占35.2% (n = 374),极长DMQ治疗(10 -9个月)的患者占29.5% (n = 313)。患者推荐值(n = 178)为阳性(NPS: +23),较长时间DMQ治疗(NPS +37)评分高于较长时间(NPS +15)和较短时间(NPS +7.5)。TSQM-9评分(n = 163)对有效性满意度为60.0 (SD 25.9),便利性满意度为73.8 (SD 18.2),整体满意度为63.4 (SD 29.8)。结论:对早舞会的积极看法强调了DMQ作为ALS患者球茎症状个体化治疗选择的价值。然而,缺乏临床数据、在线评估和选择偏差是本研究的局限性,需要在进一步的研究中加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信